Hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation studies: why and how to do them
Jure Baloh, Sara J. Landes, Jeffrey L. Smith, Geoffrey M. Curran

TL;DR
This paper explains how to combine effectiveness and implementation studies to improve healthcare interventions and their real-world use.
Contribution
It introduces new methodological guidance for integrating implementation aims into effectiveness studies.
Findings
Hybrid type 1 studies can be applied across various intervention types and settings.
Three goals guide implementation aims: explaining implementation, exploring stakeholder perceptions, and informing effectiveness trials.
Tools and resources are provided to help design these hybrid studies.
Abstract
Effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 1 studies primarily investigate the effectiveness of an intervention and have a secondary focus on exploring implementation-related factors. Integrating implementation aims into intervention effectiveness studies can improve the speed, quantity, and quality of intervention implementation, sustainment, and scale in routine practice, and thereby maximize the impact on population health. This article provides guidance for designing and conducting the implementation aims of effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 1 studies, summarizing past thinking and advancing new considerations for these approaches. The authors argue that hybrid type 1 approaches are suitable for most types of intervention effectiveness research (e.g., efficacy trials, comparative-effectiveness research, observational studies), for different kinds of interventions (e.g.,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHealth Policy Implementation Science · Community Health and Development · Evaluation and Performance Assessment
