Adaptability factors and behavioral biases of investors in frontier markets: An adaptive market hypothesis perspective

TL;DR

This study explores how investor adaptability influences behavioral biases in Bangladesh's stock market using the Adaptive Market Hypothesis.

Contribution

The study introduces a novel market adaptability model with 'adaptability factors' grounded in AMH and bounded rationality.

Findings

External adaptability factors like social influence and media increase herding bias.

Internal factors like trading experience and self-reflection boost overconfidence.

Financial literacy reduces both herding and overconfidence biases.

Abstract

The Adaptive Market Hypothesis (AMH) suggests that investors are imperfect but adaptive, allowing behavioral biases to persist and evolve over time. However, empirical research on how adaptability factors influence these biases in stock investment remains limited, especially in frontier markets. This study examines the impact of adaptability factors on herding (HRD) and overconfidence (OVR) biases among individual investors in Bangladesh, a frontier market. Employing purposive sampling, data were collected through structured face-to-face and online questionnaire surveys from 640 retail investors on the Dhaka Stock Exchange (DSE). Data were managed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) and analyzed using SmartPLS 4.0 for Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The results show that all the external adaptability factors (social influence, consultation with financial advisors, and media) positively influence herding, while the internal adaptability factors (trading experience, self-reflection, and desire for learning) positively influence overconfidence. Financial literacy negatively affects both biases. The study offers insights for policymakers, regulators, and investors on the cognitive and social elements driving biased investment decisions, especially in frontier markets. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study pioneers a market adaptability model incorporating novel variables, labelled ‘adaptability factors’, grounded in AMH and bounded rationality.

Figures

Market adaptability model of individual investors.

Market adaptability model relating adaptability factors and behavioral biases.

Full text

Introduction

Traditional finance theories assume that markets are efficient and that investors act rationally, maximizing utility through informed decisions [1,2]. Recent studies align with this, suggesting that investors make rational investment choices based on risk-return trade-offs [3]. In contrast, behavioral finance proposes that instead of pure rationality, investment decisions are shaped by psychological factors, especially in risky situations [4–6].

The Adaptive Market Hypothesis (AMH) [7–9] offers a more nuanced view of market efficiency stating that markets alternate between phases of efficiency and inefficiency over time [10]. Based on bounded rationality [11] and dynamic market efficiency, AMH posits that investors learn from mistakes and adapt for survival in changing conditions [8]. Market dynamics, coupled with both internal and external factors, significantly shape investor adaptability. Although AMH has gained attraction, a comprehensive examination of individual factors influencing behavioral rationality in time-varying efficient markets is lacking [12]. This study addresses this gap by introducing the concept of “adaptability factors”, categorized as internal (cognitive) and external (social) dimensions.

Heuristics-based decisions, or behavioral biases, often lead to investors’ irrationality [7,8,12]. If unaddressed, these biases threaten investors’ survival in dynamic markets and destabilize financial systems. While herding (HRD) and overconfidence (OVR) biases have been widely studied, their connections to investors’ cognitive and social adaptability remain underexplored in frontier markets. These biases have been especially destabilizing markets in the post-COVID-19 era, significantly contributing to volatility and price distortions [13–16]. However, the psychological and social drivers behind these behaviors are still not well understood. Examining these biases through the lens of adaptability factors provides a timely and relevant contribution to behavioral finance, particularly in underrepresented and volatile markets.

Behavioral biases in frontier markets remain underexplored despite their heightened susceptibility to irrational investor behavior due to low liquidity, weak regulation, and high volatility [12,17,18]. Bangladesh, still classified as a frontier market [19], presents a compelling case with around 80% retail participation, as stated by the regulators [20], and frequent episodes of herding and overconfidence [21,22]. Cultural collectivism fosters conformity and trend-following, while low financial literacy amplifies cognitive biases. Market disruptions, such as the 2010 and 2013 crash, illustrate how structural weaknesses and psychological factors drive irrational decisions [12]. Studying Bangladesh’s market through the lens of AMH provides context-specific insights into how adaptability factors influence investor behavior under dynamic and volatile settings.

Based on the preceding discussion, the objectives of this study are: (RO1) to examine the influence of adaptability factors on herd bias of Bangladeshi retail investors; and (RO2) to examine the influence of adaptability factors on overconfidence bias.

This study contributes to behavioral finance in three ways. First, it introduces the concept of ‘adaptability factors’, encompassing both internal and external elements essential for investors in competitive, evolving markets. Second, it empirically examines their impact on behavioral biases (HRD and OVR) in stock market investments, contributing to the under-explored literature on behavioral biases in adaptive financial markets. Third, it provides a contextual contribution by examining market adaptability factors and behavioral biases in Bangladesh – a frontier stock market where retail dominance and structural fragility provide a critical lens on investor adaptability.

