# A non-destructive plant screening method for improving sample uniformity in horticultural crops based on a hydrogen peroxide fluorescent probe

**Authors:** Weisen Lan, Hongjie Chen, Bingying Zou, Qingyuan Yi, Xia Lin, Junrong Xu, Tianying Lei, Junwei Zhang, Xinyuan Chen, Peng Wang, Wenjin Yu

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2026.1767323 · Frontiers in Plant Science · 2026-03-09

## TL;DR

This paper introduces a non-destructive fluorescent probe for detecting hydrogen peroxide in plants, improving stress response screening and sample uniformity in horticultural crops.

## Contribution

A novel 'turn-on' fluorescent probe for non-destructive H2O2 detection in plants, validated under various stress conditions and grafting models.

## Key findings

- The probe showed excellent selectivity and a strong linear correlation (R2 = 0.9849) with a low detection limit of 0.6450 μmol/L.
- Fluorescence dynamics in bottle gourd rootstocks reflected graft compatibility and stress responses, highlighting the probe's utility in prescreening.
- The method demonstrated good agreement with commercial assay kits and enabled follow-up analyses on the same plant specimens.

## Abstract

Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) functions as a key signaling molecule in plants responding to stress. Although numerous detection methods have been developed, simple and non-destructive techniques for the semi-quantitative monitoring of H2O2 in plant tissues remain scarce.

In this study, we developed a "turn-on" fluorescent probe specifically designed to detect endogenous H2O2 in plant tissues, and conducted spectroscopic and in vivo toxicity tests. Furthermore, under experimentally controlled stress conditions, we utilized this probe to detect H2O2 levels in four distinct plant types exposed to salt, waterlogging, cadmium, and drought stresses. Additionally, H2O2 was detected in a grafting model under non-experimentally controlled stress conditions.

The results showed that the probe demonstrated excellent selectivity, a strong linear correlation (R2 = 0.9849), and a low detection limit of 0.6450 μmol/L. Importantly, it exhibits good biocompatibility with plant tissues and effectively minimizes detection errors caused by transient H2O2 fluctuations induced by environmental changes. Consequently, it provides more accurate and stress-reflective H2O2 measurements. Under experimentally controlled stress conditions, the changes in relative fluorescence intensity conformed to the typical response patterns observed when plants experience graded levels of stress. Notably, even under complex grafting conditions without imposed stress gradients, applying the probe to bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria) rootstocks with different graft compatibility produced fluorescence dynamics consistent with the typical H2O2 responses of compatible and incompatible rootstocks, and the distribution of relative fluorescence intensity within the population underscored the importance of prescreening plants for biological studies. Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analyses confirmed good agreement between our method and the commercial assay kit.

These results demonstrate that the LWS probe enables H2O2 detection and, in combination with the IVIS in vivo imaging system, can screen individual plants differing in stress responses more effectively than other sensors. This non-destructive approach preserves the structural integrity of plant samples, enabling follow-up physiological, biochemical, and genomic analyses on the same specimens. This method provides a reliable prescreening platform for investigating plant stress responses at the biological level.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** hydrogen peroxide (PubChem CID 784), H2O2 (PubChem CID 784)
- **Species:** Lagenaria siceraria (taxon 3668)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** toxicity (MESH:D064420)
- **Chemicals:** salt (MESH:D012492), H2O2 (MESH:D006861), cadmium (MESH:D002104)
- **Species:** Lagenaria siceraria (bottle gourd, species) [taxon 3668]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13006615/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13006615/full.md

## References

75 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13006615/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13006615