Recurrent, Nonrecurrent, and De Novo Membranous Nephropathy After Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Thanyarat Phumthian, Veerapat Wattanasatja, Aschariya Wipattanakitcharoen, Thunyatorn Wuttiputhanun, Asada Leelahavanichkul, Natavudh Townamchai, Yingyos Avihingsanon, Suwasin Udomkarnjananun

TL;DR
This study reviews and analyzes the recurrence and new onset of membranous nephropathy after kidney transplants, finding that protocol biopsies help detect recurrence and rituximab improves remission rates.
Contribution
The first comprehensive meta-analysis of post-transplant membranous nephropathy, linking protocol biopsies and rituximab to better outcomes.
Findings
Recurrence prevalence is higher with protocol biopsies (39%) than without (25%).
Rituximab increases remission odds by nearly fivefold in recurrent membranous nephropathy.
De novo MN is associated with higher rejection rates compared to recurrent MN.
Abstract
Recurrent and de novo membranous nephropathy (MN) are significant complications after kidney transplantation, yet prevalence, risk determinants, and treatment outcomes have not been comprehensively quantified. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Kidney transplant recipients with native-kidney MN (recurrent or nonrecurrent) and recipients with de novo MN. PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched through June 30, 2025; studies comparing risk factors and outcomes among these groups were eligible for meta-analyses. Study characteristics, demographics, transplant features, outcomes including remission and allograft loss. Random-effects meta-analyses calculated weighted mean differences or pooled ORs for comparisons between recurrent versus nonrecurrent or de novo MN, allograft outcomes, and response to rituximab. The included studies comprised a total of 2,259 kidney…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRenal Diseases and Glomerulopathies · Renal and Vascular Pathologies · Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