The rest of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 reviews literature and develops research hypotheses. Section 3 outlines the methodology. Section 4 presents empirical analysis. Section 5 discusses the findings and Section 6 concludes.

Literature review and hypothesis development

Herd bias

Herding (HRD) refers to the tendency of investors to imitate others’ behavior rather than relying on their own information, especially in uncertain environments [23,24]. This behavior is particularly strong in frontier markets, where informational transparency is limited [17,25]. Herd behavior is evolutionary and may decline over time as investors learn from mistakes [26]. Prior studies indicate that trading experience, financial literacy, and a desire for learning can mitigate herding while promoting rational decision-making [27,28]. Conversely, social indications, such as word-of-mouth communication or peer influence can significantly intensify herding behavior [29]. Given its widespread destabilizing impact on financial systems [30], understanding the drivers of herding is vital for improving market behavior and investor decision-making.

Overconfidence bias

Overconfidence (OVR), a well-known heuristic-driven bias, occurs when individuals overestimate their knowledge, the accuracy of information and their ability to predict outcomes [31,32]. Research identifies several antecedents of overconfidence, including demographics [33], trading experience [34], financial literacy [30], and social factors, such as, information from advisors and peers [35]. Self-attribution also reinforces this bias [36]. Although overconfidence can lead to excessive trading and price volatility [37,38], AMH suggests that investors may eventually adapt their behavior in response to evolving market dynamics [39].

Adaptive market hypothesis and adaptability factors

The Adaptive Market Hypothesis (AMH) extends the Efficient Market Hypothesis, reconciling efficient market principles with behavioral biases. It suggests that market efficiency and inefficiency can coexist with intelligent, forward-looking, competitive, and imperfect investors continuously learning from their mistakes and adapting to changing economic conditions [7–9]. In a time-varying efficient market, where market efficiency fluctuates, behavioral anomalies persist but evolve over time [12]. Failure to adapt can result in financial losses and market exit, emphasizing that adaptability is crucial for survival in a competitive market. AMH suggests that retail investors’ behavior, shaped by their adaptation, is determined by both internal and external factors. This study introduces the concept of ‘adaptability factors,’ encompassing cognitive (internal) and social (external) factors, which represent the mechanisms through which AMH operate at the individual level. Internal adaptability factors include trading experience (EXP), self-reflection (RFL), desire for learning (DL), and financial literacy (FL), while external factors comprise social influence (SCL), consultation with financial advisors (ADV), and media exposure (MED). The adaptability factors proposed in this study are conceptually embedded within the Adaptive Market Hypothesis and bounded rationality framework. AMH emphasizes that investors adapt through learning, feedback, and interaction within competitive and uncertain environments. Internal factors such as trading experience, self-reflection, desire for learning, and financial literacy represent cognitive mechanisms through which investors process feedback and adjust behavior over time. External factors including social influence, consultation with financial advisors, and media exposure reflect environmental information channels that shape adaptive responses under conditions of uncertainty and information asymmetry. Thus, the adaptability factors operationalize AMH at the individual investor level without departing from its evolutionary learning perspective.

Although adaptability is often assumed to support rational adjustments, evidence shows that the same factors may heighten susceptibility to biases. Trading experience and a strong learning desire may fuel overconfidence [40–42], while social influence amplifies HRD [29,43]. Thus, adaptability interacts with cognitive and environmental constraints in line with Bounded Rationality [11]. By modeling adaptability factors as antecedents of HRD and OVR, this study extends AMH beyond its general conceptual framing and provides an empirically testable pathway linking adaptation to specific biases in frontier markets.

Trading experience.

Trading experience, typically measured in number of trading years in the stock market, allows investors to accumulate knowledge rapidly [35,44]. Under AMH, experience, gained through reinforcement and reflection, should reduce biases as investors adapt to competitive market conditions [7,8,45]. However, empirical findings are mixed; experience has been found to reduce HRD [26], but also to increase OVR through frequent trading and perceived expertise [37,46,47]. These mixed results justify testing the following hypotheses:

** H1A-B. Trading experience (a) negatively influences herd bias, but (b) positively influences overconfidence bias. **

Self-reflection.

