Treatment of Burkitt lymphoma in real-world setting: findings on 104 consecutive cases diagnosed and treated in Kazakhstan over the last decade
Akmaral Jazyltayeva, Nazarii Shokun, Ayazhan Umutbayeva, Luana Conte, Raigul Ramazanova, Vadim Kemaikin, Azat Karabekov, Aidana Shalabay, Aigerim Koshkarbayeva, Nurbergen Kemelbekov, Madina Zhumabay, Fariza Shokubayeva, Yana Stepanihyna, Massimo Federico, Saule Gabbasova

TL;DR
This study analyzed treatment outcomes for 104 Burkitt lymphoma patients in Kazakhstan, showing better survival in children compared to adults.
Contribution
The study provides real-world treatment outcomes and prognostic factors for Burkitt lymphoma in Kazakhstan, emphasizing the disparity in adult outcomes.
Findings
Pediatric patients treated with R-BFM had significantly better 3-year OS and PFS compared to adults.
Age ≥ 40 years was the only independent adverse prognostic factor in multivariate analysis.
R-Hyper-CVAD and R-CODOX-M/R-IVAC showed better OS than R-EPOCH in adult patients.
Abstract
We investigated treatment outcomes, relapse risk, and survival in 104 consecutive patients with non-endemic Burkitt lymphoma (BL) diagnosed and treated in Kazakhstan between 2013 and 2024 in a real-world setting. This was a retrospective, clinically based study analyzing baseline characteristics, treatment regimens, response to first-line therapy, prognostic factors, relapse, and survival. The median age was 26 years (range 2–80), with a male predominance (64%). All cases underwent MYC rearrangement assessment, and EBV status was available in 80 patients, with 28% testing positive. Curative-intent therapy was delivered to 95 patients (91%), including R-BFM (44%), R-EPOCH (23%), R-CODOX-M/R-IVAC (18%), and R-Hyper-CVAD (15%); no patient underwent autologous stem cell transplantation. After a median follow-up of 57 months, the 3-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment · Lymphadenopathy Diagnosis and Analysis · CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
