Screening of GO-coated microporous polymeric filters for efficient paraquat removal: effect of support surface on membrane roughness and flux stability
Syed Sibt-e-Hassan, Nurmeen Adil, Yan Wang, Syed Ghulam Musharraf

TL;DR
This paper explores how different support materials affect the performance of graphene oxide membranes in removing paraquat, a pesticide, from water.
Contribution
The study introduces a systematic comparison of support materials to optimize GO membrane performance for efficient paraquat removal.
Findings
M-GO membranes showed the highest water flux and stable paraquat rejection over multiple cycles.
M-GO retained 66% of its initial flux after 42 hours of continuous operation.
Membranes performed well in simulated agricultural water with high ionic strength and organic matter.
Abstract
We report the fabrication and systematic evaluation of three thin-layer graphene oxide (GO) composite membranes prepared by vacuum-filtering a GO dispersion (nominal loading 0.42 mg cm−2) onto low-cost microporous supports (mixed cellulose ester, nylon, PVDF; 0.45 µm pore, 12 cm2). The membranes (M-GO, N-GO, P-GO) were characterized by AFM, SEM, XPS, and contact angle measurements to reveal support-dependent GO morphology and surface chemistry. At low (0.2 bar) transmembrane pressure (TMP), M-GO exhibited the highest steady-state water flux (425 ± 10 L m−2 h−1, n = 3), followed by N-GO and P-GO, while all GO-coated membranes achieved near-complete paraquat rejection (≤ LOD = 0.04 ppm) for feed concentrations of 0.1–1.0 ppm. Reusability tests on M-GO demonstrated ≥95% removal over five consecutive 1 h cycles with a flux recovery ratio (FRR) ≥ 65% after hydraulic flushing. In a 42 h…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsParaquat toxicity studies and treatments · Membrane Separation Technologies · Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
