# Reduced Mortality with Use of Point of Care Cell Suspension Autograft

**Authors:** Muzamil Ahmad, Soman Sen, Kathleen Romanowski, Tina Palmieri, David G Greenhalgh, Jason Heard

PMC · DOI: 10.1093/jbcr/iraf221 · Journal of Burn Care & Research: Official Publication of the American Burn Association · 2025-12-01

## TL;DR

Using cell suspension autograft with skin grafts in burn patients may reduce mortality, though more research is needed.

## Contribution

This study provides evidence that CSA combined with STSG reduces mortality in burn patients.

## Key findings

- CSA-treated patients had a significant reduction in mortality compared to non-CSA-treated patients.
- There was a 78.9% reduction in odds of death for CSA-treated patients.
- Increases in length of stay and procedures were nonsignificant but may reflect increased survivorship.

## Abstract

Cell suspension autograft (CSA) is a non-cultured, autologous cellular suspension used in partial-thickness burns or as an adjunct to widely meshed split-thickness skin grafts (STSGs). While CSA has been shown to improve patient outcomes in burn care, literature is limited in highlighting its impact on mortality when used in combination with STSG. This retrospective, matched, case–control study investigates the clinical efficacy of CSA in adult patients with burn injuries admitted to a regional burn center from 2015 to 2023. Patients treated with CSA and STSG (n = 63, “CSA-treated”) were compared against patients treated with STSG alone (n = 126, “non-CSA-treated”). Non-CSA-treated patients were matched in a 2:1 fashion to CSA-treated patients based on third-degree burned TBSA and age. Outcomes included mortality, length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit LOS (ICU LOS), and number of procedures. Multivariate analyses revealed that CSA-treated patients had a significant reduction in mortality (P = .0445) and a 78.9% reduction in odds of death (OR: 0.211) compared to non-CSA-treated patients. Cell suspension autograft-treated patients displayed nonsignificant increases in LOS (P = .0670), ICU LOS (P = .0851), and number of procedures (P = .9084). Selection and chronology bias may partially account for the improved mortality in the CSA-treated group. The nonsignificant increases in LOS, ICU LOS, and number of procedures may be reflective of increased survivorship. These findings demonstrate that CSA enhances survival in patients with burn injuries when used with STSG, warranting further research to confirm these results.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** death (MESH:D003643), burn (MESH:D002056)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13017086/full.md

## References

15 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13017086/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13017086