Isolation methods influence the biological properties of Wharton’s Jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells: A comparative study of yield, viability, proliferation, differentiation potential, and proteomic profiles
Jens Long Nguyen, Samih Mohamed-Ahmed, Ragda Saleem, Kamal Mustafa, Niyaz Al-Sharabi, Mariann Haavik Lysfjord Bentsen

TL;DR
This study compares different methods to isolate Wharton’s Jelly-derived stem cells and finds that one method with a growth factor produces the most viable and functional cells.
Contribution
The study identifies a robust isolation method for WJ-MSCs that enhances viability and metabolic resilience.
Findings
The non-scraped explant method with bFGF yields highest cell viability and proliferation.
Proteomic analysis reveals bFGF-treated cells are enriched for metabolic pathways.
Enzymatic isolation without bFGF leads to early culture failure in most donors.
Abstract
Mesenchymal stem cells derived from Wharton’s Jelly (WJ-MSCs) are an attractive cell source for regenerative medicine due to high proliferative capacity, non-invasive accessibility, and minimal ethical constraints. However, their therapeutic efficacy may vary with isolation technique and culture conditions. We compared three WJ-MSC isolation methods; two explant approaches (non-scraped and scraped) and one enzymatic method – each cultured with or without basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF). WJ-MSCs were obtained from three full-term umbilical cords, and subsequently evaluated for cell viability, proliferation kinetics, immunophenotypic surface marker expression, multilineage differentiation potential, and proteomic profiles through mass spectrometry coupled with bioinformatics analyses. All methods produced viable WJ-MSCs, although enzymatic isolation without bFGF resulted in early…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMesenchymal stem cell research · Pluripotent Stem Cells Research · Hair Growth and Disorders
