# Impact of surgeon caseload, case mix, and team composition on gender disparities in cholecystectomy outcomes

**Authors:** My Blohm, Riccardo LoMartire, Gabriel Sandblom, Lars Enochsson, Johanna Österberg

PMC · DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf179 · BJS Open · 2026-03-27

## TL;DR

This study finds that female surgeons have better outcomes in cholecystectomy, even after adjusting for factors like experience and team composition.

## Contribution

The study identifies persistent gender disparities in surgical outcomes after accounting for surgeon caseload, case mix, and team composition.

## Key findings

- Female surgeons had fewer complications across all experience levels.
- Inexperienced male surgeons had a higher risk of bile duct injury.
- Teams with only male surgeons had the highest complication rates.

## Abstract

Previous research has suggested that female surgeons achieve better outcomes in various procedures, but the underlying reasons remain unclear. This study aimed to explore potential explanations for observed gender disparities in cholecystectomy outcomes.

A follow-up analysis was conducted using a previously reported population-based cohort from the Swedish Registry of Gallstone Surgery. All patients who underwent cholecystectomy in Sweden between 2007 and 2019 were included, with a subgroup (2017–2019) analysed for case mix. The association between surgeon gender and outcomes was assessed, considering caseload, case mix, team composition, and surgeon–patient gender dynamics.

The analysis included 150 509 cholecystectomies performed by 2555 surgeons (849 women, 1706 men). Female surgeons had fewer complications across all experience categories. The gender disparity in bile duct injuries was most notable among male surgeons with < 3 years of experience (risk ratio 1.77, 95% confidence interval 1.30 to 2.40). After adjusting for case mix, male surgeons had higher risks of surgical complications (risk ratio 1.28, 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 1.45), bile duct injuries (risk ratio 1.63, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 2.62), and total complications (risk ratio 1.10, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.19), but shorter operating times. Teams with only male surgeons had the highest complication rates. Women experienced the best outcomes when treated by female surgeons.

Female surgeons were associated with more favourable cholecystectomy outcomes. These differences persisted after accounting for caseload, case mix, and team composition. Inexperienced male surgeons had a higher risk of bile duct injury, underscoring the importance of rigorous mentorship during the early years of practice.

This follow-up study examined gender disparities in cholecystectomy outcomes in a Swedish cohort, accounting for surgeon caseload, case mix, and team composition. Female surgeons achieved better outcomes even after adjustment, whereas low-volume male surgeons and all-male teams showed higher risks of bile duct injury.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** bleeding (MESH:D006470), cholecystitis (MESH:D002764), trauma (MESH:D014947), bile leakage (MESH:D003763), urinary tract infections (MESH:D014552), visceral organ injury (MESH:D009102), acute cholecystitis (MESH:D041881), Gallstone (MESH:D042882), abscesses (MESH:D000038), cancer (MESH:D009369), cholecystectomies (MESH:D017562), pulmonary and cardiac complications (MESH:D006331), blood loss (MESH:D016063), pain (MESH:D010146), complication (MESH:D008107), CVD (MESH:D002318), wound infections (MESH:D014946), thrombosis (MESH:D013927), Bile duct injuries (MESH:D001649), colon cancer (MESH:D015179), COVID-19 (MESH:D000086382), COPD (MESH:D029424), diabetes (MESH:D003920)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13023730/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13023730/full.md

## References

44 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13023730/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13023730