Risk factors for progression of supraspinatus tear size and fatty infiltration in nonsurgically treated rotator cuff tears
Yoshihiro Nakamura, Shin Yokoya, Yohei Harada, Chikara Watanabe, Shuhei Matsumura, Takahiko Hamasaki, Eisaku Fujimoto, Nobuo Adachi

TL;DR
This study identifies risk factors for worsening rotator cuff tears and fatty infiltration in patients not undergoing surgery.
Contribution
The study identifies subscapularis fatty infiltration as an independent risk factor for supraspinatus tear progression during nonsurgical treatment.
Findings
Subscapularis fatty infiltration grade ≥2 is an independent predictor of supraspinatus tear size progression.
Initial tear size and subscapularis fatty infiltration are strongly associated with fatty infiltration progression.
Monitoring subscapularis involvement can help identify patients at higher risk for tear progression.
Abstract
There is no clear information on structural changes of rotator cuff tears during nonsurgical management. In particular, the risk factors for the progression of tear size and fatty infiltration still remain poorly understood. Identifying such factors is essential for optimizing treatment strategies and follow-up planning. We retrospectively examined 80 shoulders (43 men, 37 women; mean age, 68.4 years) with partial- and full-thickness rotator cuff tears treated nonsurgically. All patients underwent initial and follow-up magnetic resonance imaging examinations at ≥12 months, with a mean follow-up of 22.2 ± 12.6 months. Progression of supraspinatus (SSP) tear size was defined as a mediolateral increase of ≥10 mm or ≥5 mm/yr, and progression of SSP fatty infiltration was defined as an increase in the modified Goutallier classification. Univariate analyses were conducted to determine…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsShoulder Injury and Treatment · Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology · Hip disorders and treatments
Introduction
A rotator cuff tear is among the most common causes of shoulder pain and functional limitation in adults. However, the optimal treatment approach remains controversial, because some tears are asymptomatic and several symptomatic cases demonstrate improvement in pain and range of motion with conservative management.14^,^17^,^21^,^35 Moreover, surgical indications are not standardized, and treatment decisions often vary among surgeons.6^,^34 Conservative treatment is frequently chosen as the initial approach because a substantial proportion of patients achieve symptomatic relief and functional improvement, although reported success rates vary widely across studies.14^,^16^,^17^,^21 Surgical repair may be undertaken when conservative management fails to provide adequate improvement. Large or massive tears are strongly associated with poorer surgical outcomes and higher rates of repair failure.3^,^13^,^30 Furthermore, structural changes within the rotator cuff muscles, such as atrophy and fatty infiltration, are well-recognized prognostic factors that influence post-operative outcomes.3^,^10 When either the tear size or fatty infiltration progresses considerably during nonsurgical management, the tear may become irreparable by the time surgical intervention is undertaken. Despite the clinical significance of this issue, there is a lack of clear understanding of the natural course of tear enlargement and fatty infiltration in conservatively managed rotator cuff tears. Therefore, it is essential to identify the risk factors for progression to guide treatment decisions and optimize patient outcomes. Accordingly, this study was conducted to explore the risk factors for the progression of tear size and fatty infiltration in patients with rotator cuff tears who received nonsurgical management, specifically focusing on the supraspinatus (SSP) tendon, the most commonly torn tendon of the rotator cuff.
Materials and methods
Study population
This study was approved by the institutional ethics committee (EPI-734). We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients diagnosed on magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] with partial- or full-thickness SSP tendon tears between 2010 and 2014. Shoulders with SSP fatty infiltration grade 4 on the modified Goutallier classification at the initial MRI examination were excluded due to end-staged degeneration. All patients received nonsurgical management consisting of anti-inflammatory analgesics, steroid injections, hyaluronic acid injections, or a combination of these treatments. Surgical repair was recommended when symptoms persisted after at least 3 months of nonsurgical care, and patients who declined surgery continued nonsurgical care and were included. Nonsurgical management was discontinued when the patients became asymptomatic, meaning the absence of pain and no clinically relevant limitation in shoulder range of motion, after which they were placed under regular follow-up. Follow-up MRI was required at ≥12 months after the initial scan. Exclusion criteria consisted of previous surgery on the affected shoulder, proximal humeral fracture, osteoarthritis, septic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, cervical spondylotic amyotrophy, and neuromuscular disease. Finally, 80 shoulders of 80 patients (43 men, 37 women; mean age, 68.4 ± 8.2 years) with a mean follow-up of 22.2 ± 12.6 (range, 12-50) months were enrolled.
