# Bedaquiline and linezolid resistance in people with rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis in the Western Cape Province of South Africa

**Authors:** Erick Auma, Yonas Ghebrekristos, Greshan Kisten, Tiana Schwab, Sarishna Singh, Christoffel Opperman, Janre Steyn, Brigitta Derendinger, Nabila Ismail, Rouxjeane Venter, Robin Warren, Grant Theron

PMC · DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-9144949/v1 · 2026-03-18

## TL;DR

In South Africa, about 10% of people with drug-resistant tuberculosis had resistance to bedaquiline, with half of these cases likely due to transmission rather than treatment, while linezolid resistance was rare.

## Contribution

This study provides insights into the prevalence and transmission dynamics of bedaquiline resistance in rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis patients in South Africa.

## Key findings

- 12% of rifampicin-resistant TB patients were fluoroquinolone-resistant, and 12% were bedaquiline-resistant.
- Half of the bedaquiline-resistant cases were in first isolates, suggesting transmission rather than treatment-induced resistance.
- Linezolid resistance was rare (<1%) and no cases developed resistance during treatment.

## Abstract

South Africa was an early implementer of bedaquiline and linezolid for drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB), however, programmatic capacity for drug susceptibility testing (DST) was not initially available.

We analysed people with rifampicin-resistant (RR)-TB (n=3138) programmatically tested with Xpert MTB/XDR and bedaquiline and linezolid phenotypic (p)DST in the same episode for diagnosis or treatment monitoring. Data from respiratory specimens collected 01/01/2023–31/12/2024 across six districts in Western Cape, South Africa, were included.

89% (2799/3138) of people were successfully tested with Xpert MTB/XDR, with 12% (332/2799) fluoroquinolone-resistant. 77% (2423/3138) successfully underwent bedaquiline pDST, with 12% (278/2423) resistant. 84% (232/278) of bedaquiline resistance was in the diagnostic (first) isolate. Of these, 51% (118/232) had no prior DR-TB (45 prior drug-susceptible TB, 73 no prior TB). We did not identify associations with bedaquiline-resistance, other than residence in Cape Town (OR 1.61, 1.19–2.20) and resistance to other drugs (fluoroquinolone resistance the strongest; OR 4.38, 3.20–5.96). In people initially bedaquiline-susceptible with a later isolate tested, 22% (45/201) gained resistance. Bedaquiline-resistance was most frequent in the Overberg region [14% (8, 23) of RR/MDR-TB]. 86% (2411/2799) of people had a successful linezolid pDST, with <1% (2/2411) resistant. All 128 people with repeat linezolid pDST remained susceptible.

About one in ten people with RR/MDR-TB had bedaquiline-resistance, with half due to primary transmission. One in five people with RR/MDR-TB did not have bedaquiline DST done, highlighting care cascade gaps. Despite long treatment and sustained culture positivity, minimal linezolid resistance occurred.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** bedaquiline (PubChem CID 5388906), linezolid (PubChem CID 3929)
- **Diseases:** tuberculosis (MONDO:0018076), drug-resistant tuberculosis (MONDO:0041806), rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MONDO:0100479), MDR-TB (MONDO:0005861)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** TB (MESH:D014376), DR (MESH:D004370), MDR-TB (MESH:D018088)
- **Chemicals:** rifampicin (MESH:D012293), Bedaquiline (MESH:C493870), pDST (-), fluoroquinolone (MESH:D024841), linezolid (MESH:D000069349)

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13015602/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13015602