Altered Dopamine Metabolism and Response to Treatment with Levodopa/Carbidopa in MCT8 Deficiency
Fabio Bruschi, Ylenia Vaia, Clara E. Antonello, Marco Spada, Francesco Porta, Cristina Marinaccio, Claudia Carducci, Thomas Opladen, Jacopo Sartorelli, Federica Maria Zibordi, Daniele Ghezzi, Francesco Nicita, Davide Tonduti

TL;DR
This study explores dopamine metabolism and treatment response in a rare brain disorder caused by a gene variant, showing that a common Parkinson's drug helps some patients.
Contribution
The study demonstrates that levodopa/carbidopa can alleviate movement symptoms in MCT8 deficiency, suggesting a role for dopamine dysfunction in the condition.
Findings
CSF analysis revealed reduced homovanillic acid levels in 3 out of 10 patients with MCT8 deficiency.
Levodopa/carbidopa treatment improved parkinsonism and reactivity in 7 out of 10 patients.
Dopaminergic circuit involvement in MCT8 deficiency is confirmed, supporting the use of dopaminergic therapy.
Abstract
Allan‐Herndon‐Dudley syndrome (AHDS)/monocarboxylate transporter 8 (MCT8) deficiency is a rare X‐linked encephalopathy caused by SLC16A2 variants, impairing thyroid hormone (TH) transport into the brain. This leads to early central nervous system (CNS) TH deficiency, affecting brain maturation. Dopaminergic circuit involvement is suggested by both pathophysiology and clinical features, reminiscent of infantile parkinsonism. This study investigates dopamine metabolism and levodopa/carbidopa response in MCT8 patients. We retrospectively and prospectively collected clinical, genetic, and neuroimaging data, performed cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biogenic amine analyses, and conducted neurological assessments before and after the levodopa trial (10 mg/kg/day). Ten patients exhibited developmental delay, spasticity, and infantile parkinsonism. CSF analysis showed reduced homovanillic acid in…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
| Patient 1 (13.3 y) | Patient 2 (5.9 y) | Patient 3 (14 y) | Patient 4 (6.1 y) | Patient 5 (5.5 y) | Patient 6 (18 y) | Patient 7 (1.5 y) | Patient 8 (1 y) | Patient 9 (0.75 y) | Patient 10 (1 y) | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scales | Basal | 3 mo post‐LD | 6 mo post‐LD | Basal | 3 mo post‐LD | 9 mo post‐LD | Basal | 3 mo post‐LD | 6 mo post‐LD | Basal | 3 mo post‐LD | Basal | 3 mo post‐LD | 6 mo post‐LD | Basal | 3 mo post‐LD | Basal | 3 mo post‐LD | Basal | 3 mo post‐LD | Basal | 3 mo post‐LD | Basal | 3 mo post‐LD |
| GMFM‐88 (%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lying and rolling (A) | 9.8 | 17.6 | 19.6 | 17.6 | 27.5 | 27.5 | 3.9 | 17.6 | 17.6 | 17.5 | 27.5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 100 | 100 | 31.37 | 25.49 | 33.33 | 27.45 | 9.8 | NA | na | na |
| Sitting (B) | 8.3 | 8.3 | 8.3 | 5 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 10 | 11.7 | 11.7 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | na | na |
| Crawling and kneeling (C) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 92.9 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | na | na |
| Standing (D) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 76.9 | 76.9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | na | na |
| Walking, running, jumping (E) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 52.8 | 56.9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | na | na |
|
| 3.6 | 5.2 | 5.6 | 4.5 | 6.8 | 6.8 | 2.8 | 5.9 | 5.9 | 4.5 | 6.5 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 84.5 | 86.8 | 6.59 | 5.5 | 6.66 | 5.49 | 1.96 | NA | na | na |
