# LINA’s testing infrastructure enables AI to take-off in unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs)

**Authors:** Hella A. Bolck, Janik Vollenweider, Fabian Merkli, Alexander Barden, Martin Jajcay, Peter Trempeck, Boško Rafailović, Robert Fraefel, Peter M. Lenhart, Ricardo Chavarriaga, Manuel Renold, Jasmina Bogojeska, Thilo Stadelmann, Michel Guillaume

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2026.1764248 · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · 2026-03-13

## TL;DR

This paper discusses how AI can be safely integrated into drones using testing infrastructure like LINA, which supports development and regulatory acceptance.

## Contribution

The paper introduces LINA, a testing infrastructure for UAVs that enables systematic validation and regulatory learning for AI-enabled autonomous systems.

## Key findings

- Traditional risk assessment methods are inadequate for adaptive AI systems in UAVs.
- LINA provides a platform for validating autonomous functions under realistic conditions.
- Testing infrastructure is critical for building trust and enabling safe AI deployment in aviation.

## Abstract

The development of autonomous aerial robots capable of safely navigating complex real-world environments without or with little human intervention represents a major milestone in robotics and artificial intelligence (AI). While rapid advances in AI-enabled decision-making, sensing, and control systems are unlocking new capabilities for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), their translation into safe and scalable real-life applications remains a major challenge. In this Perspective, we examine key AI technologies relevant to aerial autonomy and discuss early application scenarios in unmanned aviation and airspace management, with a focus on their assurance-relevant properties. We analyze regulatory obstacles that limit deployment, particularly for AI-enabled and beyond visual line of sight (BVLOS) operations, and highlight why traditional risk assessment and certification approaches are need to be updated to account for adaptive, data-driven systems. Building on this analysis, we argue that testing infrastructure must be understood as a core scientific instrument, enabling systematic evidence generation under realistic and safety-critical conditions, validating autonomous functions, ensuring safety, and building trust among regulators and the public. As a concrete example, we introduce LINA, a scientifically-grounded, integrated experimentation and validation platform in Switzerland designed to support iterative, regulator-aware development of autonomous systems across technology readiness levels. We highlight how LINA function as sandbox for system-level science, regulatory learning, and trust building, thereby enabling the responsible and societally acceptable integration of autonomous aerial systems and strengthening Switzerland’s role in advancing aerial robotics research and innovation.

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13022511/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13022511/full.md

## References

78 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13022511/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13022511