A cross-cultural comparison of educational video quality on college students’ anxiety and depression: a cross-sectional content analysis of YouTube and Bilibili

TL;DR

This study compares educational videos about anxiety and depression on YouTube and Bilibili, finding YouTube videos to be higher quality but both platforms lack professional input.

Contribution

The study introduces a cross-cultural analysis of educational video quality on mental health for college students using YouTube and Bilibili.

Findings

YouTube videos scored higher in quality than Bilibili videos across multiple metrics.

Bilibili videos had higher user engagement but lower scientific accuracy and safety.

Fewer than 6% of videos on both platforms were created by licensed mental-health professionals.

Abstract

To systematically compare the quality of educational videos about anxiety and depression among university students on YouTube and Bilibili, and to provide evidence-based guidance for cross-cultural digital mental-health education.

Before 20 November 2025, we searched YouTube and Bilibili with English and Chinese keywords and collected the first 100 videos returned by default ranking on each platform. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, the remaining videos were evaluated by a third assessor in a double-blind manner using the Video Information and Quality Index (VIQI), the Global Quality Score(GQS)and the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) scales to assess scientific accuracy, safety and educational value. Platform differences were analyzed with non-parametric tests and correlation analyses.

The final sample comprised 80 YouTube and 77 Bilibili videos. Median views, likes, and comments were markedly higher on Bilibili (p < 0.05). Verified accounts supplied 43.75% of YouTube content but only 28.57% of Bilibili content; licensed mental-health professionals appeared in fewer than 6% of videos on either platform. YouTube favoured television-style or documentary formats, whereas Bilibili relied heavily on single-speaker narratives and animations. YouTube outperformed Bilibili on overall VIQI, GQS, and mDISCERN scores (p < 0.01). On Bilibili, high user engagement correlated moderately to strongly with quality, yet absolute quality scores remained low.

Platform architecture, not popularity, drives content quality. YouTube’s longer, institution-produced videos set the benchmark, whereas Bilibili trades scientific rigor for real-time chat and high engagement. Both sites remain short of licensed professionals. To prevent digital platforms from amplifying student anxiety, we recommend (a) embedding a quality-weighted algorithmic boost and (b) a sustained “verified expert + student co-creation” pipeline that disseminates evidence-based content at scale.

Figures