Reflection transforms knowledge into learning by integrating emotional and cognitive processes [48]. High self-reflection allows investors to reevaluate and adjust beliefs based on market information, potentially reducing HRD [26,49]. However, excessive confidence in one’s reflective judgments may foster OVR and risk preference [50,42]. This leads to the following hypotheses:

** H2A-B. Self-reflection (a) negatively influences herd bias, but (b) positively influences overconfidence bias. **

Desire for learning.

An investor’s learning reflects intrinsic motivation driven by emotional engagements, such as attention, interest, or curiosity [51]. DL can strengthen cognitive processing, leading to improved decision-making and reduced HRD, through awareness of personal limitations [26,52]. However, a strong desire to learn may also elevate OVR if investors overrate their improved reflective capacity [40]. Thus, DL may reduce HRD while simultaneously increasing OVR, leading to the following hypotheses:

** H3A-B. The desire for learning (a) negatively influences herd bias, but (b) positively influences overconfidence bias. **

Financial literacy.

Financial literacy, encompassing both basic numerical skills and advanced knowledge of financial concepts, enables individuals to make more rational investment decisions [53–56]. Higher FL can mitigate HRD [57] and reduce OVR by replacing heuristic-based judgments with informed reasoning. Within the AMH framework, this study examines the impact of FL on investors’ behavioral biases, leading to the following hypotheses:

** H4A-B. Financial literacy negatively influences (a) herd bias and (b) overconfidence bias. **

External adaptability factors and behavioral biases

Social influence.

Social influence, including word-of-mouth communication with family, friends, and peer networks, plays a critical role in shaping investment behavior [58,59]. Although such interactions can provide valuable insights, they may also disseminate unreliable or biased information, thereby increasing HRD [29] and occasionally OVR [35]. Accordingly, the following hypotheses are proposed:

** H5A-B. Social influence positively influences (a) herd bias and (b) overconfidence bias. **

Consultation with financial advisors.

Financial advisors offer expertise and reduce information search costs, thereby facilitating rational investment [60,61]. Investors often rely on their advice when managing portfolios and making strategic decisions [35,62]. However, advisors’ prioritization of earning brokerage fees may prompt excessive trading and OVR [63]. Thus, ADV may reinforce both HRD and OVR. This leads to the following hypotheses:

** H6A-B. Consultation with financial advisors positively influences (a) herd bias and (b) overconfidence bias. **

Media.

Media platforms, including newspapers, television, social media, blogs, and financial articles, are vital sources of information, shaping investment behavior [64,65]. While media can help investors make informed decisions and adapt more efficiently [8,66], excessive media exposure to sensational coverage can amplify HRD and OVR, impacting market returns and volatility [67,68]. Thus, the hypotheses are:

** A-B. Information from media positively influences (a) herd bias and (b) overconfidence bias. **

Theoretical framework

This study proposes a Market Adaptability Model (Fig 1) to examine how internal and external adaptability factors influence investors’ behavioral biases, particularly HRD and OVR*.* Behavioral biases, HRD and OVR, serve as dependent variables, while internal (EXP, RFL, DL, FL) and external (SCL, ADV, MED) adaptability factors act as independent variables. Grounded in the Adaptive Market Hypothesis (AMH) and Bounded Rationality, the framework suggests that adaptability processes help investors survive in dynamic markets. However, these processes can also influence psychological biases when shaped by cognitive and social factors.

Market adaptability model of individual investors.

Materials and methods

Research design, data collection, and sampling

This study employed an empirical, quantitative research design based on behavioral finance theories. The target population consisted of individual investors trading on the frontier market of the Dhaka Stock Exchange (DSE). The survey was administered using a dual-mode approach, both online and through face-to-face distribution of hardcopy questionnaires. No qualitative interviews were conducted; the term “face-to-face” refers exclusively to the in-person administration of the structured questionnaire. The in-person surveys were conducted during trading hours in collaboration with 11 brokerage houses in Dhaka, where researchers visited brokerage house trading floors and requested eligible investors to complete the questionnaire on-site. The online survey was distributed through Google Forms to investors identified via brokerage houses, who were contacted and invited to participate after receiving study information. Participation was voluntary, with no incentives provided. A screening question confirmed eligibility by verifying a minimum of two years of trading experience. All data analyzed in this research were obtained solely from structured survey responses.

Respondents were selected using non-probability sampling, particularly purposive (judgmental) sampling to ensure representation of active investors. A probability-based sampling frame was not available, as no comprehensive contact list of active investors exists, and probability-based approaches are often impractical in social science research. Access to participants further required collaboration with brokerage houses. Purposive sampling ensured that all respondents met strict eligibility criteria: being at least 18 years old and having two or more years of trading experience, consistent with prior behavioral finance studies [29,69]. To mitigate potential bias, the gender distribution of the sample was aligned with Central Depository Bangladesh Limited (CDBL) records, reflecting a male-to-female ratio of approximately 75:25.

