Methane by the Numbers: The Need for Clear and Comparable Methane Intensity Metrics
Matthew R. Johnson, Bradley M. Conrad, Daniel J. Zimmerle, Robert L. Kleinberg

TL;DR
The paper argues for standardized methane intensity metrics to accurately compare emissions from oil and gas operations.
Contribution
The study identifies three unbiased methane intensity metrics that avoid biases caused by ignoring coproduced oil and liquids.
Findings
Half of the analyzed methane intensity metrics are biased due to exclusive attribution to gas production.
Three metrics are shown to be computationally equivalent when benchmarked against total energy production.
Recommended metrics allow for straightforward calculation of embodied intensities across supply chains.
Abstract
Global efforts to track methane emissions from oil and natural gas operations have recently converged around measures of methane emissions intensity, including emergent requirements for reporting as part of import standards. However, multiple definitions of methane intensity have led to conflicting approaches that hinder clear comparisons among regions and obstruct the development of effective policy. This study analyzes six of the predominant methane intensity metrics and shows how half, by attributing methane exclusively to gas production while overlooking coproduced oil and liquids, can bias comparisons among jurisdictions and have limited practical utility. These simple loss rates are strongly dependent on gas-oil ratios and tend toward meaningless infinite methane intensities in oil-dominant operations. The three remaining metrics overcome this limitation and are recommended as…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics · Global Energy and Sustainability Research · Oil, Gas, and Environmental Issues
