Correction: Anaphase onset requires CKS-1–mediated destruction of securin in meiosis I and cyclin B1 in meiosis II
Jie Yang, Eisuke Sumiyoshi, Bruce Bowerman

Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics · Glycogen Storage Diseases and Myoclonus · Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
Vol. 225, No. 2 | https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202502087 | January 22, 2026
After publication, the authors realized that they had neglected to cite related papers by Kõivomägi and colleagues (Kõivomägi et al., 2011 and Kõivomägi et al., 2013) and Yu and Reed (Yu and Reed, 2005).
The following articles are now addressed in the text:
Kõivomägi, M., E. Valk, R. Venta, A. Iofik, M. Lepiku, E.R.M. Balog, S.M. Rubin, D.O. Morgan, and M. Loog. 2011. Cascades of multisite phosphorylation control Sic1 destruction at the onset of S phase. Nature. 480:128-132. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10560
Kõivomägi, M., M. Örd, A. Iofik, E. Valk, R. Venta, I. Faustova, R. Kivi, E.R.M. Balog, S.M. Rubin, and M. Loog. 2013. Multisite phosphorylation networks as signal processors for Cdk1. Nat. Struct. Mol. Bio. 20:1415-1424. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2706
Yu, V.P.C.C., and S.I. Reed. 2005. Cks1 id dispensable for survival in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell Cycle. 3:1402-1404. https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.3.11.1208
In the Discussion section, the second paragraph of the subsection titled “Meiosis II anaphase onset in C. elegans oocytes requires CYB-3 presence and CYB-1 destruction” has been edited. A citation for Kõivomägi et al. (2013) was added to the first sentence. The last sentence of this paragraph was changed from “However, while mutational inactivation of the CKS anion pocket in budding yeast altered the phosphorylation status of some CDK-1 targets, loss of the anion pocket was not lethal, in contrast to the lethality caused by complete loss of budding yeast CKS (McGrath et al., 2013)” to “However, while mutational inactivation of the CKS anion pocket in budding yeast altered the phosphorylation status of some CDK-1 targets, loss of the anion pocket was not lethal (Kõivomägi et al., 2011), and indeed null mutations in budding yeast CKS result in slower growth and misshapen cells but are not lethal (Yu and Reed, 2005).” In the paragraph below, the additions are indicated in bold, and deletions are crossed out.
Meiosis II anaphase onset in C. elegans oocytes requires CYB-3 presence and CYB-1 destruction (second paragraph)
“First, in budding yeast, the anion pocket was shown to be required for CKS to bind phosphorylated CDK targets and promote their destruction through further phosphorylation by CDK-1 (Asfaha et al., 2022; Kõivomägi et al., 2013; McGrath et al., 2013). Presumably, the increased phosphorylation either promotes target association with the APC/C adaptor Cdc20 or otherwise makes targets more suitable for poly-ubiquitylation. However, while mutational inactivation of the CKS anion pocket in budding yeast altered the phosphorylation status of some CDK-1 targets, loss of the anion pocket was not lethal, in contrast to the lethality caused by complete loss of budding yeast CKS (McGrath et al., 2013)** (Kõivomägi et al., 2011), and indeed null mutations in budding yeast CKS result in slower growth and misshapen cells but are not lethal (Yu and Reed, 2005)**.”
The conclusions of the paper are not affected by this error, and all discussion of the data presented remains correct. This error appears in print and in PDFs downloaded on or before March 16, 2026. The authors apologize for any confusion this may have caused.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Asfaha J.B. Örd M. Carlson C.R. Faustova I. Loog M. Morgan D.O. . 2022. Multisite phosphorylation by Cdk 1 initiates delayed negative feedback to control mitotic transcription. Curr. Biol 32:256–263.e 4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.11.00134818519 PMC 8752490 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Kõivomägi M. Valk E. Venta R. Iofik A. Lepiku M. Balog E.R.M. Rubin S.M. Morgan D.O. Loog M. . 2011. Cascades of multisite phosphorylation control Sic 1 destruction at the onset of S phase. Nature. 480:128-132. doi: 10.1038/nature 1056021993622 PMC 3228899 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Kõivomägi M. Örd M. Iofik A. Valk E. Venta R. Faustova I. Kivi R. Balog E.R.M. Rubin S.M. Loog M. . 2013. Multisite phosphorylation networks as signal processors for Cdk 1. Nat. Struct. Mol. Bio 20:1415-1424. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.270624186061 PMC 3855452 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Mc Grath D.A. Balog E.R.M. Kõivomägi M. Lucena R. Mai M.V. Hirschi A. Kellogg D.R. Loog M. Rubin S.M. . 2013. Cks confers specificity to phosphorylation-dependent CDK signaling pathways. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol 20:1407–1414. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.270724186063 PMC 4242096 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Yu V.P.C.C. Reed S.I. . 2005. Cks 1 is dispensable for survival in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell Cycle. 3:1402-1404. doi: 10.4161/cc.3.11.120815467473 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