Sample size estimation followed established approaches. In particular, the “10-times rule” [70], based on the maximum number of arrows pointing to a construct in the model (nine), yielded a minimum sample size of 90. Using G*Power [71], with desired statistical power (1–β = 0.80), significance level (α = 0.05), medium effect size (f^2^ = 0.15), and number of predictors = 9, the minimum required sample size was 114. The final dataset of 640 valid responses exceeded both thresholds, strengthening the reliability of results. Data were collected cross-sectionally over a four-month period (15 November 2022–15 February 2023).

Scale development and validation of questionnaire

Adaptability factors were conceptualized as internal (trading experience, self-reflection, desire for learning, and financial literacy) and external (social influence, consultation with financial advisors, and media) constructs, consistent with the AMH. Unlike prior behavioral finance research that mostly examined isolated biases, this study considers adaptability factors as antecedents shaping herding (HRD) and overconfidence (OVR). In doing so, the study extends AMH beyond its qualitative framing and aligns it with the theory of Bounded Rationality. The structured questionnaire comprised items measuring seven independent variables, two dependent variables, and seven demographic variables. Independent variables were measured as follows: EXP by years of trading [35]; RFL using the 7-item reflective thinking scale [51]; DL using the 8-item Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale [72]; FL using five items [53,73]; SCL with six items [29]; ADV with five items [26]; and MED with a four-item scale derived from various literature [27,29,39]. Dependent variables were HRD, measured with four items [33] and OVR assessed with six items [27]. Demographic variables comprised gender, marital status, age, education level, occupation, monthly income, and region. The marker variable, “attitude toward the color blue (BLU),” a four-item scale, was used to assess common method bias [74]. Most constructs used 5-point Likert scales, except FL (multiple-choice) and EXP (single-item).

Validity and reliability of the survey instrument were established through a two-stage pre-test. First, expert validation was conducted by five experts, and the Content Validity Index (CVI) confirmed both item- and scale-level validity. Next, the pilot survey, conducted with 100 participants, confirmed satisfactory reliability and validity. All constructs exceeded the 0.7 threshold for Cronbach’s alpha (α) and Composite Reliability (CR), and factor loadings were above 0.50 for all items, confirming internal consistency, reliability, and convergent validity [70,75]. Respondents from the pilot test were excluded from the final survey.

Ethical considerations

Ethical approval was obtained from the Universiti Malaya Research Ethics Committee (UMREC) (Ref: UM.TNC 2/UMREC, 20 January 2022). All participants provided written informed consent prior to participation. They were given detailed information regarding the study objectives, procedures, voluntary participation, and data confidentiality. Consent to publish their data was assumed upon completion of the questionnaire. As the study involved individual investors rather than a formal community or institution, consent from a community representative was not required. The study complies with all relevant ethical regulations, and there were no deviations from the approved study protocol after obtaining ethical clearance from UMREC.

Data analysis techniques

Data were entered, cleaned, and screened using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 26.0 [76], retaining all 640 responses. Descriptive statistics and checks of multiple regression assumptions indicated that the data were non-normally distributed. Consequently, Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was employed in SmartPLS 4.0 [77] to assess relationships among constructs and evaluate the model’s predictive accuracy. PLS-SEM was appropriate given the non-normal data, model complexity, and sample size. The analysis followed a four-step process: (i) testing for normality, (ii) assessing common method variance (CMV), (iii) validating the measurement model, and (iv) evaluating the structural model [70,78].

Structural Model Evaluation and Statistical Assumptions

Prior to estimating the structural model, key statistical assumptions were assessed to ensure the robustness and validity of the PLS-SEM results. Multivariate normality was tested using Mardia’s skewness and kurtosis, which confirmed non-normality and further justified the use of PLS-SEM. Multicollinearity was evaluated through variance inflation factors (VIF), indicating no collinearity concerns. Linearity and homoscedasticity were verified by residual scatterplots, while Durbin-Watson statistics confirmed the independence of errors. Sample size adequacy was ensured with the final sample of 640 far exceeding minimum requirements. Structural model evaluation was then conducted using non-parametric bootstrapping with 10,000 resamples to generate stable standard errors and 95% bias-corrected confidence intervals. For model evaluation, both explanatory power and predictive adequacy were assessed, where R^2^ values indicated moderate explanatory power, and Q^2^ statistics confirmed moderate predictive relevance of the endogenous constructs. Model fit was evaluated using standardized root mean square residual (SRMR < 0.08), supplemented by additional PLS-specific diagnostics (d_ULS and d_G) used for comparative purposes. These diagnostics supported the robustness, reliability, and theoretical adequacy of the model despite reliance on non-probability sampling and non-normal data distributions. Extended robustness checks are reported in the Results section and in Supporting Information (S3 Text, S4 Table).

