# Otoplasty for prominent ear: A systematic review of surgical techniques

**Authors:** Hamish Thomson, Jack Gosden, Anirban Mandal

PMC · DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2026.02.013 · JPRAS Open · 2026-02-23

## TL;DR

This paper reviews various surgical techniques for correcting prominent ears and evaluates their effectiveness and complication rates.

## Contribution

The study systematically compares multiple otoplasty techniques to identify those with lower recurrence and reoperation rates.

## Key findings

- Suture + cartilage-scoring and cartilage-scoring + flap hybrids show lower recurrence and reoperation rates.
- High-quality randomized trials are needed to confirm the best otoplasty technique.
- 22 studies were analyzed, including 19 retrospective and 3 prospective cohort studies.

## Abstract

Prominent ear is a common auricular malformation that can have long-term psychosocial consequences on affected individuals. Otoplasty remains the standard surgical corrective treatment; however, the optimal technique has long been debated, with >200 methods described in the literature. This systematic review, conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, aimed to evaluate the available evidence on the most effective otoplasty approach. The outcomes assessed across different techniques (exclusive suture, exclusive cartilage-scoring, incisionless, suture + flap, suture + cartilage-scoring, and cartilage-scoring + flap hybrids) included: a) number of patients suffering a complication, b) recurrence, c) reoperation, d) infection, e) keloid or hypertrophic scar formation, and f) haematoma. A search of PubMed and MEDLINE identified 412 papers. Following PICOT framework-guided screening, application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, and quality assessment, 22 studies were included: 19 retrospective and three prospective cohort studies. Current medical literature suggests that suture + cartilage-scoring and cartilage-scoring + flap hybrid methods, may be associated with lower rates of recurrence, and reoperation when compared to single-technique or suture + flap approaches. However, high-quality, long-term randomised control trials are required to determine the superior technique for otoplasty.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** hypertrophic scar (MESH:D017439), auricular malformation (MESH:D004428), infection (MESH:D007239), keloid (MESH:D007627)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12996986/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12996986/full.md

## References

41 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12996986/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12996986