# S-ketamine plus dexmedetomidine vs. S-ketamine plus propofol for sedation–analgesia during positioning for spinal anesthesia in older adults undergoing lower extremity fracture surgery

**Authors:** Yingying Guo, Tianjiao Wang, Wenyong Han

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2026.1706118 · Frontiers in Neurology · 2026-03-09

## TL;DR

This study compares two sedation methods for older adults during spinal anesthesia for leg fractures, finding that one provides better pain control and comfort.

## Contribution

The study introduces a novel comparison of S-ketamine plus dexmedetomidine versus S-ketamine plus propofol for sedation during spinal positioning in elderly patients.

## Key findings

- Dexmedetomidine-based sedation reduced pain during critical positioning stages and improved posture quality.
- Physiological differences were modest, with slightly higher SpO2 and lower heart rate and blood pressure in the dexmedetomidine group.
- Adverse events were rare in both groups, with no delirium cases in the dexmedetomidine group.

## Abstract

Positioning for neuraxial anesthesia in geriatric lower extremity fracture surgery is painful and can destabilize hemodynamics. Sedation–analgesia must balance effective analgesia with respiratory safety and physiologic stability.

This single-center retrospective cohort study included patients aged ≥65 years undergoing lower extremity fracture surgery under spinal anesthesia who received S-ketamine plus dexmedetomidine (Group A, n = 48) or S-ketamine plus propofol (Group B, n = 46). Primary outcomes included a numerical rating scale (NRS) positioning pain score of 0–10 and an ordinal posture quality score measured at five stages (T1–T5). Repeated measures were analyzed using mixed-effects models (group, stage, group×stage; random: patient) with covariate adjustment. Stage-wise contrasts were Holm-corrected.

A total of 100 records were screened, and 94 patients were analyzed. Group×stage interactions were significant for pain and posture quality. Group A had lower pain during the most noxious stages (T3–T5; adjusted differences −0.42 to −0.50) and higher odds of better posture quality (OR 2.30–2.70). Physiological differences were modest and stage-specific, with slightly higher SpO2 and lower heart rate (HR)/mean arterial pressure (MAP) at T2–T3. Postoperative NRS differed only at 12 h. Adverse events were infrequent; delirium was identified from routine documentation without a standardized instrument (0/48 vs. 2/46).

In this retrospective cohort, dexmedetomidine-based sedation with S-ketamine was associated with improved comfort and cooperation during spinal positioning compared with propofol-based sedation, while adverse events were infrequent in both groups.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** S-ketamine (PubChem CID 182137), dexmedetomidine (PubChem CID 5311068), propofol (PubChem CID 4943)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** delirium (MESH:D003693), pain (MESH:D010146), fracture (MESH:D050723)
- **Chemicals:** S-ketamine (MESH:C000629870), dexmedetomidine (MESH:D020927), propofol (MESH:D015742)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13006294/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13006294/full.md

## References

33 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13006294/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13006294