Results

Sample characteristics

Socio-demographic characteristics of the individual investors, presented as a frequency distribution, are summarized in Table 1. Among the respondents, 75% were male, reflecting the male-to-female investor ratio (75:25) in the DSE. Most respondents were aged between 25–44 years, and over half held a master’s degree. The majority were employed in the private sector and resided in the Dhaka division, including the capital.

Table 1: Socio-demographic profile of the investors.

Normality testing

A normality test was conducted using Mardia’s multivariate skewness and kurtosis test via Webpower software. The data were not multivariate normal, as both skewness and kurtosis exceeded recommended cut-off values [79]. This justified the use of PLS-SEM, which is robust to non-normal data distributions.

Common method variance

This study was susceptible to common method variance, given the reliance on a single source of respondents (individual investors) and a single data collection method (questionnaire survey). To address potential CMV, both procedural and statistical remedies were applied. Procedurally, item wording was varied and respondent anonymity was assured to minimize evaluation apprehension. Statistically, “attitude towards color blue” (BLU) was used as a marker variable [74]. The Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) Marker Technique showed no significant changes in R^2^ and β values between the method factor model and the baseline models, suggesting the absence of CMV. Additionally, Harman’s Single-Factor Test indicated that percentage variance explained by a single factor was less than 50%, further confirming that CMV was not a concern.

Measurement model assessment

Convergent validity, which assesses the validity of individual items, was evaluated using item loadings, Cronbach’s Alpha, Composite Reliability, and Average Variance Extracted (AVE). Items with loadings below 0.50 were removed prior to final estimation. The measurement model results for convergent and discriminant validity are presented in Table 2. All retained item loadings exceeded 0.50, with most above the preferred threshold of 0.708, except for HRD2. Cronbach’s Alpha values were above 0.70 for all constructs (except HRD), while CR values consistently exceeded 0.70. AVE scores for all constructs were greater than 0.50, thus, confirming internal consistency, reliability, and convergent validity.

Table 2: Measurement model results for convergent validity and discriminant validity.

Discriminant validity, reflecting the degree to which items are divergent among constructs, was assessed using the Heterotrait-Monotrait (HTMT) ratio [80]. As reported in Table 2, all HTMT values were below the 0.85 threshold, which indicates strong discriminant validity and confirms that respondents clearly distinguished among the constructs. Fig 2 illustrates the final market adaptability model linking adaptability factors and behavioral biases.

Market adaptability model relating adaptability factors and behavioral biases.

Collinearity Statistics, measured using the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) in the inner model, indicate collinearity between independent variables and each endogenous variable. VIF values for the endogenous variables (HRD and OVR) were below 5.0, indicating no multicollinearity among the independent variables [79].

Structural model testing

The structural model assessed how internal and external adaptability factors influence HRD and OVR. To evaluate the hypothesized relationships, a 10,000-sample re-sample bootstrapping method was applied with a 0.05 significance level using one-tailed testing (critical value = 1.645) to address the non-normality of data [81]. Both p-values and 95% bias-corrected confidence intervals (CI) were reported to ensure robust statistical decisions. The hypotheses test results, representing the direct effects of adaptability factors on herding and overconfidence, are presented in Table 3.

Table 3: Hypothesis testing of adaptability factors predicting herding and overconfidence biases.

The results reveal significant relationships between adaptability factors and behavioral biases in stock market investments. All external adaptability factors, SCL, ADV, and MED, positively influenced herding (β = 0.309, p < 0.001; β = 0.089, p < 0.05; β = 0.194, p < 0.001 respectively). Internal adaptability factors, EXP, RFL, and DL, had significant positive effects on overconfidence (β = 0.261, p < 0.001; β = 0.113, p = 0.024; and β = 0.258, p < 0.001 respectively). By contrast, FL had a significant negative effect on both herding (β = −0.141, p < 0.001) and overconfidence (β = −0.067, p < 0.05). All supported hypotheses had confidence intervals excluding zero at the 5% significance level, confirming their statistical significance. The output patterns suggest that adaptability factors operate through distinct pathways: social influences primarily promote imitation (herding), whereas cognitive processes enhance self-assessment while also increasing overconfidence.

