# Pre-pyloric enteral nutrition versus total parenteral nutrition on survival in dogs with acute pancreatitis

**Authors:** Felix Tsz Fung Ting+

PMC · DOI: 10.18849/ve.v10i4.730 · 2025-12-11

## TL;DR

This paper investigates whether feeding dogs with acute pancreatitis through the stomach (enteral) improves survival compared to feeding through the vein (parenteral).

## Contribution

The study provides a critical review of a single open-label pilot trial comparing two nutrition methods in dogs with acute pancreatitis.

## Key findings

- There was no significant difference in survival rates between pre-pyloric enteral and total parenteral nutrition.
- The evidence supporting one nutrition method over the other is currently weak.

## Abstract

In dogs with acute pancreatitis, does pre-pyloric enteral nutrition compared to total parenteral nutrition result in an improved survival rate?

Treatment.

One paper was critically reviewed. It was an open-label, prospective pilot study.

Weak.

There was no difference in outcome between the two treatments in this study.

There is currently weak evidence on the effect of pre-pyloric enteral nutrition compared to total parenteral nutrition on the survival rate of dogs with acute pancreatitis.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** acute pancreatitis (MONDO:0006515)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** acute pancreatitis (MESH:D010195)
- **Species:** Canis lupus familiaris (dog, subspecies) [taxon 9615]

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13011048