Custodiol Versus Del Nido Cardioplegia in Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Repair–a Propensity Score-Matched Study
Dustin Greve, Serdar Akansel, Jan Holler, Martina Dini, Emilija Miskinyte, Hristian Hinkov, Stephan Jacobs, Volkmar Falk, Jörg Kempfert, Markus Kofler

TL;DR
This study compares two cardioplegic solutions in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery, finding Del Nido offers better early myocardial protection without compromising clinical outcomes.
Contribution
The study provides novel comparative evidence on Custodiol versus Del Nido cardioplegia in minimally invasive mitral valve repair using propensity score matching.
Findings
Del Nido cardioplegia was associated with significantly lower cardiac enzyme levels and inotrope scores post-surgery.
Fewer cardioversions and shocks were needed with Del Nido, indicating better arrhythmia control.
Clinical outcomes and complication rates were comparable between the two groups.
Abstract
Minimally invasive mitral valve repair (MIMVR) is the preferred approach to treat mitral regurgitation in specialized centres. Custodiol and Del Nido cardioplegia are widely used, yet direct comparative data on their efficacy and safety in this setting remain limited. This study investigated their efficacy and impact on early outcomes in a propensity-matched cohort. We performed a single-centre, retrospective matched cohort study of 2490 patients undergoing minimally invasive mitral valve surgery between October 2014 and January 2025. After exclusions, 960 patients entered 1:1 propensity score matching based on risk factors, baseline characteristics and procedural parameters, yielding 778 matched cases treated with Custodiol or Del Nido cardioplegia. Perioperative dynamics of cardiac enzymes were evaluated as the primary outcome measure, along with an exploratory analysis on clinical…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion · Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments · Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
