# Strengthening equitable research capacity in response to infectious diseases of poverty

## TL;DR

The paper argues for democratizing research to address health inequities by promoting local ownership and inclusive approaches in tackling infectious diseases of poverty.

## Contribution

The novel contribution is advocating for a paradigm shift from externally driven research to inclusive, locally owned models that prioritize sustainability and equity.

## Key findings

- Equitable research capacity is essential for addressing global health challenges and reducing health inequities.
- Persistent inequities in gender, geography, and institutional hierarchies hinder participation and impact in research.
- Institutionalized inclusive research aligned with national priorities can improve health outcomes.

## Abstract

The inequitable global distribution of resources for research parallels the unequal global distribution of morbidity and mortality due to infectious diseases. Significant gaps in research capacity prevail, and equitable and accessible opportunities for research remain a priority. We argue for the democratisation of research: without equitable participation in, and ownership of, research, by those who are implementing the research or are part of the communities being researched, contextualised research needs and health system bottlenecks will remain unresolved. This perpetuates an inequitable power balance related to research and innovation. Equitable research capacity is fundamental to tackling global health challenges and reducing health inequity. We emphasise the evolution from externally driven, high-income-centric models of research capacity strengthening towards inclusive, context-sensitive approaches that prioritise local ownership, diversity and sustainability. A paradigm shift from ‘imposing technical support’ to ‘fostering ownership of knowledge’ has catalysed new models of engagement, such as implementation research capacity among health professionals and communities, and regionally anchored postgraduate training. Institutionalised, inclusive research can align with national priorities and yield measurable improvements in health outcomes. However, persistent inequities rooted in gender, geography and institutional hierarchies continue to constrain participation and impact. Addressing these requires deliberate strategies to democratise access, diversify partnerships and support under-represented institutions and individuals. Allowing dynamic roles in long-term partnerships and regional networks on a continuum between academic partners and capacity-strengthening recipients can support mitigation of intersectional inequities and lead to capacity strengthening.