Effectiveness of conventional surface water treatment processes in reducing natural radionuclides in Nile River drinking water
Khaled Ali, Zinab S. Matar, Shaban Harb, Khaled Salah El-Din, Clemens Walther, Mahmoud Kilany, Karem Moubark

TL;DR
This study evaluates how well water treatment processes in Upper Egypt reduce natural radionuclides in Nile River drinking water, showing they effectively lower radiation risks.
Contribution
The study provides stage-specific removal efficiencies of natural radionuclides in conventional water treatment processes in Nile-derived drinking water.
Findings
Conventional treatment processes achieved 74.19% removal of Rn-222, 28.86% for Ra-226, 46.84% for Ra-228, and 20.17% for K-40.
Filtration significantly enhanced Rn-222 removal, while coagulation-filtration was essential for Ra-228.
Annual effective doses were below 100 µSv/year for all age groups, indicating low radiological risk.
Abstract
Understanding the stage-specific performance of conventional water treatment processes in removing natural radionuclides is crucial for optimizing public health protection, particularly in regions dependent on major river systems like the Nile. This study comprehensively evaluates the effectiveness of each treatment stage in conventional water treatment plants across Upper Egypt in reducing natural radionuclides, radon-222 (Rn-222), radium-226 (Ra-226), radium-228 (Ra-228), and potassium-40 (K-40), in Nile River-derived drinking water. We collected 40 water samples from 10 representative Nile-fed treatment plants in Upper Egypt, at 4 key stages: raw water intake, post-coagulation/sedimentation, post-filtration, and final treated water. Rn-222 concentrations were measured using the RAD7 detection system with RAD H2O accessory, while gamma-emitting radionuclides (Ra-226, Ra-228, and K-40)…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRadioactivity and Radon Measurements · Fecal contamination and water quality · Radioactive contamination and transfer