Magnetic resonance imaging acquisition
All MRI examinations were conducted on a 1.5-T system (Signa, GE Medical Systems, or Excelart Vantage, Toshiba). Patients underwent MRI in the supine position with the arm at the side and the palm facing upward. The protocol included oblique coronal T2-weighted, axial T2-weighted, and oblique sagittal T1- and T2-weighted sequences. The same scanner was used for the initial and follow-up examinations in each patient.
Evaluation
Several imaging parameters were examined on both initial and follow-up MRI examinations, and changes between time points were recorded. Tear size of the SSP tendon was measured on oblique coronal T2-weighted images as the mediolateral retraction distance from the lateral edge of the greater tuberosity to the torn tendon edge, and this method was applied to both partial- and full-thickness tears. Tear size of the SSP tendon was then classified into the following 4 categories: partial-thickness, small full-thickness (≤1 cm), medium full-thickness (> 1 to ≤3 cm), and large/massive full-thickness (>3 cm).4 Subscapularis (SSC) tendon tears were diagnosed using axial T2-weighted images. A partial tear was defined based on high signal intensity in the superior portion of the tendon without full-thickness involvement, whereas a complete tear was defined as detachment at the insertion site. Infraspinatus (ISP) tendon tears were identified on oblique sagittal T2-weighted images when a full-thickness tear involved any portion of the middle facet. Fatty infiltration of the SSC, SSP and ISP was evaluated using the modified Goutallier classification on oblique sagittal T1-weighted images, using the most lateral slice contacting both the scapular spine and body.8^,^11 The critical shoulder angle (CSA) was measured on the initial standardized true anteroposterior radiographs of the shoulder.26 Moreover, the presence of shoulder pain at the time of follow-up MRI was recorded from clinical documentation. Tear size progression of the SSP tendon was defined on follow-up MRI as either (1) an absolute increase of ≥10 mm compared with the initial MRI or (2) an increase of ≥5 mm/yr of follow-up; meeting either criterion was considered tear progression. This definition was used to minimize the influence of differences in follow-up duration among patients. Fatty infiltration progression of the SSP was defined as an increase in the modified Goutallier classification grade at follow-up.
Statistical analysis
Comparisons of SSP tear size and fatty infiltration between initial and follow-up MRI examinations were conducted using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to evaluate differences in age, follow-up period, and CSA between progression and nonprogression cases for the progression of tear size and fatty infiltration, respectively. Fisher exact test was performed for evaluating categorical variables, including sex, initial tear size category, SSC and ISP tear status, initial fatty infiltration of the SSC, SSP, and ISP, and the presence of persistent pain at follow-up, between progression and nonprogression cases for the progression of both tear size and fatty infiltration. P < .05 was considered statistically significant. Variables with significant differences in univariate analyses were entered into separate multivariate logistic regression models for identifying independent predictors of progression of tear size and SSP fatty infiltration. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. All statistical analyses were performed using EZR (Easy R; Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan), which serves as a graphical user interface for R (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
Results
The SSP tear size increased from 18.2 ± 12.1 mm at the initial MRI to 23.0 ± 13.6 mm on the follow-up MRI (P < .001), with a mean progression of 4.8 ± 6.2 mm, corresponding to 3.3 ± 5.5 mm/yr. The SSP fatty infiltration grade progressed from 1.8 ± 0.6 at the initial MRI to 2.0 ± 0.8 on the follow-up MRI (P < .001).
