# Factors associated with return to meaningful activities following physiotherapy for pelvic girdle pain during pregnancy: 3-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial

**Authors:** Annika Svahn Ekdahl, Monika Fagevik Olsén, Annelie Gutke

PMC · DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113480 · BMJ Open · 2026-03-18

## TL;DR

Most women with pelvic pain during pregnancy returned to normal activities within four months after childbirth, with improvements lasting three years.

## Contribution

Identified that pelvic pain tests at four months postpartum can predict long-term pain, offering a tool for risk assessment.

## Key findings

- 45.6% of participants fully returned to baseline activities three years postpartum.
- Positive pelvic provocation tests at four months predicted persistent pain at three years.
- Functioning improved over time, with no difference between treatment groups.

## Abstract

To investigate whether women who experienced pelvic girdle pain (PGP) during pregnancy were able to engage in meaningful activities at 4 months and 3 years post partum, and to identify factors associated with long-term functional outcomes.

Long-term follow-up of a randomised controlled trial comparing acupuncture and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for pregnancy-related PGP.

Physiotherapy outpatient clinics in Sweden.

In total, 113 pregnant women with clinically verified PGP were randomised in the original trial; 86 participated in the initial study phase, 77 attended the 4-month follow-up and 57 completed the 3-year follow-up questionnaire.

The primary outcome was functioning, assessed using the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS). Secondary outcomes included self-reported PGP, overall functioning and the prognostic value of pelvic pain provocation tests at 4 months post partum for persistent PGP at 3 years.

3 years post partum, the mean PSFS score was 8.64, and 45.6% of the participants scored 10, indicating full return to baseline activities. In repeated linear regression analyses, estimated PSFS scores were approximately 3 points lower at baseline and post-treatment compared with the 3-year follow-up (both p<0.001), indicating improved functioning over time, with no differences between treatment groups. Higher pain-related concern and higher Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire scores were associated with greater activity limitations (estimate −0.21, p=0.019 and −0.06, p<0.001, respectively). Logistic regression showed that the number of positive pelvic provocation tests at 4 months post partum significantly predicted self-reported PGP at 3 years (OR 2.98, 95% CI 1.26 to 7.05, p=0.013).

Most women with pregnancy-related PGP regained functioning by 4 months post partum, and this recovery was sustained at 3 years. The number of positive pelvic provocation tests at 4 months post partum predicted persistent pain at 3 years, suggesting potential prognostic value for identifying women at risk of long-term PGP and informing postpartum follow-up strategies.

In ‘FoU i Sverige’ (R&D in Sweden) No. 12726. https://www.researchweb.org/is/sverige/project/127261.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** long-term pain (MESH:D000088562), Depression (MESH:D003866), Pelvic pain (MESH:D017699), diabetes (MESH:D003920), Pain-related concern (MESH:D000072716), lumbar pain (MESH:D010146), pre-eclampsia (MESH:D011225), musculoskeletal (MESH:D009140), obstetric complication (MESH:D007744), PGP (MESH:D059388), Anxiety (MESH:D001007), pelvic floor-related symptoms (MESH:D059952), inflammatory (MESH:D007249), hypertension (MESH:D006973), low back pain (MESH:D017116)
- **Chemicals:** PGQ-T (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Canis lupus familiaris (dog, subspecies) [taxon 9615]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13007068/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13007068/full.md

## References

41 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13007068/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13007068