Treatment Priorities in Craniopharyngioma: Perspectives of Survivors and Caregivers
Nathalie Kayadjanian, Eugenie A. Hsu

TL;DR
This study explores the treatment priorities of craniopharyngioma survivors and their caregivers, highlighting key health challenges and differences in symptom importance.
Contribution
The study provides insights into real-world perspectives of CP survivors and caregivers on treatment priorities, which can guide drug development and care strategies.
Findings
Seventeen health challenges were identified as most important by over 50% of participants, including hypothalamic dysfunction and visual impairment.
Survivors prioritized fatigue and sleepiness more than caregivers, who emphasized obesity.
Temperature dysregulation was the only symptom not considered very or extremely important for new treatment development.
Abstract
Background/Objectives: While the number and severity of comorbidities affecting survivors of craniopharyngioma (CP) are well documented, little is known about the perspectives of caregivers and survivors regarding treatment priorities. This study aimed to describe the views of caregivers and self-reported survivors on the comorbidities that most significantly impact CP survivors and to identify areas where new treatments are most needed. Methods: Completed surveys of 161 participants recruited in the hypothalamic–pituitary brain tumor patient registry were analyzed. Results: Participants represented 40% caregivers (mostly children) and 60% adult CP survivors, with notable differences in disease duration, age, CP onset, and living conditions. Seventeen health challenges were identified as most important by more than 50% of participants, including symptoms characteristic of hypothalamic…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
- —Raymond A. Wood Foundation
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments · Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors · Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
1. Introduction
Craniopharyngioma (CP) is a rare epithelial tumor arising along the path of the craniopharyngeal duct. CP has an incidence of 0.5 to 2 cases per million persons per year, displaying a bimodal age distribution with peak incidence rates in childhood-onset at 5 to 14 years and adult-onset at 55 to 74 years [1]. CP treatment mainly comprises neurosurgery and radiotherapy.
Despite being classified as a benign tumor by the World Health Organization, CP is associated with a high degree of morbidity due to its infiltrative tendencies and anatomical proximity to pituitary gland, hypothalamus, optic pathways, the circle of Willis, and the third ventricle. Comorbidities resulting from the tumor and/or tumor treatment include panhypopituitarism, hypothalamic dysfunction, psychosocial problems, cognitive impairment, and visual deficits [2,3]. Hypothalamic dysfunction increases the risk of behavioral problems, sleep disorders, fatigue, and excessive daytime sleepiness [4,5,6], and leads to morbid hypothalamic obesity (HO) [7]. These physical and cognitive impairments can lead to poor academic and work performance, as well as disrupted family and social relationships [8]. In addition, survivors often require lifelong medication and ongoing medical care, further impacting daily life and independence [9]. The cumulative burden of physical, cognitive, and psychosocial issues leads to a significantly reduced health-related quality-of-life [5,10,11,12,13,14], and the lowest quality of life scores of any pediatric brain tumor [15]. Survivor polysymptomatology also predicts and incurs significant caregiver burden [13].
Little is known about the views of CP survivors and caregivers on the most impactful comorbidities and priorities for new therapy development. The collection and integration of the patient- or proxy-reported patient experience, values and preferences into drug development and the regulatory decision-making process have become a priority of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [16], other regulatory authorities [17] and payers. Incorporating the perspectives of patients and caregivers into the drug development process can improve understanding of patient priorities, inform trial design, and support clinical trial outcome measures that translate into meaningful quality-of-life benefits. These efforts may enhance understanding of the impact of treatments on survivors’ conditions and treatment outcomes, thereby enabling more informed assessment and decision-making by regulators, health technology assessment (HTA) bodies, healthcare professionals, and patients themselves.
The study aimed to describe, for the first time, the priorities of caregivers and survivors regarding post-CP comorbidities and targets for future treatments. The objective was to obtain real-world evidence-based data on the perspectives of CP survivors and caregivers to inform the selection of symptom targets for future therapeutic development, the choice of outcome measures, and regulatory decision-making.
2. Materials and Methods
Registry
The hypothalamic–pituitary brain tumors patient registry (“registry”) was launched in May 2024. The registry is web-based and hosted on the National Organization for Rare Disorders (NORD) “IAMRARE” registry platform. The registry is compliant with US Health Information Privacy Laws, FDA regulations on electronic records, and the security requirements of the European Union General Data Protection Regulation. Registry data is only accessed by registry study personnel. All protocols, surveys, and recruitment materials have been reviewed and approved by a Central Institutional Review Board (North Star Review Board, # NB400191). The registry is governed by the Raymond A. Wood Foundation (RAWF) Registry Advisory Board members who represent stakeholders in the hypothalamic–pituitary tumors and rare disease communities, including survivors, caregivers, clinicians, and experts in registry development and governance. The registry is composed of surveys that are built in the registry in an incremental fashion to serve specific research projects and minimize the burden on participants. The present study surveys were in English and accessible worldwide.
