# Learning, sleep replay and consolidation of contextual fear memories: A neural network model

**Authors:** Lars Werne, Angus Chadwick, Peggy Seriès, Marieke van Vugt, Marieke van Vugt, Daniel Bush

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013251 · PLOS Computational Biology · 2026-03-17

## TL;DR

This paper introduces a neural network model that explains how contextual fear memories are formed, consolidated during sleep, and how they evolve over time.

## Contribution

The model integrates memory replay and synaptic homeostasis to explain how fear memories consolidate and persist.

## Key findings

- The model reproduces experimentally observed phenomena like context-dependent fear renewal.
- It suggests that synaptic homeostasis in the amygdala stabilizes fear associations overnight.
- Disruptions in sleep and synaptic homeostasis may lead to persistent fear states.

## Abstract

Contextual fear conditioning is an experimental framework widely used to investigate how aversive experiences affect the valence an animal associates with an environment. While the initial formation of associative context-fear memories is well studied – dependent on plasticity in hippocampus and amygdala – the neural mechanisms underlying their subsequent consolidation remain less understood. Recent evidence suggests that the recall of contextual fear memories shifts from hippocampal-amygdalar to amygdalo-cortical networks as they age. This transition is thought to rely on sleep. In particular, neural replay during hippocampal sharp-wave ripple events seems crucial, though open questions regarding the involved neural interactions remain. Here, we propose a biologically informed neural network model of context-fear learning. It expands the scope of previous models through the addition of a sleep phase. Hippocampal representations of context, formed during wakefulness, are replayed in conjunction with cortical and amygdalar activity patterns to establish long-term fear memories. In addition, valence-coding synapses within the amygdala are subject to homeostatic plasticity overnight, which stabilizes fear associations and regulates the fear circuitry’s synaptic density. The model reproduces experimentally observed phenomena, including context-dependent fear renewal and time-dependent increases in fear generalisation. Our model integrates mechanisms of fear learning, systems consolidation and synaptic homeostasis to provide a unified account of how contextual fear memories form and evolve over time. Our framework yields testable predictions about how disruptions in synaptic homeostasis may promote a persistent, fear-sensitized state. Accounting for neural mechanisms that reshape fear memories after their formation is a step towards bridging computational models of fear learning and the mechanisms behind trauma and anxiety disorders.

How do we learn to fear certain environments? Why do some fear memories fade while others persist or even grow stronger over time? Scientists have long used laboratory experiments to study how animals associate danger with a particular context. These studies have helped identify brain regions involved in fear learning, including the amygdala, hippocampus, and cortex, and have inspired many computational models of how fear is acquired in the brain. However, most models focus only on what happens when fear is first learned, overlooking how these memories evolve in the following days and nights. In this work, we present a neural network model that captures how fear memories are strengthened or reshaped during sleep. It builds on earlier models by incorporating memory replay and synaptic homeostasis, two brain processes believed to support emotional memory consolidation. Our model identifies neural processes that help make fear memories persistent, suggests that sleep is necessary to maintain adaptive behaviour after threatening experiences, and proposes that sleep disruptions mediate the harmful impact of stress on emotional regulation. By extending amygdala-based models of fear learning to include post-learning processes, we aim to narrow the gap between these models and disorders linked with persistent fear, such as PTSD.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** PTSD (MONDO:0005146)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** PHB2 (prohibitin 2) [NCBI Gene 11331] {aka BAP, BCAP37, Bap37, PNAS-141, REA, hBAP}, ABCB6 (ATP binding cassette subfamily B member 6 (LAN blood group)) [NCBI Gene 10058] {aka ABC, LAN, MTABC3, PRP, umat}, CREB1 (cAMP responsive element binding protein 1) [NCBI Gene 1385] {aka CREB, CREB-1}, CYP27A1 (cytochrome P450 family 27 subfamily A member 1) [NCBI Gene 1593] {aka CP27, CTX, CYP27}, HHIP (hedgehog interacting protein) [NCBI Gene 64399] {aka HIP}
- **Diseases:** depression (MESH:D003866), Trauma (MESH:D014947), SEFL (MESH:D000079225), amygdala hyperactivity (MESH:D006948), anxiety disorders (MESH:D001008), neuropsychiatric disorders (MESH:D001523), sleep (MESH:D012893), sleep disruption (MESH:D019958), Insomnia (MESH:D007319), trauma-related disorders (MESH:D000068099), PTSD (MESH:D013313), Sleep deprivation (MESH:D012892), anxiety (MESH:D001007), CFC (MESH:C000719212)
- **Chemicals:** BAN (-), NE (MESH:D009638), histamine (MESH:D006632), serotonin (MESH:D012701)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Rattus norvegicus (brown rat, species) [taxon 10116]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13012624/full.md

## Figures

9 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13012624/full.md

## References

158 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13012624/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13012624