# Interaction between tick and host microbiotas: a four-step waltz

**Authors:** F. Baquer, A. Grillon

PMC · DOI: 10.1186/s13071-026-07308-1 · Parasites & Vectors · 2026-02-18

## TL;DR

This paper explores how the microbiomes of ticks and their hosts interact to influence the spread of tick-borne diseases.

## Contribution

The paper introduces a comprehensive framework linking host and tick microbiomes to pathogen transmission dynamics.

## Key findings

- The host skin microbiota influences immune responses and pathogen establishment at the tick feeding site.
- Tick endosymbionts regulate vector competence through nutrient supply and immune modulation.
- Microbiome interactions create windows of vulnerability for pathogen transmission.

## Abstract

Tick-borne diseases represent a growing public health concern worldwide, yet the microbial factors that govern pathogen transmission remain incompletely understood. Over the past decade, high-throughput metagenomics and functional studies have revealed that two distinct microbial communities—the vertebrate host’s skin microbiota and the tick’s own microbiome—act synergistically as key modulators of pathogen acquisition, persistence within the vector, and successful transmission to the vertebrate host. At the feeding site, the skin microbiota orchestrates local cutaneous immunity, influences inflammatory responses, and can either hinder or inadvertently facilitate dermal establishment of tick-borne pathogens such as Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (s.l.), Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Rickettsia species, Babesia spp., and tick-borne encephalitis virus. Tick feeding itself induces rapid and sometimes long-lasting dysbiosis of the skin microbial community, creating temporal windows of vulnerability for pathogen invasion. Concurrently, within the tick vector, a core set of endosymbiotic bacteria, including Rickettsia buchneri, Midichloria mitochondrii, Coxiella-like, and Francisella-like endosymbionts, engage in complex mutualistic, competitive, and facilitative interactions. These symbionts regulate vector competence through nutrient provisioning (especially B-vitamins), direct competition for niche space, and immune priming or suppression of the tick’s innate immune system. Such interactions ultimately determine the maintenance, abundance, and transmissibility of tick-borne pathogens. By integrating these dual host–vector microbiome perspectives in a comprehensive review, we highlight emerging mechanistic insights into transmission ecology and biologically grounded targets for the prevention and control of tick-borne diseases, including anti-microbiota vaccines and paratransgenic and microbiome-based approaches.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** tick-borne diseases (MONDO:0025294)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** inflammatory (MESH:D007249), Tick-borne diseases (MESH:D017282)
- **Species:** Rickettsia tamurae subsp. buchneri (subspecies) [taxon 1462938], Tick-borne encephalitis virus (no rank) [taxon 11084], Francisella (genus) [taxon 262], Candidatus Midichloria mitochondrii (species) [taxon 234827], Borreliella (Lyme Disease Borrelia, genus) [taxon 64895], Anaplasma phagocytophilum (agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis, species) [taxon 948], Coxiella (genus) [taxon 1260513]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13020190/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13020190/full.md

## References

4 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13020190/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13020190