# Antimicrobial Use and Resistance: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Broiler Farmers in Mzimba, Malawi

**Authors:** Abel Compbel Chipembo, Goliath Eneya Zulu, Precious Innocent Mastala, Sam Mvula, Thomas S. G. Malinki, Wilson Friday, Martin Kalumbi, Alberto Pondja, Janelisa Musaya, Belisário Moiane, Niura Madalena Bila

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics15030239 · Antibiotics · 2026-02-25

## TL;DR

This study examines how chicken farmers in Malawi use antimicrobials and their understanding of antimicrobial resistance, finding significant gaps in knowledge and practices.

## Contribution

The study provides new insights into antimicrobial use and resistance awareness among poultry farmers in Mzimba, Malawi.

## Key findings

- Only about 40-50% of farmers showed good knowledge, attitudes, or practices regarding antimicrobial use.
- Training significantly improved knowledge and practices related to antimicrobial use and resistance.
- All farmers obtained antimicrobials without consulting veterinarians, and none were aware of AMR policies.

## Abstract

Background: The use of antimicrobials in chicken is well-known worldwide. However, the motivating factors towards the use of antimicrobials by poultry farmers are not well-known. Furthermore, awareness of antimicrobial resistance and how such factors can lead to AMR in bacterial poultry pathogens, particularly those isolated from chicken meat in Mzimba district, is not well-documented. Objective: To evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices about the use of antimicrobials among chicken farmers in the Mzimba district, Malawi. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 89 chicken farmers in Mzimba to assess their knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) related to AMU and AMR. Data analysis was performed using STATA version 15, applying linear regression and Pearson correlation analysis for KAP scores. Results: Among the chicken farmers, 46.1%, 43.8%, and 42.7% demonstrated good knowledge, attitudes, and practices, respectively. Training on AMU and AMR was significantly associated with knowledge (p = 0.002) and practices (p = 0.02). There were weak relationships among knowledge, attitudes, and practices scores, with p-values of 0.2, 0.07, and −0.05. There were gaps in coordination between veterinarians and farmers, and all farmers (100%) obtained antimicrobials from veterinary shops without consulting veterinarians. Farmers were not aware of policies related to AMR and AMU. Conclusions: Chicken farmers exhibited low KAP levels on AMU and AMR. This situation constitutes an emergency of AMR and therefore underscores the need for policy development targeted towards enforcing regulations and improving KAP through trainings programs on AMU, AMR, and the importance of consulting veterinarians in chicken production.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** HIV/AIDS (MESH:D015658), injury to (MESH:D014947), infection (MESH:D007239), bacterial infections (MESH:D001424), Diseases (MESH:D004194), AMR (MESH:D060467), AMR (MESH:C565965), viral diseases (MESH:D014777), cancer (MESH:D009369), MR (MESH:D008944), infectious diseases (MESH:D003141), fever (MESH:D005334), Poison (MESH:D011041), allergic reactions (MESH:D004342)
- **Chemicals:** Egocine (-), Oxytetracycline (MESH:D010118), amoxicillin (MESH:D000658), Tetracyclines (MESH:D013754), quinolone (MESH:D015363), macrolides (MESH:D018942), sulfonamides (MESH:D013449), aminoglycoside (MESH:D000617), polypeptides (MESH:D010455), tetracycline (MESH:D013752), Bactrim (MESH:D015662)
- **Species:** Syzygium cumini (jaman, species) [taxon 260142], Bacteria Latreille et al. 1825 (Bacteria stick insect, genus) [taxon 629395], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Gallus gallus (bantam, species) [taxon 9031], Persea americana (avocado, species) [taxon 3435], Salmonella (genus) [taxon 590], Escherichia coli (E. coli, species) [taxon 562], Psidium guajava (guava, species) [taxon 120290], Eucalyptus (genus) [taxon 3932]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13024035/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13024035/full.md

## References

47 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13024035/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13024035