Predictive relevance

The predictive accuracy of the model was assessed through the coefficient of determination score (R^2^). Both herding and overconfidence demonstrated moderate accuracy with R^2^ values of 0.225 and 0.189 respectively [70], indicating that the adaptability factors explain meaningful variation in these biases.

Robustness and model diagnostics

To ensure the robustness of the structural model, multiple diagnostic checks were conducted within the PLS-SEM framework (Table 4). Non-parametric bootstrapping with 10,000 subsamples confirmed the stability of all significant paths, with 95% bias-corrected confidence intervals excluding zero, thereby ensuring the reliability of parameter estimates. Model fit was acceptable (SRMR = 0.072 for the saturated model; 0.073 for the estimated model), with moderate explanatory power (R^2^ = 0.225 for herding; 0.189 for overconfidence) and predictive relevance (Q^2^ > 0 for both endogenous constructs). Collinearity checks confirmed that all VIF values were below 5, ruling out multicollinearity. Linearity and homoscedasticity were supported by residual scatterplots, and Durbin-Watson statistics indicated independence of errors. Additional PLS-SEM fit diagnostics, including d_ULS (2.946; 3.007) and d_G (0.606; 0.608), further supported the adequacy of the model. Extended diagnostics are provided in S3 Text and S4 Table. Collectively, these diagnostics indicate that the model was robust, statistically reliable, and theoretically meaningful, even under purposive (non-probability) sampling and non-normal data distributions.

Table 4: PLS-SEM model fit and predictive diagnostics.

Discussion

This study examined how adaptability factors shape behavioral biases among individual investors in the frontier stock market of Bangladesh. The results reveal a dual pathway of bias formation: external adaptability factors such as social influence, consultation with financial advisors, and media strongly drive herding, while internal factors including trading experience, self-reflection, and desire for learning primarily fuel overconfidence. Financial literacy, an internal factor, notably reduces both herding and overconfidence, underscoring its role in fostering more rational decision-making. These findings directly address the study’s research questions by confirming that external adaptability factors predominantly influence herding (RO1), while internal adaptability factors shape overconfidence (RO2), with financial literacy mitigating both biases and thereby extending the application of AMH to frontier markets.

Interpreted through the Adaptive Market Hypothesis (AMH), these findings show that investors adapt heuristically to survive under uncertain market conditions [8,12]. When informational frictions are high, external cues dominate, leading investors to imitate others as a short-run survival strategy. This aligns with prior empirical evidence documenting a positive relationship between social influence and herding behavior across frontier markets [21,25,26,82–85]. In the specific context of Bangladesh, Khan and Tan (2020) [83] demonstrate that strong family and social ties significantly intensify herd behavior among retail investors, reinforcing the context-sensitive nature of adaptive imitation. Similarly, reliance on financial advisors has been shown to amplify collective trading tendencies, thereby intensifying herding dynamics in frontier markets [86]. Moreover, media-driven sentiment intensifies herd reactions in volatile markets by spreading sensationalized or incomplete information, as documented in studies examining information diffusion and investor reactions [43,68,87,88].

Internal learning processes, such as trading experience or self-reflection, enhance adaptive capacity but often result in overconfidence when investors overestimate their competence [40,89,90]. While experiential learning and self-reflection may support investment success [91,92], extensive evidence indicates that the assumption that frequent trading or accumulated experience equates to superior skill has repeatedly been shown to inflate overconfidence [26,93]. Empirical studies consistently report a positive association between trading experience and overconfidence [34]. Similarly, cognitive reflection research shows that increased self-perceived competence may lead to miscalibrated self-assessment and amplify overconfidence [40,52]. In contrast, financial literacy reduces reliance on heuristic shortcuts, lowering susceptibility to both herding and overconfidence. Empirical evidence consistently demonstrates that higher financial literacy lowers herd tendencies and mitigates overconfidence bias [18,20,27].

Regarding nonsignificant hypotheses, internal adaptability factors other than financial literacy were not significantly related to herding, and external factors were not significantly associated with overconfidence. Prior research suggests that experience and learning can produce mixed behavioral effects, either reducing imitation or strengthening reliance on personal judgment [40,94]. Evidence that experienced investors prefer autonomous decision-making over advisory dependence [33,95] further supports the absence of significant associations.

