Regret concerning treatment decisions in patients with primary or secondary brain tumors – a cross-sectional exploratory bicentric analysis
Julia Reuter, Tim Werfel, Alexander Rühle, Georg Wurschi, Anja Mehnert-Theuerkauf, Johannes Wach, Klaus Pietschmann, Tomas Kazda, Maximilian Römer, Nils H. Nicolay, Andreas Hinz, Clemens Seidel

TL;DR
This study explores how often patients with brain tumors feel regret about their treatment decisions and finds that low satisfaction with medical care and financial issues are strongly linked to this regret.
Contribution
The study identifies non-treatment-related factors like medical care satisfaction and unemployment as significant contributors to decisional regret in brain tumor patients.
Findings
28% of patients reported strong overall decisional regret.
Low satisfaction with medical care and unemployment were strongly associated with higher decisional regret.
Physical and social functioning were inversely correlated with decisional regret.
Abstract
To determine the extent of decisional regret (DR) and contributing factors after treatment of primary and secondary brain tumors (BT). Patients who received radiotherapy (RT) for a BT between 2010 and 2024 were eligible for this bicentric cross-sectional study. DR was assessed using the 5-item Decision Regret Scale (DRS). Overall and treatment-specific DR was determined. Besides DR, health related quality of life (HRQoL), distress, anxiety, depression, and satisfaction with medical care were determined. Associations between DR and covariates were examined in univariate analyses. Linear regression models were calculated for multivariable analyses. From 310 eligible contacted patients, 162 were included. Ninety-four patients (58%) suffered from malignant glioma, and 68 (42%) had brain metastases (BM). Median age was 58 years, median interval between the last RT fraction and study…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
