# Divergent Transcriptional Architectures Beyond Core CAM Genes in Facultative and Constitutive CAM Species in Tillandsia L

## TL;DR

This study explores how different species use similar core genes but distinct supporting genes to evolve water-efficient photosynthesis called CAM.

## Contribution

The research reveals that CAM evolution involves conserved core genes but divergent transcriptional architectures in closely related species.

## Key findings

- Core CAM enzymes show conserved expression patterns across species.
- Facultative CAM species uniquely upregulate PPC2 instead of the canonical PPC1 under water stress.
- Transcriptional shifts in stomatal movement and starch metabolism show minimal overlap between species.

## Abstract

Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) is a water‐efficient photosynthetic strategy involving a coordinated suite of complex traits including metabolic, anatomical and regulatory aspects that shift across the diel cycle. While CAM has evolved repeatedly in land plants, the evolutionary routes enabling this convergence remain elusive. Whereas the same core CAM (de)carboxylation genes are consistently involved, a key question is whether distinct CAM phenotypes also depend on a shared set of auxiliary genes, reflecting a quantitative continuum of expression, or whether they can instead emerge through divergent or redundant peripheral solutions. The bromeliad subgenus Tillandsia, with diverse photosynthetic strategies, offers an ideal system to explore this question. Using physiological and transcriptomic analyses of well‐watered and water‐limited accessions of two closely related species, we characterised facultative and constitutive CAM. By comparing orthologous gene expression and orthogroup recruitment, we found that while both species performed CAM upon water‐withholding, transcriptional shifts in pathways related to stomatal movement, sugar/malate transport, aquaporins and starch metabolism showed minimal overlap. Core enzymes involved in the CAM (de)carboxylation cycle exhibited broadly shared expression patterns, yet the facultative CAM species uniquely upregulated PPC2 at night instead of the canonical CAM‐related PEPC ortholog PPC1. Our study reveals that, while the expression of certain core CAM enzymes is conserved, the surrounding transcriptional architecture can differ substantially even between closely related species. This supports a model in which CAM evolves through a mosaic recruitment of functionally equivalent, yet nonorthologous genes—underscoring its flexible and modular genetic architecture. These insights advance our understanding of the mechanisms enabling the repeated evolution of CAM and its capacity to facilitate adaptive diversification.