# The Healing Effect of Photobiomodulation on Venous Leg Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

**Authors:** Aqella Rasul, Frederik Plum, Katrine Elisabeth Karmisholt, Klaus Kirketerp‐Møller

PMC · DOI: 10.1111/wrr.70144 · Wound Repair and Regeneration · 2026-03-26

## TL;DR

This study reviews whether photobiomodulation helps heal venous leg ulcers but finds no significant benefit compared to standard care.

## Contribution

A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating photobiomodulation's efficacy for venous leg ulcers, highlighting lack of significant benefit.

## Key findings

- Photobiomodulation did not significantly reduce ulcer area compared to controls.
- High heterogeneity and methodological limitations reduced confidence in results.
- Well-designed RCTs are needed to clarify photobiomodulation's therapeutic potential.

## Abstract

Venous leg ulcers are common, costly and often slow to heal despite standard management. Photobiomodulation has been proposed as an adjuvant therapy to enhance wound repair. This systematic review and meta‐analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of photobiomodulation on healing outcomes in venous leg ulcers. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library (1990–2024) identified randomised controlled trials evaluating photobiomodulation in adults with venous leg ulcers. Two reviewers independently screened studies (n = 3824) and assessed eligibility according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria (n = 34). Data were extracted from the included studies (n = 11), and the risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. A random‐effects meta‐analysis was conducted for the absolute change in ulcer area. Eleven trials were included, comprising 615 randomised patients, where 340 had venous leg ulcers. Patients who completed follow‐up contributed to the healing outcomes (intervention n = 169, controls n = 167). All studies were evaluated to have some or high concerns for risk of bias. Four trials contributed data to the meta‐analysis showing that photobiomodulation did not significantly reduce ulcer area compared with controls (Mean Difference 3.77 cm2, 95% CI −4.45 to 11.99; p = 0.37) and heterogeneity was substantial (τ
2 = 65.37; I
2 = 96%). Current evidence does not demonstrate a statistically significant benefit of photobiomodulation on venous leg ulcer healing. High heterogeneity, small sample sizes and methodological limitations reduce confidence in the pooled estimate. Standards for photobiomodulation therapy in venous leg ulcers are still missing, and well‐designed RCTs are needed to clarify the therapeutic potential of photobiomodulation.

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** VEGFA (vascular endothelial growth factor A) [NCBI Gene 7422] {aka L-VEGF, MVCD1, VEGF, VPF}, TGFB1 (transforming growth factor beta 1) [NCBI Gene 7040] {aka CAEND1, CED, DPD1, IBDIMDE, LAP, TGF-beta1}, CYCS (cytochrome c, somatic) [NCBI Gene 54205] {aka CYC, HCS, THC4}
- **Diseases:** inflammation (MESH:D007249), foot and leg ulcers (MESH:D016523), pigmentation (MESH:D010859), vein valve incompetence (MESH:D001022), calcification (MESH:D002114), Venous Leg Ulcers (MESH:D014647), pain (MESH:D010146), leg ulcers (MESH:D007871), obesity (MESH:D009765), fibrosis (MESH:D005355), leg (MESH:D010264), diabetic and pressure ulcers (MESH:D003668), venous disease (MESH:D004194), blistering (MESH:D001768), oedema (MESH:C536897), Ulcer (MESH:D014456), erythema (MESH:D004890), diabetic foot ulcers (MESH:D017719), hyperpigmentation (MESH:D017495)
- **Chemicals:** silver sulphadiazine (MESH:D012837), gentamicin (MESH:D005839), sulodexide (MESH:C007858), ATP (MESH:D000255), flavonoid (MESH:D005419), potassium permanganate (MESH:D011196), chloramphenicol (MESH:D002701), acetylsalicylic acid (MESH:D001241), GaAs (MESH:C043055), pentoxifylline (MESH:D010431), octenisept (MESH:C000718682), nitric oxide (MESH:D009569), GaAlAs (-), ROS (MESH:D017382)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13022061/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13022061/full.md

## References

46 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13022061/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13022061