# Patient–Physician Discordance and Unmet Needs in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Network Analysis of Clinical and Quality-of-Life Domains

## TL;DR

This study explores why some rheumatoid arthritis patients still feel unmet needs despite modern treatments, finding that pain and psychosocial factors play key roles.

## Contribution

The paper introduces a network analysis approach to identify multidimensional factors influencing unmet needs in rheumatoid arthritis.

## Key findings

- Pain intensity is the most central factor in the clinical network linked to unmet needs.
- Disease activity scores do not directly correlate with unmet needs after accounting for shared variance.
- Perceived health change and emotional role limitations are key in the quality-of-life network.

## Abstract

Background: Despite the widespread implementation of treat-to-target strategies and modern disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, a substantial proportion of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) continue to report unmet needs (UNs), defined as a mismatch between patient expectations and symptom burden on the one hand and outcomes achieved with current care on the other. Patient–physician discordance in global assessments may reflect multidimensional influences, including pain mechanisms, psychosocial factors, functional impairment, and communication gaps, extending beyond inflammatory disease activity. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 133 patients with RA and 57 healthy controls were included. UNs were operationalized as the signed difference between patient global assessment and physician global assessment (ΔPGA–PhGA). Clinical variables, patient-reported outcomes, and Short Form-36 (SF-36) domains were incorporated into two regularized partial correlation network models estimated using the extended Bayesian information criterion graphical least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (EBICglasso). Node centrality indices (strength, signed strength, betweenness, and closeness) were calculated. Network stability was evaluated using 2000 bootstrap resamples and correlation stability (CS) coefficients. Results: In the clinical network, pain intensity demonstrated the highest strength centrality and the strongest direct association with UNs. In contrast, Disease Activity Score in 28 joints with C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) showed no direct association with UNs after accounting for shared variance. In the SF-36-based quality-of-life network, UNs exhibited inverse associations, particularly with perceived health change and role–emotional functioning. Stability analyses indicated acceptable to good robustness (clinical network: CS = 0.59 for edge weights and 0.44 for strength; SF-36 network: CS = 0.59), supporting the reliability of the estimated network structures. Conclusions: UNs in RA are not solely determined by inflammatory disease activity but are embedded within interconnected clinical and psychosocial domains. Pain occupies a structurally central position in the clinical network, whereas perceived health change and emotional role limitations characterize the quality-of-life context of UNs. These findings underscore the importance of multidimensional and patient-centered assessment strategies in RA management.