Participants
Study participants were recruited via mass communications using RAWF’s channels, registry, support groups, and outreach to clinical and professional communities. Registry participants consisted of adult survivors (≥18) able to self-report and caregivers of survivors under 18 or adults unable to self-report. The study population included exclusively survivors who were diagnosed with CP and who completed all registry surveys between January and June 2025. Data from 161 participants were included in the study analyses, of which 40% (N = 64) represented caregiver-reported data and 60% (N = 97) represented self-reported data from survivors themselves.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This research study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, reviewed and approved in accordance with applicable US Federal regulations governing the protection of human subjects (e.g., 45 CFR part 46, and/or 21 CFR parts 50 and 56), and approved by the Central Institutional Review Board (North Star Review Board, # NB400191). All legal guardians/legally authorized representatives of CP survivors, and survivors themselves, completed an informed consent.
Clinical Characteristics of CP Survivors
Participants were asked to provide various information including date of birth, date of CP tumor diagnosis, HO diagnosis, and ongoing health challenges affecting CP survivors.
Health challenges and symptoms
To assess the ongoing post-CP sequelae symptoms and health challenges, we generated a list of 62 health issues from commonly reported symptoms [18], in addition to those that were rarely reported in the literature but frequently mentioned by caregivers and survivors in CP support groups [13]. We used the Human Phenotype Ontology that provides a standardized vocabulary to describe phenotypic abnormalities encountered in CP (https://hpo.jax.org/). The term central diabetes insipidus (DI), well known amongst the patient community, was used in this survey instead of the newly accepted denomination of arginine vasopressin deficiency (AVPD) [19].
Symptoms of importance and treatment priorities
Registry participants were asked to select the health challenges and symptoms that (1) had the greatest impact on CP survivors, (2) had the most negative impact on the survivor’s daily activities (e.g., not being able to work or do house chores), and (3) had (or anticipated to possibly have) the most negative impact on the survivor’s ability to achieve long-term goals as a result of CP. They were then asked to rate the level of importance for developing a new treatment for that symptom on a 5-point Likert scale (1: not important at all, 2: slightly important, 3: moderately important, 4: very important, 5: extremely important). Because of the heterogeneity of clinical manifestations of CP survivors, we expressed results in function of those who experienced them.
Statistical Analyses
Descriptive statistics are presented as counts (N), percentages, mean (SD), and median. Analyses comparing groups across health challenges were exploratory and did not adjust for the multiplicity of health challenges. Group differences between caregiver-reports and self-reports for the number of ongoing health challenges and the perceived importance for developing new treatments for specific health challenges were assessed using an independent Mann–Whitney test. Effect sizes were reported as a rank biserial correlation, and were categorized as trivial (<0.2), small (0.2–0.49), moderate (0.5–0.79), or large (≥0.8) [20]. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the association between caregiver-reports and self-reports and the health challenges affecting CP survivors. A p value ≤ 0.050 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using JASP Team (2025) (version 0.95.3).
3. Results
3.1. Demographics of CP Survivors
Caregivers reported on 64 CP survivors consisting mostly of children (N = 50, 78%) and some adults (N = 14, 22%). Self-reports represented 97 CP survivors, all of whom were adults (Table 1). Consequently, the median survivor age reported by caregivers was 13 years, compared to 25 years in self-reported survivors.There were more self-reported adult female than male survivors (69% versus 31% survivors). In contrast, sex distribution was more balanced in the caregiver-report group (53% females and 47% males).CP survivors were mostly of White ethnic background (91.25%), and residing in the United States (81%). Most survivors were single (66%), primarily living with family-of-origin when reported by caregivers (88%), or outside of family-of-origin when self-reported by adults.The vast majority of caregiver-reported survivors (82%) received special education or support at school, whereas the majority of self-reported adults did not (72%).
