# Acromegalic Uteropathy: Specific Uterine Ultrasound Findings in Female Patients

## TL;DR

Women with acromegaly show unique cervical enlargement without changes in the uterine body, suggesting a specific uterine condition linked to the disease.

## Contribution

Identifies a distinct uterine phenotype in acromegaly characterized by selective cervical hypertrophy.

## Key findings

- Cervical size and volume were significantly larger in acromegaly patients compared to healthy controls.
- The uterine-to-cervix volume ratio was reduced in acromegaly, indicating disproportionate cervical growth.
- The pattern of cervical enlargement was distinct from that seen in adenomyosis.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: Acromegaly is a systemic connective tissue disease driven by chronic growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) excess; yet, the female reproductive tract—especially the extracellular matrix (ECM)-rich cervix—has been poorly studied. We aimed to compare uterine and cervical morphology in women with acromegaly versus healthy controls and a gynecologic disease comparator, testing the hypothesis of selective cervical hypertrophy. Methods: We performed a retrospective case–control study of reproductive-age women who underwent pelvic ultrasound: acromegaly (n = 33), healthy controls (n = 45), and adenomyosis without acromegaly (n = 44). Uterine body measurements were obtained by TAUS/TVUS; cervical biometry was performed transvaginally in all cases. Volumes were estimated using the ellipsoid formula, and a uterus-to-cervix (U:C) volume ratio was calculated. Group differences were analyzed with Mann–Whitney tests and Bonferroni correction. Results: A total of 122 women were included. Uterine body length, width, AP size, and volume did not differ between acromegaly and either comparison group (all p-values non-significant). In contrast, cervical length, width, AP thickness, and volume were significantly higher in acromegaly than in healthy controls, with a corresponding reduction in the U:C volume ratio, indicating disproportionate cervical enlargement. Compared with adenomyosis, women with acromegaly again showed larger cervical width, AP thickness, and volume, together with altered U:C indices, whereas cervical length did not differ, suggesting a pattern not explained by nonspecific pelvic pathology. Conclusions: Women with acromegaly demonstrate a distinct uterine phenotype characterized by selective cervical hypertrophy with preserved uterine corpus size—an ECM-centric “acromegalic uteropathy.” This noninvasive morphometric signature may have diagnostic and procedural relevance and warrants confirmation in prospective studies.