# Impact of Smear Layer Removal Using Etidronate- and EDTA-Based Irrigation Protocols on Root Canal Microbiota: An In Vivo Study

**Authors:** Svetlana Razumova, Anzhela Brago, Anzhelika Kryuchkova, Zilolakhon Khakimova, Nazira Khabibova, Alexander Volkov, Haydar Barakat, Natalya Dikopova

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/dj14030151 · Dentistry Journal · 2026-03-07

## TL;DR

This study compares different irrigation methods for removing bacteria from root canals in patients with chronic apical periodontitis.

## Contribution

It evaluates the antimicrobial effectiveness of etidronate-based protocols as an alternative to EDTA in root canal irrigation.

## Key findings

- All protocols reduced microbial load, but etidronate in sodium hypochlorite showed the best antimicrobial performance.
- Sequential etidronate irrigation had the lowest antimicrobial effectiveness.
- Continuous chelation with etidronate may be a clinically feasible alternative.

## Abstract

Background: The effective elimination of root canal microbiota is essential for the treatment of apical periodontitis. The smear layer formed during instrumentation limits the penetration of irrigants into dentinal tubules, making chelation a critical component of irrigation protocols. While ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) is commonly used for smear layer removal, etidronate has been proposed as an alternative due to its chemical compatibility with sodium hypochlorite. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of different irrigation protocols in eliminating microorganisms from the root canal system in patients with chronic apical periodontitis. Methods: Thirty patients aged 18–44 years diagnosed with chronic apical periodontitis (ICD-10 code K04.5) were included. Three irrigation protocols were evaluated: (1) 3% sodium hypochlorite followed by 17% EDTA; (2) 3% sodium hypochlorite followed by a 9% aqueous solution of etidronate; and (3) a 9% solution of etidronate dissolved in 3% sodium hypochlorite (continuous chelation). Microbiological samples were collected before and after root canal instrumentation and irrigation. Microbial analysis was performed using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Results: All protocols resulted in a reduction in microbial load. However, protocols using 3% sodium hypochlorite with 17% EDTA and continuous chelation with etidronate in sodium hypochlorite demonstrated a greater number of statistically significant reductions. Sequential irrigation with aqueous etidronate showed the lowest antimicrobial effectiveness. Conclusions: Continuous chelation with etidronate in 3% sodium hypochlorite showed promising antimicrobial performance and may represent a clinically feasible alternative irrigation strategy.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (PubChem CID 6049), etidronate (PubChem CID 3305), sodium hypochlorite (PubChem CID 23665760)
- **Diseases:** chronic apical periodontitis (MONDO:0001251)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** pulp necrosis (MESH:D003790), Apical periodontitis (MESH:D010485), periodontal (MESH:D010518), endodontic infections (MESH:D011671), erosion (MESH:D014077), infections (MESH:D007239), injury to (MESH:D014947), periodontal disease (MESH:D010510), caries (MESH:D003731), cracks (MESH:D003387)
- **Chemicals:** methylene blue (MESH:D008751), Etidronate (MESH:D012968), water (MESH:D014867), calcium hydroxide (MESH:D002126), calcium (MESH:D002118), aldehydes (MESH:D000447), EQ-S (-), fatty acids (MESH:D005227), nickel-titanium (MESH:C013616), chlorine (MESH:D002713), EDTA (MESH:D004492), NaOCl (MESH:D012973), lipid (MESH:D008055)
- **Species:** Clostridium perfringens (species) [taxon 1502], Canis lupus familiaris (dog, subspecies) [taxon 9615], Enterococcus faecalis (species) [taxon 1351], Priestia megaterium (species) [taxon 1404], Streptococcus mutans (species) [taxon 1309], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (species) [taxon 714], Porphyromonas gingivalis (species) [taxon 837]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13025918/full.md

## References

27 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13025918/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13025918