# Novel Insights into Carbapenem Resistance: Mechanisms, Diagnostics, and Future Directions

## TL;DR

This review explores how bacteria become resistant to carbapenem antibiotics, highlighting new mechanisms and diagnostic challenges in treating resistant infections.

## Contribution

The paper provides updated insights into molecular mechanisms and adaptive genome dynamics driving carbapenem resistance since 2020.

## Key findings

- Carbapenem resistance involves enzymatic and non-enzymatic mechanisms, including porin remodeling and efflux pump upregulation.
- New β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations exert distinct selective pressures, influencing resistance patterns.
- Cefiderocol resistance often involves impaired siderophore uptake and heteroresistance.

## Abstract

Carbapenems are essential for the treatment of severe infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria, particularly in critically ill and immunocompromised patients. However, the global rise of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii has significantly eroded their effectiveness, and the phenomenon is now recognized as a major public health threat. Resistance is driven by the complex and evolving interplay of enzymatic and non-enzymatic mechanisms, occurring within highly successful clonal lineages and mobile genetic platforms. This review summarizes advances since 2020 in the molecular basis of carbapenem resistance, integrating enzymatic mechanisms across Ambler classes A, B, C, and D with emerging non-enzymatic contributors, including porin remodeling, efflux pump upregulation, target-site alterations, and outer-membrane adaptations. Particular attention is given to adaptive genome dynamics, such as IS26-mediated gene amplification, plasmid multimerization, and heteroresistance, that generate unstable resistance phenotypes and complicate routine susceptibility testing. Newly introduced β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations exert distinct selective pressures: ceftazidime–avibactam favors KPC Ω-loop variants and permeability defects, often restoring carbapenem susceptibility, whereas meropenem–vaborbactam and imipenem–relebactam resistance is driven mainly by porin loss and β-lactamase gene amplification. Cefiderocol resistance is multifactorial, frequently involving impaired siderophore uptake and heteroresistance, while sulbactam–durlobactam remains active against OXA-producing A. baumannii but is compromised by metallo-β-lactamases and PBP3 alterations. Carbapenem resistance is increasingly characterized by convergent, multi-layered adaptations that undermine both established and novel therapies. While high-level randomized evidence remains limited for some resistance mechanisms, emerging mechanistic, microbiological, and clinical data support the need for mechanism-aware diagnostics, repeated susceptibility assessment during therapy, and stewardship strategies informed by resistance biology. Integrating molecular context into routine practice will be critical to preserving emerging treatment options and limiting the global impact of carbapenem resistance.