Progression of SSP tear size
In the univariate comparisons between SSP tear size progression and nonprogression cases, significant differences in the initial tear size category and SSC fatty infiltration were observed between groups. The CSA was significantly larger in the progression cases. Age, sex, follow-up period, SSC tear status, ISP tear, SSP fatty infiltration, ISP fatty infiltration, or the presence of persistent pain at follow-up showed no significant differences (Table I). On the basis of these results, the following 3 factors were included in the multivariate model: medium-sized tear, SSC fatty infiltration grade ≥ 2, and CSA. In the post hoc pairwise Fisher exact test, medium-sized tears showed P values of <.1 compared with all other tear size categories, and SSC fatty infiltration grades ≥ 2 showed P values of <.1 compared with grades 0-1. Hence, medium-sized tear and SSC fatty infiltration grade ≥ 2 were selected as representative variables for the multivariate logistic regression analysis, which identified medium-sized tears (OR, 17.1; 95% CI, 4.3-68.3; P < .001) and SSC fatty infiltration grade ≥ 2 (OR, 8.1; 95% CI, 1.7-38.5; P = .009) as independent risk factors for tear progression, whereas CSA was not significant (Table II).Table IComparison between supraspinatus tear size progression and nonprogression cases.Tear size progression (n = 24)Tear size nonprogression (n = 56)P valueAge (yr)70.8 ± 5.067.3 ± 9.1.19Sex.46 Male45.8%57.1% Female54.2%42.9%Follow-up period (mo)21.7 ± 12.323.3 ± 13.6.85Initial tear size category**<.001** Partial0%46.4% Small4.2%8.9% Medium79.2%21.4% Large/massive16.7%23.2%Initial SSC tear.13 Intact41.7%62.5% Partial29.2%25.0% Complete29.2%12.5% Initial ISP tear20.8%14.3%.52Initial fatty infiltration SSC**.004** 0-158.3%89.3% 225.0%7.1% 3-416.7%3.6%Initial fatty infiltration SSP.35 0-116.7%32.1% 275.0%58.9% 38.3%8.9%Initial fatty infiltration ISP.17 0-175.0%89.3% 216.7%8.9% 3-48.3%1.8% CSA (°)36.8 ± 3.734.6 ± 4.1**.013** Pain at follow-up62.5%53.6%.62CSA, critical shoulder angle; ISP, infraspinatus; SSC, subscapularis; SSP, supraspinatus.Bold values indicate statistical significance (P < .05).Table IIMultivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors associated with tear size progression.OR95% CIP valueMedium-sized tear17.14.3-68.3**<.001SSC fatty infiltration ≥ grade 28.11.7-38.5.009**CSA1.11.0-1.3.20CI, confidence interval; CSA, critical shoulder angle; OR, odds ratio; SSC, subscapularis.Bold values indicate statistical significance (P < .05).
Progression of SSP fatty infiltration
In the univariate comparisons of SSP fatty infiltration between progression and nonprogression cases, the initial tear size category, SSC tear, and SSC fatty infiltration exhibited significant differences between groups. Age was significantly higher and CSA was also significantly larger in progression cases. Sex, follow-up period, ISP tear, SSP fatty infiltration, ISP fatty infiltration, or the presence of persistent pain at follow-up showed no significant differences (Table III). Based on these findings, the following 5 factors were entered into the multivariate model: age, medium-sized tear, SSC complete tear, SSC fatty infiltration grade ≥ 2, and CSA. In the post hoc pairwise Fisher exact test, medium-sized tears compared with partial-thickness tears, SSC complete tears compared with intact SSC, and SSC fatty infiltration grade ≥ 2 compared with grades 0-1 all showed P values of <.1. Hence, we selected medium-sized tear, SSC complete tear, and SSC fatty infiltration grade ≥ 2 as representative variables for the multivariate logistic regression analysis, which identified SSC fatty infiltration grade ≥ 2 (OR, 10.4; 95% CI, 1.7-64.1; P = .01) as an independent risk factor for the progression of SSP fatty infiltration, whereas age, medium-sized tear, SSC complete tear, and CSA were not significant (Table IV).Table IIIComparison between supraspinatus fatty infiltration progression and nonprogression cases.Fatty infiltration progression (n = 14)Fatty infiltration nonprogression (n = 66)P valueAge (yr)72.4 ± 4.667.5 ± 8.6**.04Sex.15 Male35.7%57.6% Female64.3%42.4%Follow-up period (mo)21.7 ± 13.424.6 ± 7.9.05Initial tear size category.01** Partial0%39.4% Small7.1%7.6% Medium64.3%33.3% Large/massive28.6%19.7%Initial SSC tear**.03** Intact35.7%60.6% Partial21.4%27.3% Complete42.9%12.1% Initial ISP tear21.4%15.2%.69Initial fatty infiltration SSC**<.001** 0-142.9%87.9% 228.6%9.1% 3-428.6%3.0%Initial fatty infiltration SSP.48 0-114.3%30.3% 278.6%60.6% 37.1%9.1%Initial fatty infiltration ISP.51 0-178.6%86.4% 214.3%10.6% 3-47.1%3.0% CSA (°)37.4 ± 4.734.8 ± 3.8**.04** Pain at follow-up57.1%54.5%.76CSA, critical shoulder angle; ISP, infraspinatus; SSC, subscapularis; SSP, supraspinatus.Bold values indicate statistical significance (P < .05).Table IVMultivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors associated with fatty infiltration progression.OR95% CIP valueAge1.21.0-1.4.05Medium-sized tear3.30.7-15.3.13SSC complete tear1.90.3-12.8.50SSC fatty infiltration ≥ grade 210.41.7-64.1**.01**CSA1.10.9-1.3.41CI, confidence interval; CSA, critical shoulder angle; OR, odds ratio; SSC, subscapularis.Bold values indicate statistical significance (P < .05).