| EDACS | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | NA | 5 | 5 |
| CFCS | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | NA | 5 | 5 |
| MACS | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | NA | 5 | 5 |
| GMFCS | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | NA | 5 | 5 |
| GMFCS‐MLD | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | NA | 5 | 5 |
| BADS | 12 | 12 | 10 | 16 | 16 | 16 | na | na | na | 14 | na | 16 | 16 | 23 | 5 | na | 17 | 13 | 15 | 15 | 6 | NA | na | na |
| BFMDRS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dystonia movement scale | 39 | 39 | 35 | 25.5 | 37.5 | 36 | 15.5 | 23.5 | 23.5 | 21 | 22.5 | 63 | 63 | 84 | 2 | 2 | 50.5 | 38.5 | na | na | na | NA | na | Na |
| UPDRS part III | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 48 | 47 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| ID | Age at CSF analysis (y) | HVA | Reference range | 5HIAA | Reference range | HVA/5HIAA | Reference range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient 1 | 13 | 117 | 190–507 | 77 | 75–203 | 1.5 | 1.5–3.9 |
| Patient 2 | 5.3 | 407 | 313–824 | 149 | 130–362 | 2.7 | 1.5–4.1 |
| Patient 3 | 13.5 | 136 | 190–507 | 70 | 75–203 | 1.9 | 1.5–3.9 |
| Patient 4 | 5 | 346 | 313–824 | 172 | 130–362 | 2.01 | 1.5–3.4 |
| Patient 5 | 5.1 | 142 | 88–178 | 208 | 144–801 | 1.5 | 1.5–3.5 |
| Patient 6 | 17 | 286 | 98–450 | 172 | 45–135 | 1.66 | 1.5–3.5 |
| Patient 7 | 1.5 | 292 | 236–867 | 255 | 97–367 | 1.14 | 1.5–3.5 |
| Patient 8 | 1 | 234 | 364–870 | 155 | 155–319 | 1.5 | 1.6–3.9 |
| Patient 8 after trial with levodopa/carbidopa | 2 | 461 | 364–870 | 214 | 155–359 | 2.2 | 1.6–3.9 |
| Patient 9 | 0.75 | 492 | 302–845 | 293 | 152–462 | 1.63 | 1.5–3.5 |
| Patient 10 | 1 | 501 | 295–932 | 313 | 114–336 | 1.6 | 1.5–3.5 |
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsThyroid Disorders and Treatments · Mitochondrial Function and Pathology · Neurological diseases and metabolism
Allan‐Herndon‐Dudley syndrome (AHDS), or monocarboxylate transporter 8 (MCT8) deficiency, is a rare X‐linked encephalopathy affecting approximately 1 in 70,000 males. It is caused by pathogenic variants in SLC16A2, which codes for the MCT8, a crucial membrane transporter for thyroid hormones (THs).1, 2 AHDS presents with severe developmental delay/intellectual disability, axial hypotonia, combined pyramidal and extrapyramidal signs, and often epilepsy. In AHDS, the peripheral plasma profile is characterized by elevated T3, reduced T4, and often normal thyroid‐stimulating hormone, leading to peripheral thyrotoxicosis, which can result in significant cardiac and metabolic complications.1, 3
Patients exhibit markedly low central nervous system (CNS) TH levels and CNS hypothyroidism, which is thought to underline the severe neurological manifestations seen in patients with AHDS.2, 4, 5 Among these, movement disorders (MDs) have been frequently reported. Recently, we investigated MDs in a large cohort of patients with AHDS and found that hypokinesia was the most prevalent, affecting more than two‐thirds of subjects and having a major impact on patients' global disability.6 In line with the classification of childhood‐onset parkinsonism proposed by Leuzzi et al,7 these patients could be clinically diagnosed with developmental parkinsonism even if evidence for dopaminergic circuitry impairment or dopamine depletion in MCT8 deficiency is currently lacking.