These findings reinforce AMH’s principle that adaptation is context-specific and shaped by feedback loops in volatile environments [8]. In the Bangladeshi context, where regulatory oversight is weak and information asymmetry remains pervasive, adaptability produces mixed outcomes: it aids survival but simultaneously reinforces biases. By empirically testing how adaptability factors interact with herding and overconfidence, this study demonstrates that bounded adaptability, rather than pure rationality, constrains investor decision-making in frontier markets [96,97]. Therefore, the central premise of the Adaptive Market Hypothesis—that markets evolve similarly to biological systems—is especially evident in frontier markets, where investor adaptation supports survival but does not guarantee rational decision-making [7].

Theoretical Implications

This study extends behavioral finance by integrating internal and external adaptability factors into AMH. While AMH emphasizes investor learning and survival in changing environments [8], its application to specific behavioral biases has been limited [98,99]. Findings show that adaptability is not uniformly beneficial: external adaptability supports short-term survival through imitation, while internal adaptability promotes long-term learning but can also lead to overconfidence in some cases, except for financial literacy, which mitigates both biases. This duality refines AMH’s learning–survival framework, signifying that adaptation does not necessarily yield rationality, particularly in frontier markets with limited institutional support [12].

This study importantly integrates the Adaptive Market Hypothesis and Bounded Rationality into a unified explanatory framework. While AMH explains how investors adjust their behavior through learning and environmental feedback, Bounded Rationality clarifies why such adaptive processes remain constrained by limited cognitive capacity and imperfect information. By empirically modeling herd and overconfidence biases as behavioral outcomes of internal and external adaptability factors, this study demonstrates that adaptive learning operates within bounded cognitive limits. Thus, adaptation and bounded rationality jointly shape investor behavior, particularly in frontier markets characterized by uncertainty and information asymmetry.

Building on this integrated framework, Table 5 compares adaptability–bias dynamics across frontier, emerging, and developed markets. In the frontier market of Bangladesh, weak oversight and volatility amplify external herding drivers, while internal learning processes increase overconfidence. Financial literacy reduces both herding and overconfidence, confirming its protective role. These results align with prior studies linking social and media influence to herding [43,100] and trading experience or reflection to overconfidence [41,93]. The mitigating effect of literacy echoes findings from Pakistan [101], and emerging markets such as India and Saudi Arabia [13,15], where it reduces overconfidence. In developed markets, greater institutional transparency reduces herding [102,103], while overconfidence is situational, often surfacing during crises [104]. Overall, these findings address gaps highlighted in the literature (Section 2), particularly the underexplored role of adaptability factors in bias formation under AMH, the dual nature of adaptation, and the contextual distinctiveness of frontier markets.

Table 5: Comparative dynamics of adaptability factors and behavioral biases across frontier, emerging, and developed markets.

Overall, these implications show that AMH remains a valuable lens across market contexts but must be operationalized with attention to institutional quality and investor literacy. Modeling adaptability factors as distinct cognitive and social mechanisms clarifies why the same learning processes that support survival can also reinforce behavioral biases in volatile, low-transparency environments. This contextualized extension of AMH highlights the need for theoretical and empirical work that explicitly examines how institutional and informational conditions shape the overall impact of adaptability on rationality. Collectively, the study addresses gaps highlighted in the literature (Section 2), particularly the underexplored role of adaptability factors in bias formation under AMH, the dual nature of adaptation, and the contextual distinctiveness of frontier markets.

Managerial implications

The findings provide several actionable insights for regulators, market institutions, brokerage firms, and listed companies in Bangladesh’s frontier stock market. First, the Bangladesh Securities and Exchange Commission (BSEC) should strengthen market oversight, transparency, and disclosure practices to reduce reliance on informal cues and rumor-based trading. In collaboration with the Bangladesh Institute of Capital Market (BICM), financial literacy initiatives should explicitly address behavioral biases and incorporate lessons from past market crises (e.g., 1996 and 2010 crashes) to highlight common pitfalls. Second, brokerage firms can establish localized Investor Literacy Corners and organize scenario-based workshops or simulated trading sessions. Regular “Bias Literacy Programs,” offered in Bangla, would enable investors to recognize their own cognitive biases in realistic decision-making contexts. Third, gender-focused initiatives are essential. Tailored literacy and digital programs, delivered through grassroots institutions and designed for female investors, can address psychological barriers, improve confidence, and expand women’s participation in capital markets. Fourth, technology-driven nudges via mobile applications can incorporate behavioral alerts, such as warnings about herd-driven price swings or excessive trading, to help investors avoid impulsive decisions. Finally, listed companies should ensure timely and accurate dissemination of financial information to limit speculation and herd-driven volatility, thereby promoting more stable market behavior.

