# Impact of Voxel Grid Size and Statistical Uncertainty on Surface Depth Dose Via Various Planning Techniques and Immobilization Devices Using Monte Carlo Algorithm

**Authors:** Srinivas Challapalli, Anupam Choudhary, Jyothi Nagesh, Shambhavi C, Shirley Lewis, Umesh Velu, Jayashree NP, Ankita Mehta, Manoj Belwal, Dilson Lobo, Sarath S. Nair

PMC · DOI: 10.1177/15330338261425904 · 2026-03-20

## TL;DR

This study examines how changes in voxel grid size and statistical uncertainty affect surface dose depth in radiotherapy planning using Monte Carlo simulations.

## Contribution

The study introduces a detailed analysis of surface dose variations based on grid size and uncertainty in different immobilization devices and planning techniques.

## Key findings

- Higher statistical uncertainty and grid size significantly reduced dose calculation time.
- Surface dose at depth decreased with increasing grid size and increased with lower statistical uncertainty.
- IMRT consistently showed higher skin doses than VMAT, with vac-lock immobilization yielding the highest surface dose.

## Abstract

This study aims to analyze the impact of the surface dose at depth (1-5mm) in different planning techniques and immobilization devices by varying the dose-voxel size (DVS) and statistical uncertainty (SU) using Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm.

Three Sets of computed tomography (CT) images were taken from an in-house developed chest phantom, which included an open phantom, a vaclok and a thermoplastic mask. The image sets were pushed to the Monaco planning station for registration and contouring. Six beams of 6 MV photon energy are used to plan an Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) technique, and a half arc beam is used for Volumetric Modulated arc therapy (VMAT). In each plan, recalculation is performed by changing only the grid size from 1 mm to 8 mm and the statistical uncertainty from 1% to 5% from the parameter control window, keeping the other dose constraints the same. A total of 240 plans were performed for all three image sets together for both the IMRT and VMAT techniques, and the dose at depth was compared and statistically analyzed via the Kruskal–Walli's test.

The homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), and V95% target are increased in both IMRT and VMAT, whereas the SU and DVS are reduced.

Higher statistical uncertainty and grid size significantly reduced dose calculation time, independent of technique or device. surface dose at depth (1-5mm) decreased with increasing grid size and increased with lower statistical uncertainty. IMRT consistently showed higher skin doses than VMAT across all devices, with vac-lock immobilization yielding the highest surface dose in both techniques. These findings show that the surface dose is influenced by beam selection, parameter settings, and the optimization time allocated during treatment planning.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Cancer (MESH:D009369), acute radiation dermatitis (MESH:D054508), skin reactions (MESH:D012871), head and neck carcinoma (MESH:D006258), ORCID iDs (MESH:C535742), toxicity (MESH:D064420)
- **Chemicals:** SU (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Figures

9 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13010009/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13010009