3.2. Clinical Characteristics of CP Survivors
3.2.1. CP and HO Diagnoses
CP diagnosis. The age at tumor diagnosis was significantly different between caregiver-reports and self-reports (U = 1129.5, p < 0.001) (Table 2). Most survivors reported by caregivers had childhood-onset CP. In contrast, self-reported adult survivors had a mixed childhood- and adult-onset CP.Disease duration. The time that has passed since CP diagnosis was significantly longer for self-reported adults compared to caregiver-reported survivors (U = 1830, p < 0.001) (Table 2).HO diagnosis. In total, 41% and 46% of survivors reported by caregivers and self received HO diagnosis, respectively, a proportion similar to what has been published in other studies [21,22]. The age of HO diagnosis was significantly different between caregiver-reports and self-reports (U = 223, p < 0.001) (Table 2).
3.2.2. Most Frequent Health Challenges
Caregiver-reports and self-reports reported a mean (SD) of 13.52 (6.78) and 14.14 (8.43) ongoing symptoms or health challenges affecting survivors, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups (U = 3.08, p = 0.942).The health challenges most frequently experienced by more than 50% survivors were hypothyroidism, fatigue, growth hormone deficiency, central adrenal insufficiency, AVPD, temperature dysregulation, obesity, and excessive daytime sleepiness, with no statistical differences between caregiver-reported and self-reported CP survivors (Table 3). In contrast, self-reported adult survivors were significantly and more frequently affected by sex hormone deficiency (70%) compared to caregiver-reported CP survivors (53%). Amongst the other health challenges and symptoms that affected more than 30% CP survivors (Table 3), decreased libido (42% versus 3%) and polydipsia (33% versus 11%) affected self-reported adults more significantly and more frequently than caregiver-reported CP survivors, respectively.
3.3. Most Impactful Symptoms
3.3.1. Overall Impact
Seventeen health challenges were selected as symptoms with the greatest adverse impact by more than 50% of registry participants. The most impactful challenges encompassed signs and symptoms typical of hypothalamic syndrome, such as fatigue, sleep disorder, hyperphagia, obesity, temperature dysregulation, endocrine dysfunction, and emotional and behavioral problems [23]. In addition, neurological problems and visual impairment were reported as highly impactful symptoms on CP survivors (Table 4). There were no significant differences between the two groups except for polydipsia, which had a greater impact on self-reported than caregiver-reported CP survivors.
3.3.2. Day-to-Day or Long-Term Impact
Most symptoms and health challenges had the most adverse impact on the survivor’s daily activities (Table 5). One exception was the decreased libido, reported by only two caregivers of CP adult survivors, for whom the long-term impact was more important. Notably, caregivers reported that abnormal social behavior, overweight, and visual impairment had an impact on both daily and anticipated long-term activities. Similarly, adult survivors self-reported an adverse impact of abnormal social behavior on both daily and long-term activities.
3.4. Treatment Priorities
Participants rated the development of new treatments for the most impactful symptoms affecting CP survivors as very or extremely important, except for temperature dysregulation, which was rated as only relatively or moderately important (Table 6). Caregivers and CP survivors generally agreed on treatment priorities. Of note, CP survivors assigned a modest but significantly greater priority to the development of new treatments for fatigue and excessive daytime sleepiness compared to caregivers. Conversely, the development of treatments for obesity was assigned a slightly, yet significantly, greater importance by caregivers.
4. Discussion
This real-world evidence study described the perspectives of adult survivors and caregivers of predominantly pediatric survivors on the most impactful comorbidities and priorities for new treatments. Seventeen symptoms or health challenges were identified as most important by more than 50% of participants. Notably, symptom importance did not mirror symptom prevalence. In addition to the symptoms associated with hypothalamic syndrome, neurological issues and visual impairment also had significant impacts on CP survivors, mostly on survivors’ daily activities. Amongst the 17 health challenges, all but temperature dysregulation were selected as top priorities for the development of new treatments. Despite differences in age, disease duration, living conditions, and role, both groups showed broad agreement, except for polydipsia, which was reported as significantly more impactful by the adult survivor group than by the caregiver group. This study highlights critical unmet needs identified by survivors and caregivers, providing direction for future treatment development in CP.
The prevalence of symptoms described by study participants is in agreement with findings reported in the literature [2,13,18,24,25], supporting the reliability of participants’ reports. The polysymptomatology affecting CP survivors is heterogeneous and depends on the tumor’s size, location, and its treatment. Accordingly, we examined which symptoms were prioritized by those who experienced them. Interestingly, we observed a clear distinction between symptom prevalence and perceived importance. Although hypothyroidism, growth hormone deficiency, and sex hormone deficiency were among the four most frequently reported conditions, they were not ranked among the top 17 symptoms of importance. In contrast, AVPD and central adrenal insufficiency (CAI) were prioritized as important. Although hypopituitary conditions are treated with hormone replacement, differences in their impact on daily life may explain why certain symptoms, but not others, were prioritized by survivors and caregivers.
