# Clinical Outcomes of Partial Two-Stage Revision with Femoral Stem Retention in Elderly Patients with Hip Periprosthetic Joint Infection

**Authors:** Ji Hoon Bahk, Jun-Dong Chang, Young Wook Lim, Sinje Kim, Kee-Haeng Lee

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/jcm15062102 · Journal of Clinical Medicine · 2026-03-10

## TL;DR

This study shows that retaining the femoral stem during partial two-stage revision surgery can effectively treat hip infections in elderly patients while minimizing surgical risks.

## Contribution

The study introduces partial two-stage revision with femoral stem retention as a viable, less invasive option for elderly patients with hip PJI.

## Key findings

- Infection control was achieved in all patients at final follow-up.
- No recurrence of infection was observed in either group.
- Functional outcomes were acceptable with no stem-related complications.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip remains a challenging complication, particularly in elderly patients who may not tolerate repeated invasive procedures. While two-stage, one-stage, and 1.5-stage revisions are established strategies, an optimal approach for elderly patients with a well-fixed femoral stem remains unclear. This study evaluated the clinical outcomes of partial two-stage revision with femoral stem retention in elderly patients with hip PJI. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of patients aged 65 years or older who underwent two-stage revision for hip PJI without femoral stem extraction at a single institution and had a minimum follow-up of one year after the final treatment. Patients were treated with aggressive debridement, removal of all components except the femoral stem, and placement of an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer and beads. Clinical outcomes, infection eradication, complications, and functional status were assessed. Results: Twenty-eight patients (28 hips) were included, with a mean age of 79.5 years and a mean follow-up of 46.2 months. The index arthroplasty was hemiarthroplasty in most cases (92.9%). Seventeen patients completed a second-stage revision, while 11 remained with cement spacer retention. Infection control was achieved in all patients (100%) at final follow-up, with initial infection control achieved in 96.4%. No recurrence of infection was observed in either group. Multidrug-resistant organisms were identified in 67.9% of cases. Functional outcomes were acceptable, and no stem-related complications or reinfections occurred. Conclusions: Partial two-stage revision with femoral stem retention provided effective infection control and acceptable functional outcomes in elderly patients with hip PJI. This approach may be considered a reasonable treatment option for elderly patients with a well-fixed femoral stem when reducing surgical invasiveness is an important consideration.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** periprosthetic joint infection (MONDO:0800179)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Infection (MESH:D007239), PJI (MESH:D057068), Hip (MESH:D025981)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13026458/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13026458/full.md

## References

39 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13026458/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13026458