Tissue-specific matrix-bound nanovesicles regulate the immunoregulatory progress of biological mesh-aided abdominal hernia repair
Beili Zhang, Jiajie Liu, Lei Liu, Jinglei Wu, Xiumei Mo, Rui Tang, Zhengni Liu

TL;DR
The study shows how tissue-specific nanovesicles in biological meshes influence immune responses and tissue repair during hernia treatment.
Contribution
The novel contribution is the discovery of tissue-specific matrix-bound nanovesicles and their distinct immunomodulatory roles in hernia repair.
Findings
SIS MBVs promote angiogenesis via ERK1/2 activation, while UBM MBVs favor anti-inflammatory macrophage polarization through TGF-β1 signaling.
UBM-SIS meshes cause milder early inflammation than SIS meshes but lose effectiveness as SIS interlayer is exposed.
SIS meshes initially trigger inflammation but switch to anti-inflammatory state after 4 weeks, aiding tissue integration over 8 weeks.
Abstract
Consensus on abdominal hernia treatment with biological meshes remains elusive, largely due to variable and dynamic responses that dictate extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling outcomes. Matrix-bound nanovesicles (MBVs) are ECM-embedded bioactive cues that govern cell-mesh crosstalk, whereas their tissue-specific functions in immunomodulatory repair remain poorly understood. Herein, MBVs were isolated from clinically used small intestinal submucosa (SIS) and urinary bladder matrix (UBM)-SIS (UBM-SIS) meshes to investigate their differential immunomodulation during hernia repair. SIS MBVs promoted angiogenesis via ERK1/2 activation, while UBM MBVs favored anti-inflammatory macrophage polarization through transforming growth factor-β1(TGF-β1) signaling pathways, showing synergistic effects in combination. In the repair of a full-thickness rat model, UBM-SIS meshes elicited milder early…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHernia repair and management · Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions · Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