Clinical trials of TH analogues have not shown a significant impact on the neurological manifestations of the disease, including MDs.8
Wilpert et al9 investigated dopamine metabolism in patients with AHDS, found cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biogenic amines abnormalities suggestive of an isolated pathway impairment, and observed a favorable response to levodopa (l‐dopa)/carbidopa. With our study we also sought to investigate dopamine metabolism in patients with AHDS and further evaluate the efficacy of l‐dopa in managing extrapyramidal signs.
Methods
We recruited patients with a genetically confirmed diagnosis of AHDS followed at three different tertiary centers in Italy with expertise in pediatric neurology: COALA (Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Leukodystrophies) at Vittore Buzzi Children's Hospital in Milan, IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Fondazione Carlo Besta in Milan, and Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital in Rome.
Demographic, clinical, genetic, and neuroimaging data were systematically collected in an electronic database. The study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki and received Institutional Review Board approval, with written informed consent obtained from parents or legal representatives.
Patients underwent comprehensive assessment for MDs using clinical evaluation, standardized scales, and video recordings, before and after drug titration and then every 3 months. For patients who were evaluated restrospectively, we relied on data in clinical charts.
All patients had lumbar punctures for CSF biogenic amine metabolite analysis (Table 2).
l‐Dopa was administered, starting at 1 mg/kg/day, and slowly titrated up to a target posology of 10 mg/kg/day. Treatment response was evaluated clinically, through parent reports, and qualitatively scored using the Clinical Global Impression–Improvement scale (CGI‐I).
Results
Clinical Data
We recruited, both retrospectively (3 patients) and prospectively (7 patients), 10 male patients with AHDS. Clinical and genetic data are summarized in Supporting Information Table S1.
At baseline, all patients exhibited hypokinetic MDs, including hypobradykinesia, hypomimia, and low motor initiative. Nine patients presented a severe phenotype characterized by absent postural control, global hypokinesia, mild to moderate dystonia, pyramidal signs, axial hypotonia, and low social interaction while alert. One patient presented a milder phenotype as he achieved autonomous walking (standing up at 2 years, autonomous walking at 3.5 years); his clinical picture was reminiscent of a classic parkinsonian syndrome except for the absence of resting tremor, which was associated with spasticity. Seven patients presented with startle reaction and 2/10 with paroxysmal phenomena. Motor and functional scales scores are reported in Table 1.
CSF Profiles
CSF collection was performed in all patients at a mean age of 6.9 (0.7–17) years. Biogenic amines were measured, and results are summarized in Table 2. CSF homovanillic acid (HVA), a dopamine metabolite, was pathologically low in three patients; in 7/10, levels were in the lowest quartile of the age‐specific reference range. One patient (patient 8) with initially altered HVA normalized after l‐dopa/carbidopa. 5‐Hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5‐HIAA) was normal in all but one patient (elevated), with no reported concomitant serotoninergic drug use. The HVA/5‐HIAA ratio was normal across all patients.
Levodopa/Carbidopa Trial
l‐Dopa/carbidopa was slowly titrated up to 10/2.5 mg/kg/day over 3 months in nine patients; one patient died at the age of 15.5 years, so we collected data on only biogenic amines and could not evalute response to treatment. Therapeutic benefit was observed only with a dosage exceeding 7 to 8 mg/kg/day. At this dosage, seven of the nine patients experienced better motor and nonmotor symptoms, including enhanced attention and a greater response to environmental stimuli, as indicated by better eye contact and social interaction, and reduced hypomimia (Video S1). In all nine cases, parents referred the same impression reported by secondary caregivers (physical therapists, speech therapists, teachers), who also described an improvement of hypomimia. l‐Dopa treatment led also to decreased hypokinesia/bradykinesia in eight of nine patients (Video S2). GMFM‐88 (Gross Motor Function Measure) improved in five of eight patients, showing a mean 50.69% increase in total score, primarily in Lying/Rolling (A) and Sitting subscales (B). Two patients had slight GMFM‐88 declines, and one showed no benefit. Despite GMFM‐88 score increases, no congruent improvements were observed across functional scales (Table 1). As expected, the increased motor activity corresponded to increased evidence of action dystonia, reflected by an 11.7% mean increase in BFMDRS scores, even if CGI‐I showed four patients as “much improved,” two as “minimally improved,” and three as “no change.”
