AI versus human-designed exam questions in undergraduate dental education: A randomized controlled study
Preeti Mankar, Deepti Vijay Mankar, Saara Khiyani, Manish Kumar, Varunraj Jadhav, Saloni P Shah

TL;DR
A study compared AI-generated and human-designed exam questions in dental education and found no performance difference, but students preferred human questions for clarity.
Contribution
This is the first randomized controlled trial comparing AI-generated and human-designed exam questions in undergraduate dental education.
Findings
No significant difference in student performance between AI-generated and human-designed questions.
Students preferred human-designed questions for clarity and familiarity.
Abstract
The comparison of the effectiveness and fairness between AI-generated and human-designed exam questions in the context of undergraduate dental education is relevant. Therefore, it is of interest to examine the use of AI-generated versus human-designed exam questions in undergraduate dental education. A randomized controlled trial involving 289 students was conducted to compare the effectiveness and fairness of both formats. Results showed no significant difference in overall student performance between the two groups. However, students preferred human-designed questions for their clarity and familiarity. Thus, the role of AI-generated exam questions in undergraduate dental education compared to traditional human-designed questions remains a challenge.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAcademic integrity and plagiarism · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Student Assessment and Feedback
