Multidisciplinary prospective study of standardized pelvic lymph-node dissection focusing on the dorsal obturator nerve region
Tomokazu Sazuka, Yuji Habu, Keisuke Matsusaka, Tetsuro Maruyama, Takayuki Arai, Hiroaki Sato, Keisuke Ando, Manato Kanesaka, Shinpei Saito, Sangjon Pae, Yusuke Imamura, Hirokazu Usui, Ayumu Matsuoka, Natsuko Nakamura, Rie Okuya, Nozomi Sakai, Eri Katayama, Toru Tochigi

TL;DR
This study evaluated a standardized approach to pelvic lymph-node dissection across multiple surgical specialties, focusing on the dorsal obturator nerve region.
Contribution
The study introduces a multidisciplinary, standardized anatomical framework for pelvic lymph-node dissection.
Findings
Over 90% of surgeons found the anatomical classification clear and feasible.
Dissecting the dorsal obturator nerve region added 15 minutes to operative time without improving lymph-node yield.
No major complications were observed in 96% of patients, and quality of life returned to baseline within a month.
Abstract
Pelvic lymph-node dissection is performed across multiple surgical specialties. However, inconsistent terminology and unclear anatomical boundaries hinder standardization. This study established a multidisciplinary team with a shared anatomical understanding, with the aim to prospectively evaluate standardized pelvic lymph-node dissection, focusing on the dorsal region of the obturator nerve. A prospective observational study was conducted at a single institution from November 2022 to 2025. A team of urology, gastrointestinal surgery, gynecology, and pathology specialists received standardized anatomical training. A total of 106 patients undergoing pelvic lymph-node dissection for pelvic cancers were enrolled. Pelvic regions were predefined into seven areas. Data on surgical outcomes, lymph-node yield, complications, operative time, and quality of life were collected. Central pathology…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEndometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments · Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments · Hernia repair and management
