# Second-line chemotherapy after gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in metastatic pancreatic cancer: comparative outcomes and AI-guided treatment selection

## TL;DR

This study compares second-line chemotherapy options for metastatic pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine+nab-paclitaxel and uses AI to guide treatment decisions.

## Contribution

The study introduces interpretable AI methods to optimize treatment allocation for metastatic pancreatic cancer patients.

## Key findings

- FOLFIRINOX showed the longest progression-free and overall survival among second-line regimens.
- AI-derived treatment policies outperformed uniform strategies with a 2.5 percentage-point net benefit.
- Nal-IRI+5FU/LV was recommended for specific patient subgroups based on tumor location and biomarkers.

## Abstract

International guidelines recommend 5FU/LV, Nal-IRI + 5FU/LV, FOLFIRI, FOLFOX, or (m)FOLFIRINOX as second-line (2L) chemotherapy for patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) after failure of gemcitabine+Nab-paclitaxel (GnP). However, a head-to-head comparison has not been performed.

We conducted an observational cohort study of consecutive mPDAC patients treated with 2L chemotherapy after GnP failure at 41 Italian centers. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Interpretable artificial intelligence methods were applied to optimize treatment allocation. A counterfactual Cox model was trained on baseline characteristics to estimate 12-month PFS under each regimen, and an Optimal Policy Tree (OPT) was derived to generate treatment recommendations, validated in a test set. Net-benefit curves evaluated clinical utility.

Among 704 eligible patients, 56 (8.0%) received 5FU/LV, 153 (21.7%) FOLFIRI, 209 (29.7%) FOLFOX, 209 (29.7%) Nal-IRI + 5FU/LV, and 77 (10.9%) FOLFIRINOX. FOLFIRINOX was associated with the longest PFS and OS. Median PFS was comparable among doublets (3.5 months FOLFOX, 3.6 FOLFIRI, 3.3 Nal-IRI + 5FU/LV), though Nal-IRI + 5FU/LV showed a long-term benefit. The OPT recommended Nal-IRI + 5FU/LV for patients with head/body tumors, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) 0, or CA19.9 < 109 U/mL in those with PS > 0. Net-benefit analysis showed that the OPT consistently outperformed uniform treatment strategies, achieving a 2.5 percentage-point net benefit at a threshold probability of ∼9%.

FOLFIRINOX appears the most effective option for carefully selected, fit patients eligible for 2L chemotherapy after GnP failure. Interpretable artificial intelligence-derived treatment policies may provide superior net clinical benefit compared to uniform approaches and guide individualized therapy, warranting integration with upcoming targeted strategies such as RAS inhibitors.