# Lipid Goal Achievement With Statins Among Statin-Naïve Indian Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

**Authors:** Mahidhar Jeedigunta, Vivek Veeram Reddy, Ganesh Paramasivam

PMC · DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2025.104163 · Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026-02-24

## TL;DR

This study found that only about 40% of Indian patients who had heart procedures achieved their cholesterol goals with statins, and one type of statin worked slightly better than another.

## Contribution

The study provides new insights into statin efficacy for lipid goal achievement in statin-naïve Indian patients undergoing PCI.

## Key findings

- Only 41.1% and 42.5% of patients achieved lipid goals at 1 and 6 months, respectively.
- Rosuvastatin showed better LDL-C goal attainment than atorvastatin at 1 month.
- Switching from atorvastatin to rosuvastatin modestly improved outcomes.

## Abstract

The effectiveness of current statin therapy in achieving lipid targets in Indian patients remains uncertain. This observational study aimed to evaluate lipid goal attainment at 1 and 6 months with atorvastatin and rosuvastatin in statin-naïve South Indian patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

This prospective, observational, single-center study included 491 statin-naïve patients who underwent PCI between March 2021 and May 2023. Effects of statins on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction and lipid goal achievement were assessed at 1 and 6 months. Secondary objectives compared the individual efficacy of atorvastatin vs rosuvastatin, the impact of baseline lipids, statin switching, and the association between lipid goal achievement and major adverse cardiovascular events.

Among 491 patients (mean age, 58.7 years), 437 (89%) presented with acute coronary syndrome. Atorvastatin was prescribed to 327 (66%) and rosuvastatin to 164 (34%). Baseline LDL-C was lower in the rosuvastatin group (122.7 ± 46.2 vs 138.2 ± 48.5 mg/dL; P = .001). At 1 month, 41% achieved American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology lipid goals (47.6% with rosuvastatin vs 37.1% with atorvastatin; P = .041). Atorvastatin to rosuvastatin switching was done in 113 (34.6%) patients. By 6 months, 42.5% achieved goals. Rosuvastatin showed better LDL-C goal attainment (62.8% vs 38.2%; P < .001). Rosuvastatin switching modestly improved outcomes (P ≤ .036).

Only 41.1% and 42.5% of statin-naïve Indian patients undergoing PCI achieved lipid goals on statins at 1 and 6 months, suggesting a need for more intensive lipid-lowering strategies post-PCI. Rosuvastatin was marginally more efficacious than atorvastatin.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** atorvastatin (PubChem CID 60823), rosuvastatin (PubChem CID 446157)
- **Diseases:** acute coronary syndrome (MONDO:0005542)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** acute coronary syndrome (MESH:D054058)
- **Chemicals:** Lipid (MESH:D008055), Rosuvastatin (MESH:D000068718), Atorvastatin (MESH:D000069059)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13005391/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13005391/full.md

## References

32 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13005391/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13005391