Discussion
This study explored the risk factors for the progression of SSP tear size and fatty infiltration during nonsurgical management. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed medium-sized tears and SSC fatty infiltration as independent predictors of SSP tear progression, whereas SSC fatty infiltration was identified as the only independent predictor of SSP fatty infiltration progression.
Previous studies have identified various factors associated with rotator cuff tear progression. Patient-related factors reported to be associated with tear progression include older age,24 persistent pain at follow-up,29 smoking,36 diabetes,15 and heavy physical work.19 Radiologic factors associated with progression include full-thickness tears,18^,^24^,^36 medium-sized tears,28^,^36 and fatty infiltration or muscle atrophy of the rotator cuff.15^,^19^,^24 Several studies have consistently shown that full-thickness tears are more likely to progress, and medium-sized tears have also frequently been identified as a risk factor. In contrast, small or partial-thickness SSP tears have been reported to show limited progression.7^,^20^,^32 Overall, these findings highlight the heterogeneity of reported risk factors and definitions of tear progression, and a clear consensus has not yet been established.
CSA reflects glenoid inclination and lateral acromial extension and has been associated with rotator cuff pathology.9^,^26 Several studies have explored the relationship between CSA and tear progression, with inconsistent results, including reports showing no significant association.2^,^19 In both the single previous study and the present study, CSA showed a significant association with tear progression in univariate analysis, but this association was not maintained in multivariate analysis.15 Previous studies have indicated that larger rotator cuff tear sizes are associated with greater CSA values.1^,^33 Overall, these findings suggest that partial-thickness and small tears, which are less likely to progress, tend to be associated with smaller CSA values, and that tear type and tear size could have acted as confounding factors.
In the present study, SSC fatty infiltration grade ≥ 2 was identified as an independent risk factor for SSP tear enlargement. A few previous studies have investigated the relationship between SSC fatty infiltration and tear progression, reporting no significant association, probably because SSC complete tears were scarcely included in their cohorts.15^,^19 In contrast, our study included cases with SSC complete tears and thus provides a novel finding. We speculate that this could be related to the “comma sign.” The comma sign is an arthroscopic landmark for identifying and repairing SSC tears. It was first described by Lo and Burkhart23 in 2003 and represents an arc formed by a portion of the superior glenohumeral ligament and coracohumeral ligament complex, serving as a useful marker of the superolateral corner of the torn SSC tendon. In rotator cuff repair, when an SSC tear is continuous with an SSP tear, repairing the SSC first allows the anterior portion of the posterosuperior cuff to be mobilized laterally with reduced tension, thereby facilitating a more secure repair.5^,^12^,^31 This effect is mediated through reduction of the comma tissue, which also contributes to SSP tendon reduction through its connection to the anterior rotator cable. In contrast, in rotator cuff tears that are treated nonsurgically, the opposite mechanism may occur, ie, when the SSC tear advances, the SSP tendon can be retracted medially together with the SSC tendon through the comma tissue. This could explain why SSC fatty infiltration was identified as a risk factor for SSP tear enlargement in our study.
