Correction to “Variability of the Human Serum Metabolome over 3 Months in the EXPOsOMICS Personal Exposure Monitoring Study”
Max J. Oosterwegel, Dorina Ibi, Lützen Portengen, Nicole Probst-Hensch, Sonia Tarallo, Alessio Naccarati, Medea Imboden, Ayoung Jeong, Nivonirina Robinot, Augustin Scalbert, Andre F. S. Amaral, Erik van Nunen, John Gulliver, Marc Chadeau-Hyam, Paolo Vineis, Roel Vermeulen
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
- —Horizon 2020 Framework Programme10.13039/100010661
- —Seventh Framework Programme10.13039/100011102
- —Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap10.13039/501100003245
- —Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek10.13039/501100003246
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies · Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging · Animal testing and alternatives
In the abstract, we incorrectly described the type of measurement error observed across the metabolome as "differential measurement error". The correct term is "nondifferential measurement error". The final sentence of the abstract should read as follows: "Variance across the metabolome will result in nondifferential measurement error across the metabolome, which needs to be considered in the interpretation of metabolome results". This correction does not affect any data, results, or interpretations presented in the paper. We regret this error and appreciate the opportunity to correct the record.