# Post‐surgery level of circulating DNA in stage III colon cancer patients: Impact on the reliability of minimal residual disease detection

**Authors:** Andrei Kudriavtsev, Saidi Daoud, Catalina Isabel Cofre Muñoz, Alexia Mirandola, Ekaterina Pisareva, Javier Gonzalo Ruiz, Marco Macagno, Nadia Saoudi Gonzalez, Evelyne Crapez, Marc Ychou, Ramon Salazar Soler, Elisabetta Fenocchio, Paula X. Fernandez Calotti, Thibault Mazard, Cristina Santos Vivas, Elena Elez, Federica Di Nicolantonio, Alain R. Thierry

PMC · DOI: 10.1002/ijc.70370 · International Journal of Cancer · 2026-02-11

## TL;DR

This study shows that DNA levels in the blood of colon cancer patients fluctuate after surgery, affecting the accuracy of detecting leftover cancer cells.

## Contribution

The study reveals that neutrophil extracellular traps significantly influence post-surgery DNA levels, challenging assumptions about optimal timing for MRD testing.

## Key findings

- Post-surgical circulating DNA levels in stage III colon cancer patients vary significantly, with up to 18-fold differences observed.
- Neutrophil extracellular traps are strongly correlated with circulating DNA levels, suggesting they are a major confounding factor.
- The study proposes a sampling window between the fourth and sixth week post-surgery for more reliable MRD detection.

## Abstract

Minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment using circulating nuclear DNA (cir‐nDNA) testing has demonstrated strong prognostic value in patients with operable stage III colon cancer (CC). However, further clinical research is needed to optimize the use of adjuvant therapy in this context. Since the sensitivity of variant allele frequency (VAF)‐based MRD detection depends on total cirDNA concentration, we investigated its variation in 67 stage III CC patients over 8 weeks following surgery. A majority of patients showed significantly higher post‐surgical cir‐nDNA levels compared to their pre‐surgical baseline—71.1% during the first month and 51.4% during the second. Cir‐nDNA levels tended to considerably vary (up to 18‐fold), especially during the first 3 weeks after surgery. We also observed a strong correlation between cir‐nDNA levels and neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) markers throughout the 2‐month post‐operative period. While previous studies have generally assumed that cir‐nDNA levels decrease significantly within 1 month post‐surgery in MRD‐negative stage III patients, our findings challenge this paradigm. NETs appear to be a substantial source of cir‐nDNA and represent a major confounding factor in interpreting total cir‐nDNA, given the high inter‐individual variability in NETs production after surgery. Our data suggest that defining a single optimal time point for MRD testing may be misleading. Instead, we propose a sampling window between fourth and sixth week post‐surgery. Additionally, our results call into question the reliance on VAF as a standalone metric for MRD detection. The most robust strategy would involve integrated monitoring of total cir‐nDNA concentration, absolute mutant DNA levels, and NETs‐associated inflammation.

Circulating nuclear DNA (cir‐nDNA)‐based assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD) offers powerful post‐surgery prognostic insight for stage III colon cancer (CC). Sparse knowledge of post‐surgical variations and origins in cir‐nDNA, however, has limited its clinical application. Here, the authors evaluated changes in cir‐nDNA through 8 weeks following surgery in stage III CC patients. High inter‐individual variation of total cir‐nDNA concentration was observed and linked to neutrophil extracellular trap formation, a driver of cancer progression. Although cirDNA concentrations typically were elevated during the initial 2 months following surgery, the findings raise questions about optimal post‐surgery blood collection time for MRD detection.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** colon cancer (MONDO:0002032)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** III (MESH:C537189), CC (MESH:D015179), inflammation (MESH:D007249)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12996737/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12996737/full.md

## References

37 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12996737/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12996737