Hypomimia and reactivity to environmental stimuli improvement after levodopa/carbidopa introduction at 3‐month follow‐up (10 mg/kg/day).
Hypobradkinesia and motor initiative improvement after levodopa/carbidopa introduction at 3‐month follow‐up (10 mg/kg/day). As expected, dystonic movements and posturing increase after drug titration; as per definition, dystonia is also induced by movement.
For three patients, a 6‐month follow‐up after l‐dopa introduction was available. Of these, one patient showed a further increase in GMFM‐88 scores; one patient, who had already shown no response at 3 months, did not exhibit any score increase.
In addition, for one patient, a 9‐month follow‐up was available, confirming sustained responsiveness to l‐dopa; GMFM‐88 score remained unchanged compared with the 3‐month evaluation, and clinical benefits persisted.
Discussion
We describe in this report a series of 10 patients diagnosed with AHDS, for which MDs were a common finding at neurological evaluation. All patients presented a clinical picture suggestive of developmental parkinsonism. In line with our previous results, parkinonian features were generally far more pronounced than dystonia and seemed to contribute significantly to the overall functional disability, alongside pyramidal signs and severe cognitive impairment.6
To better investigate the pathophysiology of MDs in these patients, we conducted a CSF biogenic amine analysis showing HVA below or at lower limits of the reference range in almost all subjects, thus strengthening recent observations by Wilpert et al.9 These concentrations were significantly higher than those typically observed in primary neurotransmitter disorders, yet consistent with a secondary defect.
In our cohort, the trial with l‐dopa/carbidopa demonstrated a positive response in seven patients, particularly in terms of increased responsiveness to environmental stimuli and interaction. All patients exhibited an improvement in hypomimia, with more evident facial expressions such as smiles in response to tactile or verbal stimuli from parents or physicians. Motor improvements included enhanced spontaneous activity and greater initiative in most patients, even with persistent spasticity, dystonia, and severe axial hypotonia. Notably, increased spontaneous motor activity was accompanied by slightly more prominent dystonic components, which was an expected finding because dystonia can worsen with voluntary movements.
Interestingly, in our cohort, l‐dopa–responsive patients seemed to maintain benefit from the drug both at 6 and 9 months after introduction. In our cohort, we did not observe any side effect.
THs play a pivotal role in human brain development and functionality. In fact, a lack of THs during embryonic, fetal, and immediate postnatal stages leads to significant alterations in CNS development, affecting both CNS structure and function.10 Thyroid organogenesis starts by the seventh week of gestation, during which the MCT8 transporter, crucial for TH action at the CNS level, is fully expressed in the cerebral cortex, with mRNA levels comparable with those of adulthood.11, 12 Immunohistochemistry studies in murine models showed that MCT8 is widely expressed in the CNS, highlighting the essential role of THs in developing neural structures and circuits during both intrauterine and early postnatal life. In particular, THs have been shown to be key factors in promoting dopaminergic differentiation of primary murine neural stem cells and rat neural progenitor cells, as well as neural progenitors derived from human embryonic stem cells in vitro, specifically in relation to the basal ganglia.13
TH and MCT8 are essential not only for proper fetal development of extrapyramidal circuits but also for their correct postnatal function; they appear to be involved in dopamine synthesis and trafficking. In fact, in neonatal hypothyroidism, reduced activity of tyrosine hydroxylase, an enzyme responsible for dopamine synthesis and turnover, has been observed10, 14; in addition, alterations in axonal transport of dopamine vesicles from the substantia nigra to the striatum have been demonstrated because of altered expression levels of various tubulin isoforms.10, 15 Furthermore, the expression of MCT8 in both D1‐ and D2‐medium spiny neurons of the basal ganglia suggests that its impaired function may disrupt the precise balance of the striatal microcircuitry, which includes the direct (D1) and indirect (D2) pathways, thus contributing to the pathophysiology of MDs.16
In summary, the pathophysiology of the extrapyramidal signs characteristic of AHDS is complex, multifactorial, and not yet fully understood. Basal ganglia dysfunction may arise from an early disruption of the normal developmental process of these structures during the gestational period, abnormal dopamine synthesis and trafficking, thus suggesting considering AHDS a fetopathy.
