# Gender differences in diabetes knowledge, glycemic control, and cardiovascular risk among adults with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study

**Authors:** Osama Albasheer, Mohamed Salih Mahfouz, Ayyub Alssum, Mohammed Majrashi, Areej Hamdi, Wedad M. Alhazmi, Bayan Hassan Hakami, Aisha A. Awaf, Rania Hassan, Norah Rajeh, Taif Solan, Tahani Madkhali, Hatim Alessa, Afnan Madkhali, Afaf Hakami

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2026.1763252 · Frontiers in Endocrinology · 2026-03-13

## TL;DR

This study found that women with type 2 diabetes in Saudi Arabia have better diabetes knowledge than men, but both genders struggle with glycemic control and cardiovascular risk.

## Contribution

The study identifies gender-specific factors influencing diabetes knowledge and cardiovascular risk in Saudi adults with type 2 diabetes.

## Key findings

- Women had significantly higher diabetes knowledge than men.
- Physical inactivity and smoking were more prevalent in men, contributing to higher cardiovascular risk.
- Glycemic control was suboptimal in both genders, with over 47% having HbA1c >8%.

## Abstract

Gender differences in diabetes knowledge, glycemic control, and cardiovascular risk remain an important public health concern. This study examined gender differences in diabetes knowledge, glycemic control, and cardiovascular risk among adults with type 2 diabetes in Saudi Arabia, with sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyle behaviors, healthcare utilization, and perceptions of recent social reforms explored as contextual factors.

A cross-sectional study was conducted among 336 adults with type 2 diabetes attending primary healthcare centers. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire assessing diabetes knowledge, healthcare utilization, lifestyle behaviors, and perceptions of social reforms. Clinical data included HbA1c and Framingham Risk Score (FRS) variables. Logistic regression models were developed separately for males and females.

Women demonstrated higher diabetes knowledge than men (59.5% vs. 44.6%, p = 0.016). Among men, university education or higher was associated with substantially greater odds of appropriate knowledge compared with illiteracy (adjusted OR = 7.81, 95% CI: 1.99–30.72; p = 0.003), while among women the association remained significant but of smaller magnitude (adjusted OR = 3.93, 95% CI: 1.52–10.14; p = 0.005). Younger age was independently associated with better knowledge in both genders; participants aged 18–40 years had markedly higher odds compared with those aged >60 years (men: OR = 12.67, 95% CI: 2.67–60.05; p = 0.001; women: OR = 11.43, 95% CI: 3.79–34.51; p < 0.001). Most participants had suboptimal glycemic control, with 47.9% showing HbA1c >8% and only 19.9% achieving HbA1c <7% (p=0.889). Physical inactivity was highly prevalent, with 55.7% never engaging in exercise, and significant gender differences were observed in exercise frequency (p<0.001). Smoking was markedly higher among males (p<0.001) and contributed to higher FRS categories in men.

Although most participants reported easy access to healthcare services, gender differences in diabetes knowledge and cardiovascular risk remained evident, while glycemic control was suboptimal across both genders. These findings underscore the need for gender-sensitive diabetes education, targeted physical activity interventions, and routine cardiovascular risk assessment as integral components of diabetes care.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** type 2 diabetes (MONDO:0005148)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** type 2 diabetes (MESH:D003924), diabetes (MESH:D003920)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13021489/full.md

## References

53 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13021489/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13021489