Several hypotheses may explain the importance of CAI and AVPD. CAI is treated through glucocorticoid replacement. However, the life-threatening risk of adrenal crisis renders its management painstaking and lowers the quality of life [26,27,28]. The need for strict stress-dose education and emergency preparedness imposes ongoing cognitive, emotional, and behavioral demands on both patients and caregivers [28,29]. AVPD, characterized by hypotonic polyuria and polydipsia [30,31], requires lifelong AVP replacement therapy [10,32], and its management necessitates frequent, throughout-the-day engagement by patients and caregivers [33]. Hormonal replacement needs fluctuate in response to illness and lifestyle factors that alter temperature and fluid balance (e.g., heat exposure, physical activity, salt intake, stress), further complicating management and increasing the burden of care. Frequent plasma sodium monitoring, particularly in infants, young children, and survivors with adipsia, is essential to guide hydration and mitigate the risk of electrolyte imbalance (hypernatremia and hyponatremia) and their potentially life-threatening complications [10]. Future research should delineate which features of CAI and AVPD most significantly impact survivors.
Most of the 17 selected symptoms are associated with hypothalamic dysfunction, likely reflecting hypothalamic syndrome (HS), a complex clinical disorder characterizing by endocrine deficits, disordered eating, sudden weight changes, fatigue, temperature dysregulation, and a wide range of cognitive, sleep-related, and psychosocial abnormalities [7,23,34]. HS severely impacts the quality of life of both survivors [35,36] and caregivers [13,37]. Its management remains a significant challenge for clinicians [38] and presents daily difficulties for both survivors and caregivers, as highlighted in this study. Symptoms such as sleep dysregulation, fatigue, cognitive impairment, emotional lability, hyperphagia, obesity, and social impairment all pose barriers to quality of life, including the attainment and retention of relationships, educational and vocational goals, independent living, and the overall engagement with life [12,39,40,41,42,43]. Although our study did not examine the relationship between tumor characteristics, treatment, and clinical manifestations, our findings are consistent with the literature [38] and underscore the importance of addressing HS-related challenges from the perspectives of CP survivors and caregivers. The complexity of HS, along with the lack of comprehensive outcome measures that capture its multisystemic nature, likely contributes to the paucity of clinical trials beyond obesity and represents a major gap in therapeutic development for HS. The present findings should encourage future research aimed at addressing this major challenge.
In our cohort, fatigue and disordered sleep (i.e., excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), nighttime sleep abnormalities) were identified as two of the four most important and impactful symptoms affecting daily life. While the underlying reasons for the pronounced significance attributed to these symptoms remain hypothetical, one possibility is that survivors experiencing disordered sleep may demonstrate impaired attention, reduced academic and work productivity, increased accident risk [44], and diminished cognitive capacities [44]. Although EDS and nighttime sleep abnormalities may manifest independently of fatigue, they may converge in the shared consequence of limiting the survivor’s overall engagement with life. Given the substantial day-to-day impact of fatigue and disordered sleep, future research prioritizing these issues should be considered a high priority for research and intervention.
Emotional lability and cognitive deficits emerged as the two most important symptoms for caregivers of affected survivors. Mood lability is likely highly impactful due to the management demands it poses [12,45]. By introducing persistent unpredictability, increasing behavioral management demands, disrupting family functioning, and necessitating sustained advocacy across healthcare, educational, and social systems, it is unsurprising that emotional lability is considered the most important symptom by caregivers. Cognitive impairment includes poor attention and short-term memory, and slowed processing speed and executive dysfunction [10,46,47,48], and it significantly mediates reduced adaptive functioning and independent living [49,50], possibly causing a potential lifelong caregiving burden on families [36]. Abnormal social behaviors were also included in this constellation of neuropsychological symptoms. Interestingly, social behaviors had an impact on both daily activities and the achievement of long-term goals. Although speculative, emotional lability, cognitive deficits, and abnormal social behaviors may compromise academic and vocational performance and relationships, requiring caregivers to provide extensive advocacy, coordinate accommodations and therapies, and manage the downstream consequences. Further studies should further explore how these deficits impact the perspectives of caregivers of CP survivors.
