# Diagnosis of early kidney allograft rejection: influencing factors in metabolite-based urine analysis

**Authors:** Katharina Wiesner, Eric Schiffer, Franz Josef Putz, Andrew Robertson, Simone Mark, Simone Reichelt-Wurm, Katharina M. Schmidt, Amauri Schwaeble Santamaría, Bernhard Banas, Miriam C. Banas

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2026.1688235 · Frontiers in Medicine · 2026-03-06

## TL;DR

A urine test using metabolites can help detect early kidney transplant rejection, but factors like donor type and ischemia time affect its accuracy.

## Contribution

The study identifies key factors influencing the accuracy of a metabolite-based urine test for early kidney transplant rejection.

## Key findings

- Living donor kidney recipients showed the highest diagnostic accuracy with an AUC of 0.720.
- Short warm ischemia time (<30 min) also improved test accuracy with an AUC of 0.702.
- Metabolic profiles differ in deceased donor kidney recipients during the first two weeks post-transplant.

## Abstract

Acute allograft rejection remains a major complication in kidney transplantation, highlighting the need for accurate and early diagnostic tools to enable prompt treatment. Standard diagnostic methods, such as serum creatinine monitoring, lack sufficient sensitivity and specificity. As a result, subclinical rejection may go undetected, or unnecessary biopsies may be performed, posing additional risks. Previously, a novel, non-invasive urine test based on metabolomic profiling was developed to detect renal allograft rejection. However, the early post-transplant period remains particularly challenging, as reliable biomarker-based detection in this critical window is not yet well established. This study, conducted within the UMBRELLA project, analyzed 682 urine samples from 109 kidney transplant recipients. The test utilized a specific urinary metabolite constellation based on alanine, citrate, lactate, and urea. A total of 29 clinical and transplant-related parameters, including donor and recipient characteristics, ischemia times, and donor type, were evaluated for their effect on the test’s ability to detect biopsy-confirmed rejection within the first 14 days after transplantation. Univariate analysis identified 10 significant confounding factors, including lower residual urine volume before transplantation, reduced eGFR, use of induction therapy, longer warm and cold ischemia times, deceased donor status, younger recipient age, and certain HLA mismatches. Multivariate analysis confirmed the relevance of living donation. Subgroup analysis revealed the highest diagnostic accuracy in recipients of living donor kidneys, with an AUC of 0.720 (95% CI, 0.62–0.82), followed by recipients with a short warm ischemia time (<30 min), who achieved an AUC of 0.702 (95% CI, 0.61–0.79). Clinical complications often coincided with abnormal metabolite test results. In conclusion, this study underscores the importance of considering donor type and ischemia times when interpreting urinary metabolite constellations for rejection monitoring in the early post-transplant period. The findings suggest a distinct metabolic profile in recipients of deceased donor kidneys within the first 2 weeks after transplantation. Understanding these influencing factors may enhance the accuracy of non-invasive rejection detection and support timely clinical interventions to improve patient outcomes.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** alanine (PubChem CID 239), citrate (PubChem CID 31348), lactate (PubChem CID 61503), urea (PubChem CID 1176)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** ischemia (MESH:D007511)
- **Chemicals:** citrate (MESH:D019343), alanine (MESH:D000409), creatinine (MESH:D003404), lactate (MESH:D019344), urea (MESH:D014508)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13002353/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13002353/full.md

## References

35 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13002353/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13002353