Basal ganglia involvement reflects in MDs typical of this syndrome, particularly parkinsonism and dystonia, for which therapy with l‐dopa should be considered.
This study was limited by several factors, including its small sample size because of disease rarity. The evaluation of environmental reactivity and attention was also challenged by a reliance on subjective measures and the absence of standardized scales for childhood parkinsonism. Furthermore, the partly retrospective nature of the study led to incomplete data for some patients. Future research should expand the sample size, develop specific standardized scales, and conduct in vivo studies of the dopaminergic system using nuclear medicine techniques to understand pathophysiology and guide new treatments.
Author Roles
(A) Study conception and design, (B) study execution, (C) data analysis, (D) writing of the first draft, (E) review and critique, (F) editing of final version of the manuscript.
F.B.: A, B, C, D, E, F.
D.T.: A, B, C, D, E, F.
Y.V.: B, E.
C.E.A.: B, E.
M.S.: B, E.
F.P.: B, E.
C.M.: B, E.
C.C.: B, E.
T.O.: B, E.
J.S.: B, E.
F.M.Z.: B, E.
D.G.: B, E.
F.N.: B, E.
Financial Disclosures for the Previous 12 Months
D.T. participated in scientific advisory with Medscape, Icometrix, Inizio Evoke, and Regulatory Pharma Net.
Supporting information
Table S1. Clinical, genetic and instrumental data of the MCT8 cohort.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Groeneweg S , van Geest FS , Abacı A , et al. Disease characteristics of MCT 8 deficiency: an international, retrospective, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2020;8(7):594–605.32559475 10.1016/S 2213-8587(20)30153-4PMC 7611932 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2van Geest FS , Gunhanlar N , Groeneweg S , Visser WE . Monocarboxylate transporter 8 deficiency: from pathophysiological understanding to therapy development. Front Endocrinol 2021;12:723–750.10.3389/fendo.2021.723750 PMC 844093034539576 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Tonduti D , Vanderver A , Berardinelli A , et al. MCT 8 deficiency: extrapyramidal symptoms and delayed myelination as prominent features. J Child Neurol 2013;28(6):795–800.22805248 10.1177/0883073812450944 PMC 4155008 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Heuer H , Maier MK , Iden S , Mittag J , Friesema ECH , Visser TJ , Bauer K . The monocarboxylate transporter 8 linked to human psychomotor retardation is highly expressed in thyroid hormone‐sensitive neuron populations. Endocrinology 2005;146(4):1701–1706.15661862 10.1210/en.2004-1179 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5van Geest FS , Groeneweg S , Visser WE . Monocarboxylate transporter 8 deficiency: update on clinical characteristics and treatment. Endocrine 2021;71:689–695.33650046 10.1007/s 12020-020-02603-y PMC 8016746 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Masnada S , Sarret C , Antonello CE , et al. Movement disorders in MCT 8 deficiency/Allan‐Herndon‐Dudley syndrome. Mol Genet Metab 2022;135(1):109–113.34969638 10.1016/j.ymgme.2021.12.003 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Leuzzi V , Nardecchia F , Pons R , Galosi S . Parkinsonism in children: clinical classification and etiological spectrum. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2021;82:150–157.33109474 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2020.10.002 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Wilpert NM , Tonduti D , Vaia Y , Krude H , Sarret C , Schuelke M . Establishing patient‐centered outcomes for MCT 8 deficiency: stakeholder engagement and systematic literature review. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2023;19:2195–2216.37881807 10.2147/NDT.S 379703 PMC 10595182 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
