Effects of a Community-Based Multi-Component Intervention on Subjective Well-Being in Older Adults: The Chofu–Digital–Choju Project in Japan
Tsubasa Nakada, Kayo Kurotani, Satoshi Seino, Takako Kozawa, Shinichi Murota, Miki Eto, Junko Shimasawa, Yumiko Shimizu, Shinobu Tsurugano, Fuminori Katsukawa, Kazunori Sakamoto, Hironori Washizaki, Yo Ishigaki, Maki Sakamoto, Keiki Takadama, Keiji Yanai, Osamu Matsuo

TL;DR
A community project in Japan aimed to improve older adults' well-being through online and in-person activities, but only increased internet use and health literacy.
Contribution
This study evaluates a novel community-based intervention combining in-person and online components to enhance well-being in older adults.
Findings
The intervention did not significantly improve subjective well-being over two years.
Participants increased internet usage frequency and showed improved health literacy.
Community hub participants showed reduced depressive symptoms and better health literacy.
Abstract
Background: Subjective well-being (SWB) is an essential indicator of successful aging. Although social connections enhance SWB among older adults, few interventions have integrated community-based approaches with information and communication technology (ICT). This study evaluated the Chofu–Digital–Choju (CDC) project, a multi-component community intervention fostering in-person and online social connections among community-dwelling older adults in urban Japan. Methods: This quasi-experimental study (January 2022 to March 2024) included community-dwelling older adults aged 65–84 years in Chofu City, Tokyo, Japan. The intervention consisted of online classes, community hubs as local third places, and community events. Baseline and follow-up data were collected using self-administered questionnaires. Propensity score matching (1:1) was used to reduce selection bias, and generalized…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTechnology Use by Older Adults · Health disparities and outcomes · Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
