# Fasting vs Nonfasting, Dose-adjusted Levothyroxine Ingestion in Hypothyroidism: A Randomized Clinical Trial

**Authors:** Jeresa I A Willems, Daan J L van Twist, Floris Helmich, Thijs Sluiter, Marco Medici, Robin P Peeters, Roderick F A Tummers-de Lind van Wijngaarden

PMC · DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgaf686 · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism · 2025-12-23

## TL;DR

This study found that taking levothyroxine with breakfast, along with a 15% dose increase, can maintain thyroid hormone levels as well as taking it on an empty stomach.

## Contribution

The study introduces a patient-centered approach by showing nonfasting levothyroxine intake with a dose adjustment is as effective as fasting intake.

## Key findings

- TSH stability was comparable between fasting and nonfasting groups.
- Patients preferred nonfasting intake and reported better well-being.
- 88.9% of patients chose to continue nonfasting intake after the study.

## Abstract

Levothyroxine (LT4) is recommended for intake in a fasting state to optimize absorption. However, fasting intake is often burdensome and may reduce adherence. In a previous questionnaire study, we observed a strong patient preference for taking LT4 with breakfast. Therefore, we conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate whether nonfasting LT4 intake—accompanied by a 15% dose increase—could maintain TSH stability compared to fasting LT4 intake.

Adults with well-controlled hypothyroidism were randomized to fasting or dose-adjusted, breakfast LT4 intake. TSH, free T4, and total T3 were measured every 6 weeks, followed by LT4 dose adjustment if needed. The primary outcome was TSH stability, defined as 2 consecutive values within the reference range and a maximum ±1 mIU/L change from baseline. Patients were followed until TSH stability was reached, with a maximum of 24 weeks. After the initial study period, patients in the fasting group were invited to cross over to nonfasting intake, with similar follow-up.

Eighty-eight patients (80.7% female, median age 62y [interquartile range: 49-69]) were randomized to fasting (n = 43) or breakfast intake (n = 45). TSH stability was comparable between groups: 74.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 61.0-88.0%] in the fasting vs 73.3% (95%CI: 60.0-87.0%) in the breakfast group (P = not significant). Similar findings were observed in the crossover group. The breakfast group reported greater improvement in self-reported well-being (33.3% vs 16.3%, P = .07) and a stronger preference for nonfasting intake (76.2% vs 44.2%, P < .001). By the end of the study, 88.9% chose to continue nonfasting intake.

LT4 ingestion with breakfast with a 15% dose increase maintained TSH stability and improved patient well-being. Given the strong patient preference, this patient-centered approach may offer a viable alternative to fasting administration.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** levothyroxine (PubChem CID 5819), TSH (PubChem CID 1150)
- **Diseases:** hypothyroidism (MONDO:0005420)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Hypothyroidism (MESH:D007037)
- **Chemicals:** FT4 (-), LT4 (MESH:D013974), T3 (MESH:D014284)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13017094/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13017094/full.md

## References

19 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13017094/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13017094