# Quiescence of postharvest pathogens: a fungal inhibition process or an immune response of the unripe host fruit?

**Authors:** Dov B. Prusky, Tong Chen, Yong Chen, Shiping Tian, Boqiang Li

PMC · DOI: 10.1111/nph.70913 · The New Phytologist · 2026-02-01

## TL;DR

This paper explores how postharvest pathogens remain dormant in unripe fruits and activate during ripening, involving interactions between fungal strategies and host immune responses.

## Contribution

The study provides new insights into the regulatory mechanisms governing quiescence and activation of postharvest pathogens during fruit ripening.

## Key findings

- Quiescence of biotrophic-like pathogens is regulated by chromatin-level control and effector secretion.
- Host defenses during quiescence include activation of pattern recognition receptors and ethylene signaling.
- Fruit ripening triggers pathogen activation through weakened defenses and metabolic changes.

## Abstract

Postharvest pathogens can infect fresh produce both before and after harvest, by direct or wound‐enhanced penetration, remaining quiescent until ripening. Biotrophic‐like postharvest pathogens persist beneath host cells and can remain in a state of quiescence. They detect environmental cues and regulate quiescence through chromatin‐level control and the secretion of effectors that interact with host pattern recognition receptors. By contrast, necrotrophic fungi persist between dead cells and depend more directly on nutrient availability to prime their growth and upon secretion for fungal virulence factors. During quiescence, the host also mounts specific responses, including activation of pattern recognition receptor genes, ethylene signaling (particularly in unripe fruit), and defense genes such as PR‐10 and chitinases. Jasmonic acid and ethylene pathways synergistically enhance these defenses. As fruit ripens, the transition from quiescence to active necrotrophic growth is triggered, accelerating tissue decay. This activation is driven by several key factors, including weakened host defenses, decreased levels of antifungal compounds such as polyphenols, increased cell wall accessibility due to fruit softening and ripening‐associated changes in signaling pathways, which alter environmental pH, carbon metabolism, and secondary metabolite production. These regulatory mechanisms collectively govern the timing and extent of fungal initiation of colonization during fruit senescence.

## Linked entities

- **Genes:** PR-10 (stress-induced protein SAM22) [NCBI Gene 547915]
- **Chemicals:** jasmonic acid (PubChem CID 105087), ethylene (PubChem CID 6325)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** fungal (MESH:D009181)
- **Chemicals:** ethylene (MESH:C036216), carbon (MESH:D002244), polyphenols (MESH:D059808), Jasmonic acid (MESH:C011006)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13000976/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13000976/full.md

## References

101 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13000976/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13000976