Besides reducing adaptive functioning [12], many symptoms and health challenges associated with HS result in disabilities or issues that are frequently overlooked in routine clinical practice. Sudden body changes as a result of CP like HO may alter body perception [49], lower self-esteem, and adversely affect intimacy, including sexual relationships [51]. Similarly, beyond the metabolic consequences of hyperphagia—which can lead to morbid obesity and cardiovascular comorbidities [51]—hyperphagia is accompanied by behaviors that affect all aspects of survivors’ lives [13,52,53,54] and impose a substantial burden on caregivers [13]. Children can be stigmatized because of their hyperphagia and may experience difficulties in forming friendships with their peers at school as a result of extreme food-seeking behaviors [52]. Further analyses exploring the multi-dimensional impact of these health challenges on the lives of survivors are warranted.
Our study has several limitations. First, it is cross-sectional and does not capture the trajectory of perceived treatment priorities and symptom impact over time, making causal conclusions challenging. Second, the sociodemographics of the study participants are not representative of broad ethnic groups and mostly represent persons living in the United States, limiting the generalizability of our findings. Third, our recruitment strategy may have favored participants more engaged in advocacy or survivors with more severe symptoms. Fourth, the list of health challenges and symptoms is descriptive, and further validation would be warranted. Lastly, as our study is primarily descriptive, the differences between the caregiver and survivor groups in age, disease duration, developmental stage, living conditions, and roles preclude drawing any direct causal inferences between the two groups.
Despite the disparities between the two groups, there was substantial concordance regarding the symptoms deemed important and the prioritization of treatment. Given that CP sequelae are lifelong [10,53] and that hypothalamic dysfunction is associated with worse outcomes in both pediatric [54] and adult survivors [55], the overlapping perspectives likely reflect the universality of challenges faced by all CP survivors. These findings reinforce our previous results, which demonstrated that the number and type of comorbidities are key determinants of survivors’ quality of life and caregiver burden [13]. Notably, we did not find differences in the number of health challenges affecting survivors between the two groups. The only significant difference between the two groups was for polydipsia, which adult survivors identified as an important symptom four times more often than caregivers. These findings highlight the need for further research on the impact of polydipsia in adult survivors to determine whether factors such as disease duration, living conditions, or divergent perspectives between caregivers and survivors contribute to the greater impact reported by the adult survivor group.
5. Conclusions
Perspectives from caregivers and adult survivors, as collected from the hypothalamic–pituitary brain tumor patient registry, provide invaluable real-world evidence regarding the lived experiences following CP. Understanding the viewpoints of those directly affected by the severity and impact of comorbidities is a critical step toward guiding the development of therapies that are truly meaningful to CP survivors and their caregivers.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Müller H.L. Craniopharyngioma Handb. Clin. Neurol.201412423525310.1210/er.2013-111525248591 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Pedreira C.C. Stargatt R. Maroulis H. Rosenfeld J. Maixner W. Warne G.L. Zacharin M.R. Health related quality of life and psychological outcome in patients treated for craniopharyngioma in childhood J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab.200619152410.1515/JPEM.2006.19.1.1516509524 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Bereket A. Postoperative and Long-Term Endocrinologic Complications of Craniopharyngioma Horm. Res. Paediatr.20209349750910.1159/00051534733794526 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4van Schaik J. Hoving E.W. Müller H.L. van Santen H.M. Hypothalamic-Pituitary Outcome after Treatment for Childhood Craniopharyngioma Front. Horm. Res.202154475710.1159/00051531833965963 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Klages K.L. Berlin K.S. Cook J.L. Merchant T.E. Wise M.S. Mandrell B.N. Conklin H.M. Crabtree V.M. Health-related quality of life, obesity, fragmented sleep, fatigue, and psychosocial problems among youth with craniopharyngioma Psychooncology 20223177978710.1002/pon.586234859518 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Müller H.L. Witte J. Surmann B. Batram M. Braegelmann K. Flume M. Beckhaus J. Touchot N. Friedrich C. Treatment of patients with tumor/treatment-related hypothalamic obesity in the first two years following surgical treatment or radiotherapy Sci. Rep.202515211810.1038/s 41598-025-85262-139814823 PMC 11736136 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7van Santen H.M. Müller H.L. Management of Acquired Hypothalamic Dysfunction and the Hypothalamic Syndrome; It Is More Than Obesity Endocr. Rev.20254689190710.1210/endrev/bnaf 02540746184 PMC 12640713 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Karavitaki N. Wass J.A. Non-adenomatous pituitary tumours Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.20092365166510.1016/j.beem.2009.05.00719945029 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