In symptomatic rotator cuff tears that receive nonsurgical treatment, several studies have reported that muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff tend to progress over time.7^,^15^,^19^,^24^,^27 Nevertheless, there are scarce investigations into their specific risk factors. One study reported that massive tears are more likely to exhibit progression of muscle atrophy,25 but no clear predictors of muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration progression have been established. In the present study, we identified SSC fatty infiltration as a risk factor for the progression of SSP fatty infiltration. The mechanism underlying this finding may also be explained by the “comma sign” theory. In SSC tears with advanced fatty infiltration, the continuity of the anterior portion of the SSP is compromised at the comma tissue, which may predispose the SSP to further fatty infiltration. Overall, these findings suggest that patients with progressive SSC fatty infiltration need particularly careful follow-up during nonsurgical management of rotator cuff tears to decide on treatment strategies before the SSP becomes irreparable.
This study has several limitations. First, this retrospective study is subject to selection bias, as patients who proceeded to surgery after persistent symptoms were excluded, resulting in a cohort limited to those continuing nonsurgical management. Second, the details of nonsurgical management varied among patients and were not standardized. Third, detailed patient-related factors such as dominant hand, occupational status, smoking, and diabetes mellitus were not consistently available due to the retrospective nature of this study. Fourth, the intervals between initial and follow-up MRI varied, preventing an accurate determination of the timing of progression. Absolute changes were affected by the follow-up duration, whereas annualized changes were unreliable because tear enlargement is not constant. Consequently, tear size progression was defined using both absolute and annual criteria. Fifth, fatty infiltration was evaluated qualitatively using the modified Goutallier classification, which has limited reproducibility and may have introduced bias.22
Conclusion
In symptomatic rotator cuff tears that are treated nonsurgically, medium-sized tears and SSC fatty infiltration grade ≥ 2 were identified as independent predictors of SSP tear size progression, and SSC fatty infiltration grade ≥ 2 also predicted SSP fatty infiltration progression. Therefore, careful monitoring of SSC fatty infiltration is essential in patients receiving nonsurgical management.
Disclaimers:
Funding: No external funding was received for this study.
Conflicts of interest: The authors, their immediate families, and any research foundations with which they are affiliated have not received any financial payments or other benefits from any commercial entity related to the subject of this article.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Blonna D.Giani A.Bellato E.Mattei L.CalóM.Rossi R.Predominance of the critical shoulder angle in the pathogenesis of degenerative diseases of the shoulder J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2520161328133610.1016/j.jse.2015.11.05926899036 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Chalmers P.N.Salazar D.Steger-May K.Chamberlain A.M.Yamaguchi K.Keener J.D.Does the critical shoulder angle correlate with rotator cuff tear progression?Clin Orthop Relat Res 47520171608161710.1007/s 11999-017-5249-128120293 PMC 5406338 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Cho N.S.Lee B.G.Rhee Y.G.Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using a suture bridge technique: is the repair integrity actually maintained?Am J Sports Med 3920112108211610.1177/036354651039717121350064 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4De Orio J.K.Cofield R.H.Results of a second attempt at surgical repair of a failed initial rotator-cuff repair J Bone Joint Surg Am 6619845635676707035 · pubmed ↗
- 5Dilisio M.F.Neyton L.Comma sign-directed repair of anterosuperior rotator cuff tears Arthrosc Tech 32014 e 695e 69810.1016/j.eats.2014.09.00125685676 PMC 4314558 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Dunn W.R.Schackman B.R.Walsh C.Lyman S.Jones E.C.Warren R.F.Variation in orthopaedic surgeons' perceptions about the indications for rotator cuff surgery J Bone Joint Surg Am 8720051978198410.2106/jbjs.D.0294416140812 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Fucentese S.F.von Roll A.L.Pfirrmann C.W.Gerber C.Jost B.Evolution of nonoperatively treated symptomatic isolated full-thickness supraspinatus tears J Bone Joint Surg Am 94201280180810.2106/jbjs.I.0128622552669 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Fuchs B.Weishaupt D.Zanetti M.Hodler J.Gerber C.Fatty degeneration of the muscles of the rotator cuff: assessment by computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging J Shoulder Elbow Surg 819995996051063389610.1016/s 1058-2746(99)90097-6 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