Taken together, these measures address the dual role of adaptability identified in this study. While external adaptability encourages herding and internal adaptability (excluding financial literacy) fuels overconfidence, targeted regulatory, educational, and technological interventions can alleviate these biases and build a more resilient, inclusive, and investor-friendly frontier market.

Conclusion

Over recent decades, individual investors’ behavioral rationality has been challenged due to reliance on cognitive heuristics. This study investigated the impact of adaptability factors on behavioral biases, within Bangladesh’s frontier stock market. In light of AMH and bounded rationality, it fills a key gap in the literature by empirically testing how adaptability factors shape behavioral biases in a dynamic, yet volatile and low-transparency environment. To the best of the researcher’s knowledge, this is the first empirical study to categorize individual investors’ adaptability into internal and external factors and examine their distinct effects on herding and overconfidence in a frontier market.

Findings reveal that external adaptability factors primarily influence herding and internal factors drive overconfidence. Financial literacy is the only factor that consistently reduces both behavioral biases. These insights suggest that improving adaptability, particularly through structured financial knowledge, can help individual investors minimize biased decision-making. The study highlights the need for targeted financial education and policy measures tailored to frontier market conditions, where behavioral biases are amplified by institutional weaknesses and information asymmetry. Overall, this study contributes to behavioral finance and AMH literature by demonstrating how adaptability factors shape biases in frontier markets, providing both theoretical and practical pathways for building a more resilient financial system.

Limitations

This study has several limitations that should be considered when interpreting the findings. First, obtaining authentic responses from Bangladeshi female investors posed challenges due to cultural and market practices, although careful screening was applied to ensure genuine participants. Second, reliance on self-reported perceptual data may have been influenced by respondent mood or context, introducing potential subjectivity, despite diagnostic checks confirming the nonexistence of major bias. Third, the study focused only on individual investors, excluding institutional participants whose adaptability and behavioral patterns may differ. Fourth, the study employed purposive rather than probability sampling, due to the absence of a comprehensive sampling frame of active retail traders. While this limits generalizability, potential bias was mitigated by aligning the sample’s gender distribution with CDBL statistics and by conducting extensive PLS-SEM diagnostics-including bootstrap resampling, multicollinearity checks, error independence tests, and model fit indices)-which confirmed the stability and validity of the structural relationships. Finally, since the study is cross-sectional, causal relationships between adaptability factors and behavioral biases cannot be definitively established.

Further research

The study offers several recommendations for future research. First, large-scale research with more diverse and representative respondents would enhance validity and generalizability of the findings. Second, future studies should explore the relative strength of individual adaptability factors on herding and overconfidence biases, identifying which elements exert the most significant influence. Third, studies incorporating moderating and mediating variables would provide deeper insights into how market adaptability influences heuristics. Fourth, comparative studies across frontier and emerging markets would clarify the role of cultural and institutional contexts in shaping investor behavior. Finally, longitudinal or experimental designs are recommended to establish stronger causal inferences between adaptability factors, behavioral biases, and irrational investment decisions**.**

Supporting information

S1 DataAnonymized dataset of 640 individual investors’ survey responses.(XLSX)

S1 TableSocio-demographic profile of the investors.(DOCX)

S2 TableMeasurement model results for convergent validity and discriminant validity.(DOCX)

S3 TableHypothesis Testing of Adaptability Factors Predicting Herding and Overconfidence Biases.(DOCX)

S3 TextExtended Robustness and Model Diagnostics.Non-parametric bootstrapping (10,000 resamples) was applied to generate stable standard errors and 95% bias-corrected confidence intervals for all structural paths. Model fit indices included SRMR (saturated = 0.072; estimated = 0.073), d_ULS (2.946; 3.007), and d_G (0.606; 0.608), supporting overall adequacy. The model showed moderate explanatory power (R^2^ = 0.225 for herding; 0.189 for overconfidence) and positive Q^2^ values, indicating predictive relevance. VIF (< 5) confirmed absence of multicollinearity, while residual diagnostics supported linearity and homoscedasticity. Durbin-Watson statistics further indicated no autocorrelation of errors. These extended diagnostics reinforce that the model was robust, well specified, and theoretically meaningful despite reliance on purposive sampling.(DOCX)

S4 TablePLS-SEM model fit and predictive diagnostics.(DOCX)

S5 TableComparative dynamics of adaptability factors and behavioral biases across frontier, emerging, and developed markets.(DOCX)

S1 FigMarket adaptability model of individual investors.(TIF)

S2 FigMarket adaptability model relating adaptability factors and behavioral biases.(TIF)

S1 FileQuestionnaire.Completed PLOS inclusivity in global research questionnaire.(DOCX)