# Analysis of the rs3807135, rs3757385 and rs3778754 Variants of the IRF5 Gene and mRNA Expression in Patients with Melanoma Cancer from Western Mexico

**Authors:** Claudia A. Tapia-Leyva, Fernando Valdez-Salazar, Luis A. Jiménez-Del Río, Jorge R. Padilla-Gutiérrez, José F. Muñoz-Valle, Emmanuel Valdés-Alvarado

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/genes17030254 · Genes · 2026-02-24

## TL;DR

This study examined if specific IRF5 gene variants are linked to melanoma risk in western Mexico but found no significant associations.

## Contribution

The study provides population-specific insights into IRF5 gene variants and melanoma in western Mexico.

## Key findings

- No significant associations were found between IRF5 SNVs and melanoma risk.
- IRF5 mRNA expression was lower in melanoma patients, but the difference was not statistically significant.
- The CGG haplotype showed a non-significant protective tendency against melanoma.

## Abstract

Objective: To analyze the association between the IRF5 gene variants rs3807135, rs3757385, and rs3778754 and mRNA expression levels in patients from western Mexico diagnosed with melanoma. Methods: An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted including 374 individuals (153 patients with newly diagnosed melanoma and no previous treatment, and 221 controls). The melanoma group was matched to the reference group. Genotyping of the rs3807135 (T>C), rs3757385 (T>G), and rs3778754 (C>G) variants was performed using the allelic discrimination method with TaqMan® probes. Relative mRNA expression was quantified by qPCR using the 2–ΔΔCT method, comparing IRF5 expression levels with those of the housekeeping gene GAPDH. Statistical analyses were performed in R, and allelic and genotypic frequencies were compared between patients and controls using the Chi-square test. Results: No statistically significant associations were identified between IRF5 SNVs rs3807135, rs3757385, and rs3778754 and melanoma risk. The haplotypic pattern comprised TTC, CGG, and CGC, with CGG showing a non-significant protective tendency. The mean relative expression of IRF5 was lower in melanoma patients compared with controls (≈0.39 vs. 1.0; Δ = 0.61), although this difference did not reach statistical significance (U = 1725; p = 0.841). These findings suggest a modest modulatory effect of IRF5 at the haplotypic level, likely driven by combined variant effects. Conclusions: In conclusion, the present study did not identify statistically significant associations between the IRF5 single-nucleotide variants rs3807135, rs3757385, and rs3778754 and melanoma risk in the analyzed population from western Mexico. Likewise, no significant differences in allele or genotype distributions were observed between melanoma patients and control individuals. These findings suggest that the evaluated IRF5 genetic variants do not constitute major susceptibility factors for melanoma in this cohort.

## Linked entities

- **Genes:** IRF5 (interferon regulatory factor 5) [NCBI Gene 3663], GAPDH (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) [NCBI Gene 2597]
- **Diseases:** melanoma (MONDO:0005105)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** IRF5 (interferon regulatory factor 5) [NCBI Gene 3663] {aka SLEB10}, GAPDH (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) [NCBI Gene 2597] {aka G3PD, GAPD, HEL-S-162eP}
- **Diseases:** Melanoma Cancer (MESH:D009369), melanoma (MESH:D008545)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]
- **Mutations:** C>G, rs3807135, T>G

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13026175/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13026175/full.md

## References

39 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13026175/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13026175