# A function-based framework for AI-amplified, data-driven healthcare simulation research

**Authors:** Carla Sa-Couto

PMC · DOI: 10.1186/s41077-026-00426-x · Advances in Simulation · 2026-02-28

## TL;DR

This paper introduces a framework for using AI in healthcare simulations to better utilize data and improve research outcomes.

## Contribution

The novel contribution is a function-based framework that organizes AI use in simulation research by its purpose rather than algorithm type.

## Key findings

- The framework categorizes AI use into four functional domains: data processing, predictive analytics, behavioral analysis, and automation.
- It provides practical steps for embedding AI in research planning, emphasizing human-AI collaboration and ethical considerations.
- The framework aims to guide intentional AI adoption in simulation research to enhance analytic capacity.

## Abstract

Healthcare simulation research increasingly generates rich, multimodal datasets, yet substantial portion of these data remain underutilized due to analytic, technical, and resource constraints. As artificial intelligence becomes more accessible, there is a risk that adoption in simulation research is driven by novelty rather than by clearly articulated analytic needs. This article proposes a function-based framework that conceptualizes artificial intelligence as a research amplifier for data-driven simulation-based research. Rather than organizing approaches by algorithm family or tool type, the framework groups AI use according to its function in the research workflow across four domains: (1) Data Processing and Integration: transforming raw traces into synchronized, research-ready datasets; (2) Comparative and Predictive Analytics: benchmarking performance and modeling learning trajectories or outcomes; (3) Behavioral and Interaction Analysis: decoding individual and team behaviors from observational traces; and (4) Automation and Acceleration: streamlining research activities such as transcription, coding support, and structured summarization through automated or semi-automated workflows. Five practical steps illustrate how the framework can be embedded in research planning: clarifying the analytic task, mapping it to functional domains, specifying data representations and integration needs, designing the human–AI division of labor, and planning evaluation and reporting. Ethical, trust, and accountability considerations are discussed across functional domains, emphasizing that distinct risks and safeguards emerge across different AI-enabled research activities. By centering function and purpose, this framework aims to help simulation researchers make explicit, intentional decisions about when and how AI meaningfully extends analytic capacity.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41077-026-00426-x.

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** NINL (ninein like) [NCBI Gene 22981] {aka NLP}
- **Diseases:** brain-tumor (MESH:D001932), LLMs (MESH:D007806), tumor (MESH:D009369), AI (MESH:C538142), bleeding (MESH:D006470), trauma (MESH:D014947)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13001207/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13001207/full.md

## References

2 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13001207/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13001207